Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Tedros

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that this passes WP:NFOOTBALL (non-admin closure) -- Dane talk 01:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham Tedros (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:57, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 09:57, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 09:57, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 09:57, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My understanding of WP:NFOOTBALL appears to be different. "in a competitive senior international match at confederation level" - It appears Tedros has only competed in regional tournaments within Africa, which would seem to indicate failing WP:NFOOTBALL. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The CECAFA Cup matches would appear to be FIFA sanctioned matches according to NFT. Even so, he also played in two World Cup qualifiers for Eritrea in 2011 according to NFT and Soccerway which would certainly pass WP:NFOOTBALL. Kosack (talk) 15:11, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 12:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The source which mentions him scoring a goal is a trivial mention, i.e. not enough to meet WP:GNG. If that interview is online, a link would be appreciated so we can check it. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 12:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
GNG requires in-depth coverage. As I mentioned above, NFOOTBALL is a presumption, and a scorecard mention (literally only his name and the time in the game [90' or 89', sources don't quite agree] when he scored) of scoring a goal is rather WP:TRIVIALMENTION... 198.84.253.202 (talk) 02:08, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, the nominator mentioned WP:NFOOTBALL for the reason of AfD nomination. The player passes for this. And second, coverage should not only based on google search result, especially when language becomes a barrier, or in a country where most news is availble in paper-based version, not available online. Then perhaps better to say, it cannot decided he passes GNG or not, for now. But surely he passes NFOOTBALL, which is the reason of this AfD nomination --Fathul.mahdariza (talk) 10:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.