Corcoran, D. et al. (2021) Vascular effects of serelaxin in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Cardiovascular Research, 117(1), pp. 320-329. (doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz345) (PMID:32065620) (PMCID:PMC7797213)
![]() |
Text
207715.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 951kB |
Abstract
Aims: The effects of serelaxin, a recombinant form of human relaxin-2 peptide, on vascular function in the coronary microvascular and systemic macrovascular circulation remain largely unknown. This mechanistic, clinical study assessed the effects of serelaxin on myocardial perfusion, aortic stiffness, and safety in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and results: In this multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, 58 patients were randomized 1:1 to 48 h intravenous infusion of serelaxin (30 µg/kg/day) or matching placebo. The primary endpoints were change from baseline to 47 h post-initiation of the infusion in global myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) assessed using adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and applanation tonometry-derived augmentation index (AIx). Secondary endpoints were: change from baseline in AIx and pulse wave velocity, assessed at 47 h, Day 30, and Day 180; aortic distensibility at 47 h; pharmacokinetics and safety. Exploratory endpoints were the effect on cardiorenal biomarkers [N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), endothelin-1, and cystatin C]. Of 58 patients, 51 were included in the primary analysis (serelaxin, n = 25; placebo, n = 26). After 2 and 6 h of serelaxin infusion, mean placebo-corrected blood pressure reductions of −9.6 mmHg (P = 0.01) and −13.5 mmHg (P = 0.0003) for systolic blood pressure and −5.2 mmHg (P = 0.02) and −8.4 mmHg (P = 0.001) for diastolic blood pressure occurred. There were no between-group differences from baseline to 47 h in global MPR (−0.24 vs. −0.13, P = 0.44) or AIx (3.49% vs. 0.04%, P = 0.21) with serelaxin compared with placebo. Endothelin-1 and cystatin C levels decreased from baseline in the serelaxin group, and there were no clinically relevant changes observed with serelaxin for NT-proBNP or hsTnT. Similar numbers of serious adverse events were observed in both groups (serelaxin, n = 5; placebo, n = 7) to 180-day follow-up. Conclusion: In patients with stable CAD, 48 h intravenous serelaxin reduced blood pressure but did not alter myocardial perfusion.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Berry, Professor Colin and Corcoran, Dr David and Mordi, Dr Ify and Radjenovic, Dr Aleksandra |
Authors: | Corcoran, D., Radjenovic, A., Mordi, I., Nazir, S. A., Wilson, S. J., Hinder, M., Yates, D. P., Machineni, S., Alcantara, J., Prescott, M. F., Gugliotta, B., Pang, Y., Tzemos, N., Semple, S. I., Newby, D. E., McCann, G. P., Squire, I., and Berry, C. |
College/School: | College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health |
Journal Name: | Cardiovascular Research |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
ISSN: | 0008-6363 |
ISSN (Online): | 1755-3245 |
Published Online: | 17 February 2020 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2020 The Authors |
First Published: | First published in Cardiovascular Research 117(1): 320-329 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced under a Creative Commons license |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record