Key research themes
1. How does metalinguistic discourse shape language variation and effectiveness of prescriptivism in real-time contexts?
This research area focuses on understanding the dynamic interaction between prescriptive linguistic norms and actual language use as captured through metalinguistic discourse, particularly as it unfolds in real time using monitor corpora. It investigates how prescriptivism influences or fails to influence language variation, the compartmentalization of linguistic variants, and the role of metalanguage variation in shaping prescriptive effectiveness. This matters for linguists studying the practical impact of prescriptivism on language change and variation within digital and mediated communication environments.
2. What linguistic, social, and methodological critiques challenge the foundations and implications of prescriptivism?
This theme explores critical assessments of prescriptivism grounded in linguistic theory, social consequences, and methodological rigor. It includes reflections on the political economy of linguistic research, the ideological underpinnings of prescriptivism, and tensions between descriptive and prescriptive linguistic paradigms. The goal is to understand how institutional power, academic politics, and methodological choices shape, sustain, or challenge prescriptive norms and practices across linguistic communities.
3. How do expressive uses of language and newly emerging linguistic forms (e.g., neologisms) interact with prescriptive norms and language policing?
This area investigates the interface between linguistic prescriptivism and expressive or emerging linguistic phenomena such as evaluative adjectives and digital-age neologisms. It examines the tension between nonrepresentational language functions (expressivism) and prescriptive attempts to regulate language maintenance. The focus lies on the sociopragmatic and morphological dynamics of language policing, highlighting how moral gradience, politeness, and community norms govern acceptance or rejection of linguistic innovations.