Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix and Winslow: Difference between revisions
Daveosaurus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
checked |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|checked}} |
||
=====<big>08 November 2011</big>===== |
=====<big>08 November 2011</big>===== |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
The two named accounts, plus P&W are all {{unlikely}} to be related to each other. Looking back (and correct me if I'm wrong), it was never established that P&W had any alternate accounts. There were some "possible" matches, but nothing concrete. There are accounts ''tagged'' as P&W, but I'm can't see why. <font color="darkorange">[[User:Tnxman307|TN]]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>[[User talk:Tnxman307|X]]</big></font></b><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Tnxman307|Man]]</font> 19:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 19:50, 8 November 2011
Phoenix and Winslow
Phoenix and Winslow (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix and Winslow/Archive.
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
08 November 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Cowboysforever (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Liangshan Yi (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Two more single-edit accounts whose only contribution has been to back P&W up in his/her attempts to disrupt the talk page at Ugg boots. This fits the modus operandi of confirmed sock puppets such as Bigdog2828 and Barclaygla09. Daveosaurus (talk) 19:01, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The two named accounts, plus P&W are all 
Unlikely to be related to each other. Looking back (and correct me if I'm wrong), it was never established that P&W had any alternate accounts. There were some "possible" matches, but nothing concrete. There are accounts tagged as P&W, but I'm can't see why. TNXMan 19:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC)