Jump to content

Wikipedia:Proposed article splits: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
NEW REQUESTS: , forgot to add this before. I should add it here
Tag: Reverted
NEW REQUESTS: , withdrawn because of a jerk who edits LGBT pages
Line 52: Line 52:


*'''Split''' ''[[Forged in Fire (TV series)|Forged in Fire]]'' into ''[[Forged in Fire (TV series)|Forged in Fire]]'' and [[List of Forged in Fire episodes|List of ''Forged in Fire'' episodes]]. With all the season/episode tables, the article is extremely lengthy. The long tables also detract from the series' flow of production information, etc. See the discussion on the talk page: [[Talk:Forged in Fire (TV series)#2021: Episode list (split_off)|split]]. If it helps speed up the support process, the proposed draft can be reviewed at [[Draft:List of Forged in Fire episodes]]. [[User:CYAce01|CYAce01]] ([[User talk:CYAce01|talk]]) 17:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Split''' ''[[Forged in Fire (TV series)|Forged in Fire]]'' into ''[[Forged in Fire (TV series)|Forged in Fire]]'' and [[List of Forged in Fire episodes|List of ''Forged in Fire'' episodes]]. With all the season/episode tables, the article is extremely lengthy. The long tables also detract from the series' flow of production information, etc. See the discussion on the talk page: [[Talk:Forged in Fire (TV series)#2021: Episode list (split_off)|split]]. If it helps speed up the support process, the proposed draft can be reviewed at [[Draft:List of Forged in Fire episodes]]. [[User:CYAce01|CYAce01]] ([[User talk:CYAce01|talk]]) 17:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

*'''Split''' Content from the [[Media portrayal of LGBT people]] page onto the [[LGBT children's television programming]] page. It would be best that the "LGBT representation in children's media" section in the main article be split and moved to the LGBT children's television programming page. We don't want duplication of information and that page is much better sourced, and organized. See discussion [[Talk:Media portrayal of LGBT people#Proposed split / merging|here]]. [[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 14:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


<!-- List ends here. Please place your NEW REQUEST directly above this line. -->
<!-- List ends here. Please place your NEW REQUEST directly above this line. -->

Revision as of 06:30, 27 February 2021

This is the page to make requests for the splitting of an article into two or more separate articles.

This process is usually undertaken to keep articles from becoming too large or unfocused; but may also occur when an element of an existing article gains substantial notoriety in its own right. In such a case, requests for splitting-off said content from an existing article into a newer, stand-alone article, should be directed here. After familiarizing yourself with the splitting process, please make your requests for article splitting below. We will also attempt to get more people to comment on proposals, however, if the split is contested or potentially controversial, it may be best to run the discussion through Requests for Comment or Articles for Creation instead of here.

All split comments and discussions should be directed to the "discussion" subsection of the Original Article's Talk Page, NOT here.


Note

Splits of CATEGORIES should not be proposed here. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.
Splits of TEMPLATES should not be proposed here. Please see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion.
MERGING of ARTICLES should not be proposed here. Please see Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers.

Split requests

If you need assistance with proposing a split, list it below and someone will make sure it's properly listed. Note that this will not get the split completed, as there may be a backlog, and splits often require considerably more discussion than, for instance, a merge request. To request a split, list the article below as well as requested target article title(s). Include a short descriptive reason why you think a split is in order. Please sign your request(s). Thank you.

Making a request

If you need assistance with proposing a split, list it below in "NEW REQUESTS" and someone will make sure it's properly listed. Note that this will not get the split completed on its own. After a split is listed properly, move it to the "Answered requests" or "Awaiting consensus" sections below as appropriate. Please list new requests at the bottom of the section. Use the edit summary and list at least a link to the original article. Please legitimize your request by signing each listing or comment by typing four tildes (~~~~). Unsigned requests can not be honored.

To request your split, copy the following template, paste it at the bottom of the NEW REQUESTS section, and fill in (replace) the article titles specific to your request. (NOTE: Often the original article name and one of the preferred new names are the same. However, at least one of the preferred new name(s) should appear red.) Indicate if your request will involve Page Moves, creating Disambiguation Page(s), or any other related work. Also, please indicate if you are willing to do the split if such a consensus is reached.

Template
*'''Split''' [[Original article name]] into [[Split-article preferred new name 1]] and [[Split-article preferred new name 2]].  If agreed, I {will} {cannot} do the split.  See discussion at [[Talk:Original article#Proposed split]]. ~~~~

NEW REQUESTS

______


AWAITING CONSENSUS

After the involved article is tagged for the split discussion, the request should be added at (or moved to) the bottom of this section. This section can also be used if a proposal needs further discussion due to age, disagreement, or lack of consensus.

______
Comment Ongoing discussion has not yet reached a consensus. GenQuest "scribble" 19:33, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
______

ARTICLES TO BE SPLIT

After discussion concludes, completed requests indicating SPLIT is to be carried out should be moved below (to the bottom of this list). Notate as {{Working}}

______


______

ARCHIVED and REJECTED Split Requests

When article discussion and split has been completed (if closed as proceed), notate and move the request to the TOP of the following ARCHIVED list. Articles that have been rejected for splitting should go here directly from the AWAITING CONSENSUS list. Please notate both types as {{Done}}, or {{Not done}}.

 Not done Consensus is against a split. GenQuest "scribble" 19:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Moot Request withdrawn following standard copy editting. GenQuest "scribble" 19:43, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Minor, small article on defunct 2 season show does not qualify for would result in two perma-stubs. GenQuest "scribble" 19:07, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Request is unsigned and no discussion was started. GenQuest "scribble" 18:54, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Not Done Consensus is against a split at this time; a BOLD split did take place, however, and remains. GenQuest "scribble" 18:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@GenQuest: Already split in July - consensus was actually for keeping the article after the split: Talk:Black Lives Matter Plaza. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 18:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done by Move & Disambiguation by interested editor. GenQuest "scribble" 18:41, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Only comment after months is opposed to requested split. Pinging proposer, @TagaSanPedroAko: GenQuest "scribble" 18:22, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Stale proposal with no input after 10 months, Proposer, SMcCandlish may wish to go BOLD and do a split. Good luck. GenQuest "scribble" 18:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done stale and stalled proposal getting little input. Try again down the road. GenQuest "scribble" 18:00, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Only weak opposition expressed; closed; may survive a BOLD split by proposer, SMcCandlish. GenQuest "scribble" 18:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Old Archives

Split article requests: 2019 and 2020 completion archives
 Working Update: United States v. Flynn is now in the mainspace. Relevant notices were posted (e.g., re: copying, and inviting editors from Michael Flynn, Emmet G. Sullivan and WikiProject Law) to contribute, and a notice has been posted to Michael Flynn re: the need to trim content there, as it wasn't possible to carry out a clean split from that page, given the organization of the content on that page and the desire to keep some info about the case there -- FactOrOpinion (talk) 14:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "scribble" 17:41, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done GenQuest "scribble" 15:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done
 Done. The history merge has been completed by Anthony Appleyard, and the split is finished. — Newslinger talk 17:29, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also