We agree that there needs to be a clear delineation of roles not just between MPs and Senators, but for all elected representatives. If you employ someone, you give them a clear job description: "You are responsible for this, this, and this." Yet, despite having the 2010 Constitution, the roles and responsibilities of our elected leaders remain ambiguous. It’s not like there’s a simple checklist. For example, MPs are tasked with addressing "matters of concern" to the people. But what exactly are these matters? Who defines them? And what prevents MPs or Senators from overstepping into each other’s roles or worse, failing to deliver and blaming it on another office? Even though the Constitution provides a framework for these roles, it often lacks clarity on the extent of each leader’s mandate. Representation is broad but what does it truly mean? Where does the responsibility of an MP end and that of a Senator begin? Are these roles and responsibilities defined strictly by the Constitution, or do political manifestos play a role in shaping their responsibilities? So how do we ensure accountability when we don’t have a clear understanding of what our elected leaders are actually supposed to do and their responsibilities are vague. #Governance #Accountability #PeopleMatter
Who’s overstepping? MPs accuse Senators of staging a “coup” with big probes, but what does the 2010 Constitution say? #InfoTuesday