eprintid: 95638 rev_number: 14 eprint_status: archive userid: 11283 dir: disk0/00/09/56/38 datestamp: 2014-08-04 08:22:18 lastmod: 2021-09-23 23:00:21 status_changed: 2014-08-04 08:22:18 type: article metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Nolan, D.R. creators_name: Gower, A.L. creators_name: Destrade, M. creators_name: Ogden, R.W. creators_name: McGarry, J.P. creators_orcid: 0000-0002-7002-7028 title: A robust anisotropic hyperelastic formulation for the modelling of soft tissue ispublished: pub divisions: 30501000 abstract: The Holzapfel–Gasser–Ogden (HGO) model for anisotropic hyperelastic behaviour of collagen fibre reinforced materials was initially developed to describe the elastic properties of arterial tissue, but is now used extensively for modelling a variety of soft biological tissues. Such materials can be regarded as incompressible, and when the incompressibility condition is adopted the strain energy Ψ of the HGO model is a function of one isotropic and two anisotropic deformation invariants. A compressible form (HGO-C model) is widely used in finite element simulations whereby the isotropic part of Ψ is decoupled into volumetric and isochoric parts and the anisotropic part of Ψ is expressed in terms of isochoric invariants. Here, by using three simple deformations (pure dilatation, pure shear and uniaxial stretch), we demonstrate that the compressible HGO-C formulation does not correctly model compressible anisotropic material behaviour, because the anisotropic component of the model is insensitive to volumetric deformation due to the use of isochoric anisotropic invariants. In order to correctly model compressible anisotropic behaviour we present a modified anisotropic (MA) model, whereby the full anisotropic invariants are used, so that a volumetric anisotropic contribution is represented. The MA model correctly predicts an anisotropic response to hydrostatic tensile loading, whereby a sphere deforms into an ellipsoid. It also computes the correct anisotropic stress state for pure shear and uniaxial deformation. To look at more practical applications, we developed a finite element user-defined material subroutine for the simulation of stent deployment in a slightly compressible artery. Significantly higher stress triaxiality and arterial compliance are computed when the full anisotropic invariants are used (MA model) instead of the isochoric form (HGO-C model). date: 2014-11 date_type: published publisher: Elsevier id_number: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.016 official_url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.016 uniqueid: glaseprints:2014-95638 published_online: 2014-07-11 issn_online: 1878-0180 full_text_status: none publication: Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials volume: 39 pagerange: 48-60 refereed: TRUE issn: 1751-6161 hoa_compliant: 305 hoa_date_pub: 2014-11 hoa_exclude: FALSE hoa_gold: FALSE citation: Nolan, D.R., Gower, A.L., Destrade, M., Ogden, R.W. and McGarry, J.P. (2014) A robust anisotropic hyperelastic formulation for the modelling of soft tissue. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials , 39, pp. 48-60. (doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.016 )