An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 (2000), was a US Supreme Court case that determined that the US Congress's enforcement powers under the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution did not extend to the abrogation of state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment over complaints of discrimination that is rationally based on age.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 (2000), was a US Supreme Court case that determined that the US Congress's enforcement powers under the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution did not extend to the abrogation of state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment over complaints of discrimination that is rationally based on age. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 6522675 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 9966 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1077582927 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-10-13 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1999 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent
  • Thomas (en)
  • Stevens (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-01-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2000 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • J. Daniel Kimel, Jr. et al. v. Florida Board of Regents et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • The U.S. Congress's enforcement powers under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution do not extend to the abrogation of state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment over complaints of discrimination that is rationally based on age. Therefore, private litigants cannot obtain money damages from the states for violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence/dissent
  • Kennedy (en)
  • Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas ; Rehnquist, Stevens, Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • O'Connor (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:uspage
  • 62 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 528 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 (2000), was a US Supreme Court case that determined that the US Congress's enforcement powers under the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution did not extend to the abrogation of state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment over complaints of discrimination that is rationally based on age. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • J. Daniel Kimel, Jr. et al. v. Florida Board of Regents et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License