An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Mooreheadwas the last of a series of cases in which members of a cartel, described as the "Coal Vend" were prosecuted under the Australian Industries Preservation Act. The majority of the High Court held that the investigation power was spent once a prosecution had commenced and that under the Act, a corporation could not be required to answer questions. While the decision was based on the wording of the specific legislation, its ongoing significance is its foundation for the requirement that the government act as a model litigant.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Mooreheadwas the last of a series of cases in which members of a cartel, described as the "Coal Vend" were prosecuted under the Australian Industries Preservation Act. The majority of the High Court held that the investigation power was spent once a prosecution had commenced and that under the Act, a corporation could not be required to answer questions. While the decision was based on the wording of the specific legislation, its ongoing significance is its foundation for the requirement that the government act as a model litigant. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 54242613 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 27641 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1100110585 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:court
dbp:dateDecided
  • 1912-10-21 (xsd:date)
dbp:judges
dbp:name
  • The Melbourne Steamship Company Limited v Moorehead (en)
dbp:priorActions
  • 0001-04-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Mooreheadwas the last of a series of cases in which members of a cartel, described as the "Coal Vend" were prosecuted under the Australian Industries Preservation Act. The majority of the High Court held that the investigation power was spent once a prosecution had commenced and that under the Act, a corporation could not be required to answer questions. While the decision was based on the wording of the specific legislation, its ongoing significance is its foundation for the requirement that the government act as a model litigant. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Moorehead (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License