dbo:abstract
|
- Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1991] UKHL 10 is an English land law case, confirming and explaining the requirements of certainty of duration of any lease. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 4804 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:citations
|
- [1991] UKHL 10 (en)
- [1992] 2 AC 386 (en)
- [1992] 3 All ER 504 (en)
- [1992] 3 WLR 279 (en)
|
dbp:court
| |
dbp:dateDecided
| |
dbp:fullName
|
- Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body and others (en)
|
dbp:keywords
|
- Lease; certainty of duration; invalidity of lease; until...required "lease"; creation of ransom strip (en)
|
dbp:name
|
- Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body (en)
|
dbp:opinions
|
- Held: a lease must be limited to expire by the effluxion of time . The expressed lease "until the strip of land is needed for road-widening" is not a valid lease in law. (en)
|
dbp:priorActions
|
- Appellant won at first instance . Appellant lost in the Court of Appeal . (en)
|
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1991] UKHL 10 is an English land law case, confirming and explaining the requirements of certainty of duration of any lease. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |