dbo:abstract
|
- Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980), is a United States Supreme Court case involving issues of privacy in correspondence with the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, the freedom of the press, the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. After a murder case ended in three mistrials, the judge closed the fourth trial to the public and the press. On appeal, the Supreme Court ruled the closing to be in violation of the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment asserting that the First Amendment implicitly guarantees the press access to public trials. (en)
|
dbo:thumbnail
| |
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 14868 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-02-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, (en)
|
dbp:concurrence
|
- Stewart (en)
- White (en)
- Stevens (en)
- Brennan (en)
- Blackmun (en)
|
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-07-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
| |
dbp:docket
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia (en)
|
dbp:holding
|
- Closing of the trial to the public in this case was unconstitutional. (en)
|
dbp:joinconcurrence
| |
dbp:joinplurality
| |
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia (en)
|
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:notparticipating
| |
dbp:oralargument
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:plurality
| |
dbp:subsequent
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980), is a United States Supreme Court case involving issues of privacy in correspondence with the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, the freedom of the press, the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. After a murder case ended in three mistrials, the judge closed the fourth trial to the public and the press. On appeal, the Supreme Court ruled the closing to be in violation of the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment asserting that the First Amendment implicitly guarantees the press access to public trials. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:depiction
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |