Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rspack #22807

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024
Merged

Rspack #22807

merged 25 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

wendevlin
Copy link
Contributor

Breaking change

Proposed change

  • change from webpack to rspack

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (thank you!)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Example configuration

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue or discussion:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Build Related to building the code label Nov 13, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the GitHub Actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code label Nov 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the GitHub Actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code label Nov 14, 2024
@MindFreeze
Copy link
Contributor

MindFreeze commented Nov 19, 2024

I am getting these times for build_frontend:

Finished 'webpack-prod-app' after 3.35 min
Finished 'rspack-prod-app' after 1.3 min

And these for develop:

webpack Compiled successfully in 8.22s
rspack Compiled successfully in 5.60s

Live recompile is slower with rspack. 2-2.5s vs 0.6-0.7s for webpack. There seems to be some delay before rspack starts, so maybe this could be fixed if we find where the delay comes from.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Design Related to Home Assistant design gallery label Nov 21, 2024
@wendevlin wendevlin marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2024 10:32
MindFreeze
MindFreeze previously approved these changes Nov 22, 2024
@MindFreeze
Copy link
Contributor

The difference in bundle size with RegExp chunks is a bug in Rspack web-infra-dev/rspack#8529

@bramkragten bramkragten merged commit bd0bfc1 into dev Nov 26, 2024
15 checks passed
@bramkragten bramkragten deleted the rspack branch November 26, 2024 13:49
@@ -168,10 +170,14 @@ const createWebpackConfig = ({
stats: { assets: true, chunks: true, modules: true },
transform: (stats) => JSON.stringify(filterStats(stats)),
}),
!latestBuild &&
new TransformAsyncModulesPlugin({
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does rspack properly transpile TLA for the legacy build? I don't see anything about target support in their docs.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAICT, rspack has the same problem that webpack does. There are now a bunch of async functions in the legacy build that will cause errors on older browsers.

I'm not sure why this plugin was removed, but it should probably be added back.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

... or #23234 and then the transform isn't needed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It wasn't supported by rspack, I removed it and tested it with browser stack if it is necessary. Maybe I did a mistake here, will check again or your solution solves it 🙂

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No worries... you probably just didn't test anything that was old enough to not support async functions. It's moot now that #23234 is merged.

I wrote that plugin so I'll have to see if I can quickly make it compatible with rspack for others.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Webpackbar did a rspack update, maybe you can take this as inspiration:

@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ const createRspackConfig = ({
chunks: !isProdBuild
? // improve incremental build speed, but blows up bundle size
new RegExp(
`^(?!.*(${Object.keys(entry).join("|")}|work(?:er|let))$)`
`^(?!(${Object.keys(entry).join("|")}|.*work(?:er|let))$)`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we treating production and development builds differently? Looks like the regex is trying to accomplish the same thing for the modern build, but will give a different result for the legacy build? 😕

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We had troubles with the incremental build speed, so we found this solution but it fucks up all our chunks so for prod we still use the js lambda. Yeah you are right, maybe we should also disable this for legacyBuild

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Build Related to building the code cla-signed Design Related to Home Assistant design gallery
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants