Why deepseq infix revert?

[phadej]

1.4.6.1

Revert infixr 0 deepseq; this is a breaking change and requires a major version bump

It has been discussed in #56, https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2020-April/030361.html

I also remember (but fail to find discussions) that this change is one where not adhering to SHOULD in PVP is justified. The major bump in deepseq version library would (especially now) make people angry for no reason, and the change doesn't break anything, as deepseq combinator cannot be meaningfully chained with its current infixl 9.

[mixphix]

If you think this is justifiably minor-release-worthy, I'll add it to 1.4.7.0 before it gets pinned to GHC here.

[phadej]

Christiaan's example is very convincing. I find hard time coming up with an example where changing fixity would break things.

OTOH, doing a search on Hackage shows that there are many packages
which define NFData instances like:

yarr

instance Shape sh => NFData (UArray CV CVL sh a) where
    rnf (Convoluted sh tch iforce bget center cget) =
        sh `deepseq` tch `seq` iforce `seq`
            bget `seq` center `deepseq` cget `seq` ()
    {-# INLINE rnf #-}

or windns

instance NFData DnsRecord where
  rnf (DnsRecord n y t d) = n `deepseq` y `deepseq` t `deepseq` d `deepseq` ()

or vty

instance NFData Image where
  rnf EmptyImage = ()
  rnf (CropRight i w h) = i `deepseq` w `seq` h `seq` ()
  rnf (CropLeft i s w h) = i `deepseq` s `seq` w `seq` h `seq` ()
  rnf (CropBottom i w h) = i `deepseq` w `seq` h `seq` ()

or haddock

rnf doc = case doc of
  DocEmpty                  -> ()
  DocAppend a b             -> a `deepseq` b `deepseq` ()

None of these would break, but I'd argue instead work as a reader
would think of, forcing things left-to-right.

The yarr example is interesting as it's currently

    rnf (Convoluted sh tch iforce bget center cget) =
        (sh `deepseq` tch) `seq` iforce `seq`
            bget `seq` (center `deepseq` cget) `seq` ()

which works, but i'm sure not what the author intended.

---

There are also few occurences which look like:

x `deepseq` f x $ y

or

x `deepseq` f x $! y

which will still work as $ and $! are infixr 0 themselves.

[mixphix]

Added in v1.4.7.0.