Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lidy López

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lidy López

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability guidelines, I only see a couple articles mentioning the person, but no substantial coverage. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:49, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:49, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was debating about nominating this myself, I agree that it fails relevant notability guidelines. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 08:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth sourcing from independent reliable sources to show they pass WP:GNG, and definitely doesn't pass WP:NACTOR, in fact some of the claims made in the article are totally unsourced. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG, sourcing is questionable on this as well. Agree with nom - passing mentions but not substantial coverage. -- Dane ^talk 19:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:ACTOR and WP:CS. Only credits are "himself" in unknown shows. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FSOJM791 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.