Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seeed Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 14:22, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seeed Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unambiguous Promotion. CSD tags repeatedly removed by author of article (logged in and logged out). Exemplo347 (talk) 10:13, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Exemplo347 (talk) 10:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete – thanks for nominating this, I was about to report the IP for vandalism. I suggest the page be salted as articles like these are usually recreated. Laurdecl ^talk 10:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - I saw the messy edit history and decided to follow a deletion process that isn't as easy for logged-out editors to disrupt. As you say, salting is probably a good idea too. Exemplo347 (talk) 10:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete– I concur with the above comments it is Promotional. FITINDIA (talk) 14:47, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete – This is unambiguously promotional and speedy process has been repeatedly disrupted. Alex Cohn (talk) 16:04, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Delete as clear advertisement. SwisterTwister talk 18:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per all the reasons above - very clearly promotionalism and advertising. -- Dane ^talk 01:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete nothing is here! Light2021 (talk) 20:16, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.