dbo:abstract
|
- Goold v Collins and Ors [2004] IESC 38, [2004] 7 JIC 1201 is an Irish Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a statutory provision's constitutionality may be reviewed only at the behest of a litigant who is contesting some current application of that provision. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 6205 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:appealedFrom
| |
dbp:appealedTo
| |
dbp:caption
| |
dbp:court
| |
dbp:dateDecided
| |
dbp:decisionBy
|
- Mr Justice Adrian Hardiman (en)
|
dbp:fullName
|
- Eileen Goold v. Mary Collins, A Judge of the Dublin Metropolitan District Court and the Director of Public Prosecutions, Ireland and the Attorney General and John Joseph Gallagher. (en)
|
dbp:italicTitle
| |
dbp:judges
| |
dbp:keywords
| |
dbp:name
|
- Goold v. Collins & Others (en)
|
dbp:numberOfJudges
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Goold v Collins and Ors [2004] IESC 38, [2004] 7 JIC 1201 is an Irish Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a statutory provision's constitutionality may be reviewed only at the behest of a litigant who is contesting some current application of that provision. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Goold v Collins and Ors (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |