Improve consistency of module naming #383
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before 1.0 release, I think that we should ensure that our naming conventions are respected for both internal and public modules.
In this PR, I renamed:
The
Control.Optics
directory structure seemed a bit odd to me (but I haven't changed it yet), because it contains modules not ending with either.Linear
or.Linear.Internal.xxx
as this is the case in every other namespace. Should we rename something for this one?Closes #373 . Closes #380 .