Christopher Hill

Cambridge Future Tech builds DeepTech ventures and last week we hit another milestone; we're co-founding our 15th venture 🤘 It's awesome building new ventures from the ground up. It's why we started CFT in the first place. It always feels great to be at the start of the build phase, helping founders articulate a new venture’s tech and potential, building a strong narrative. We’re collaborating closely with founders to transform groundbreaking ideas into companies. 🚀🚀🚀 More to come on this. I'm hyped to share what we're building 🤘 #venturebuilder #deeptech #startups #cambridge

90

4 Comments

Taavet Hinrikus and I made the Financial Times Due Diligence email. https://lnkd.in/ez2AuGQx One 'unintended consequence' is that if there is a 45% tax on carry and CGT (raising £40m per year, remember) it for all intents and purposes closes the door on new VCs in the UK. Especially started by teams from non-traditional backgrounds. To meet the GP commit, you need to be already part of the 'wealthy' as you cannot rely on the value you create - nearly half of it will disappear - to fund it. We have both had extremely successful startups which are few and far between. The smaller number of new VCs will therefore more likely increasingly be for people who have inherited the capital or can draw it from their already rich family. Probably not want they have in mind with this policy.

32

2 Comments

The new pronouncements on AI are a big step in the right direction by Keir Starmer, but won't be successful unless the whole of government aligns policy making to optimise for technology and for growth, Rt Hon Rachel Reeves and HMRC included. https://lnkd.in/dcA5tN9d

23

2 Comments

A few reflections on last week's Budget, from me, and a bunch of our fabulous FieldHouse Associates' clients. https://lnkd.in/exrefrpt #tech #innovation #investment #venturecapital #startups #scaleups #regulation #government #PR #publicaffairs #consultancy

13

3 Comments

I spoke with Inc. Magazine about how VSS Capital Partners helped GreenSlate become the go-to payroll software provider for film and TV productions. When building a company as a founder, securing private equity is an important part of the growth journey. But so is having somebody who believes in you and has invested in your business. Finding the right PE Firm and partner who understands the mission and is supportive of it is hugely important to achieving success. Read more about how and why it all came together:

54

3 Comments

Liquidity or exit planning is often taboo leading to many companies being ill prepared. Successful outcomes are years in the making - they start and end with proactive prep (e.g. getting your house in order, developing strong relationships with strategic partners, potential investors and advisors). With Scott Colvin & Paul Perrett we lay out some key actions you should embed now that can set you up for exit success and also make you a better run business today Big thanks to Bree Fedele 🖋

55

6 Comments

What do you do when a radical new technology puts your main product right in the crosshairs of disruption? Listen to David Okuniev — co-founder of Typeform | Ask awesomely — discuss the challenges of innovation within existing structures. David shared a game-changing insight: Radical innovation is really, really difficult to do inside your own product. He emphasized the need to break free from the constraints of familiarity and embrace change from outside the box. Henrik Werdelin and I have both seen our fair share of this in our respective careers. What struck us most was how David leveraged structure to overcome the innovator’s dilemma. By creating a culture of experimentation and providing space for bold ideas, he propelled Typeform beyond incremental improvements. What other hacks have you seen or employed to help your organization overcome the innovator’s dilemma? Share your stories below! 👇 And if you want to dive deeper into our conversation, click the link in the comments to catch the full podcast episode!

