Talk:Nurhak

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nurhak article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Turkey Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Nurhak be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Should the demography section be deleted?

The sources are over 20 years old Chidgk1 (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most articles on Wikipedia use references that are relatively old. Its common usage on Wikipedia. Semsûrî (talk) 19:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depends what for - sometimes old sources are still useful sometimes not.

In 20 years I expect many people will have died, been born or moved in or out of the district Chidgk1 (talk) 06:20, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you have experienced pushback twice please stop adding that template. A reference from 2002 is not outdated, unless you have a more recent source that states that the circumstances have changed. Semsûrî (talk) 15:23, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will now take this article off my watchlist as the discussion is a bit silly - for example I see from the Umutlu, Nurhak article that only 58 people lived there in 2022. I have never been to the place but I doubt anyone reading this article cares whether whoever lived there 20 years previously called themselves Turks or Kurds or any other ethnic group. Neither the Turkish nor the Kurdish articles on Nurhak mention ethnicity. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]