4

2 Comments

Our #SXSW panel audience Q&A went on for so long they had to kick us out of the room! Thanks to Michael Kron, Casey Flint and Richard Cooney for a great discussion on what we all look for in founder characteristics. Investing in early stage companies is less about the product, which we know can and will pivot and change, and more about the founder (team) and the market opportunity. I loved the discussion on the confusing combination of paradoxical characteristics. For e.g. Startup founders should be bold risk-takers, but they should also avoid the cowboy mentality by backing their decisions with solid data and analysis. Would love to hear your thoughts on what makes a great founder! Sprint Ventures #founderdna

32

4 Comments

The #VentureStudio community is thriving and when two leaders from different studios get together it is always going to be a great conversation. This podcast is huge as two brilliant Venture Studio leaders Barry O'Reilly from Nobody Studios and Ben Yoskovitz from Highline Beta join to unpack the innovative world of venture studios and uncover the strategies that make startups thrive. In this episode, you will learn: 📈 The fundamentals of creating and scaling a venture studio 🛠️ Strategies for innovating with accelerators, incubators, and venture capital 💡 How to apply Lean Startup principles to build products people actually want 🤝 The importance of collaboration between founders, corporate partners, and investors 🔄 Insights into the specialization and future trends of venture studios Take a listen and learn from two masters.

11

3 Comments

Bolt's crazy #investmentterms seem to be all over the news today. More details were just sourced from The Information and Erin Woo. Any #investor that signs up for this set of terms, and valuation, should have their heads examined! What do you think? #management #venturcapital #privatequity #capitalmarkets #fintech

1

“The funding landscape has changed during the time we have been involved in it, and continues to evolve,” “And we’re evolving with it, to ensure that there is even more flexibility for companies to access the specific capital they need for a given scenario. We’ve funded well over 180 technology companies across multiple industries and verticals, and we’re not slowing down any time soon.” Regarding the total addressable market for Tractor to operate in, Imam explains that the one-funding-product-fits-all approach has required tweaking, simply due to the totally different needs expressed by the financial decision-makers, related to time, total access to the capital itself, and looming milestones that require a more strategic approach to accessing capital. “If you’re a SaaS company, or an ecommerce company, or a hardware company, or operating in a particular niche or vertical like marketing tech for example, you will have a different set of needs for funding based on your revenue,” explains Imam. “We’ve moved to a scenario-based funding model, based on the most common queries we receive at this point in time. B2B Enterprise SaaS we will always be able to fund in an instant. Other scenarios arise when the financials require a bit more flexible and bespoke assessment.” “In particular, our Inventory product points to our capability to fund in some very very specific and founder-focussed ways, and that flexibility really excites us, now and for the future.” Thank you for this write up SmartCompany!

37

4 Comments

The UK investment market allocates less than 1% to impact ventures. ...Let that figure sink in. So many of the brands we read about on LinkedIn are purpose-driven, and while they are rightly celebrated on the platform, the investment market is yet to catch up. Wondering why? Many institutions still believe that purpose and profit can't coexist. ❌ But the data shows that this is a myth. Our goal is to close this perception gap and fast-track impact founders towards investment. At Unrest, we've connected with 700+ purpose-led businesses, and supported 60 companies through four cohort programmes, we know what impact founders are capable of. That's why I'm so excited that we've launched the first round of Impact <> Investor Office Hours, an opportunity for 60 impact founders to pitch their businesses to an investor from Speedinvest, Seedcamp, Octopus Ventures Molten Ventures and many more in a 30-minute virtual session. Applications close this Friday 18th October – and it takes less than 10 minutes to apply. Get your application in now! (link in comments)

153

13 Comments

I posted last week about the shift in sentiment from LP's regarding secondaries. It used to be that GP's were told to hold their winners forever but more recently a lot of LP's are recommending pre-seed & seed stage VC's get good at navigating secondary transactions as early as Series B rounds. Obviously a lot of factors go into these decisions such as where you are in the life of the fund, how the rest of the portfolio is performing and the performance of the underlying company in question. But in this new reality, entry price and ownership relative to fund size really matter in order to still generate top decile funds by selling into later stage rounds; and that tends to be at odds with many seed fund strategies I see out there today. According to Carta, the average seed round valuation is $15M and I see some seed funds doing seed deals at $20M - $30M valuations. Many seed funds between $40M - $75M in size (avg of $50M) write seed checks at $15M valuations and probably invest $1.5M into each company to get 10%. The portfolio construction in this scenario is probably 20-25 companies given the check size. Assuming 50% dilution (probably low), you need a company to get to a $1B valuation to return your fund and you have less shots on goal to do that at a time where I think the probability of hitting a winner at seed for any single seed fund is going to go down per my post last week. It also means the opportunities to sell secondaries in later rounds in order to drive meaningful DPI is harder because it likely won't get to that sort of valuation until Series C or later; and you probably don't want to consider selling until the position is worth even more than your entire fund. Alternatively, if you write a $1M check into a deal at a $8M valuation out of a $50M fund, you are getting 12.5% ownership and probably investing in more like 30-35 companies given the initial check size. Higher ownership and more shots on goal. Assuming 50% dilution again, you get there with a $800M valuation. At even lower valuations, $1B outcomes would return multiples on the fund and it really opens up the options when it comes to selling in secondaries in order to manufacture liquidity. Given the current dynamics in the market, I wonder if more funds will start to focus on sub $10M valuation rounds.

64

3 Comments

How does an institutional LP decide which GPs to back? UTIMCO alum (and now partner at Foundry) Lindel Eakman opened up about how he picks on Samir Kaji's Venture Unlocked podcast 👇 (episode linked in comments) 🎣 "Would you trust them with your children?" Questions like this one tend to elicit genuine reactions and a real sense of a GP’s character and capabilities. Non-answers or silence in response to a pointed question like this one can be telling. 🤨 "Who fires who?" Questions like this help him evaluate governance and conflict resolution dynamics and the overall stability of the partnership. 1️⃣ Unlike some LPs, Lindel is very open to backing solo GPs. One of the reasons being that partnership risk -- which is one of the biggest when investing in VC funds -- is by definition, eliminated. 👍🏻 Lindel shies away from backing investors who may have potential to be top performers but are divisive or unpleasant to work with. Life is too short! Follow me - John Gannon - to learn more about the ins and outs of the VC market from all 3 sides of the table.

7

1 Comment

For Jason U. and me, being at Grand Central Tech has been game changing for Sunrise AI. The beautiful space is a boon, but integrating into the NYC tech ecosystem has been an absolute blessing -- more tangibly, there's 2 huge pluses: - the idea sharing when surrounded by all-star founders @ 22 Vanderbilt is incomparable; and - it's done wonders for our pipeline 😉 Run, don't walk (or rather click below) for the application: https://bit.ly/4abteEH

35

This scenario is more common than people think. It will also get worse as African venture sttuggle to raise money and accept unfavorable terms. Selling early or merging is not a bad outcome unless you want to eventually work for nothing. A great learning example on the importance of not just accepting any term sheet out of desperation. So many want to go to the media to announce and forget the minor details. The investor is also in business to win.

145

16 Comments

I really enjoyed breaking in our new studio to sit down with Temporal Technologies Co-Founders Samar Abbas and Maxim Fateev for the latest episode of Founded & Funded. Temporal was founded in 2019 based on an open-source microservices orchestration engine project but is the result of a more than decade-long partnership between the two co-founders that spanned their time working on different iterations of the same thing at AWS, Microsoft, and Uber. In this episode, Samar, Maxim, and I dive into the challenges of building an open-source ecosystem while also working on a commercial offering and scaling a successful company, how to navigate and adjust a product roadmap in an ever-changing world of AI and large language models, and how to successfully build an early startup team, navigate through a CEO transition, and bring on a startups first independent board member. It's a very compelling conversation and a must-listen for every builder out there. Watch the full episode on YouTube: https://lnkd.in/gymf9sES Find other platforms and the transcript on our website: https://lnkd.in/ggRtnKtM Be sure to subscribe to our channel for more deep dives into cutting-edge technologies and the minds behind them. Don't forget to like, comment, and share this conversation if you found it valuable!

73

3 Comments