An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Druker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 697 F.2d 46 (2d Cir. 1982), is a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the constitutionality of the marriage penalty. The plaintiffs, James O. Druker and his wife Joan, claimed that the "income tax structure unfairly discriminates against working married couples" in violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Druker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 697 F.2d 46 (2d Cir. 1982), is a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the constitutionality of the marriage penalty. The plaintiffs, James O. Druker and his wife Joan, claimed that the "income tax structure unfairly discriminates against working married couples" in violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 36095948 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2620 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1088197514 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-09-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1982 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • 17280.0
dbp:citations
  • 17280.0
dbp:court
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:courtseal
  • Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.svg (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-12-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1982 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • James O. Druker and Joan S. Druker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • a unanimous court (en)
dbp:judges
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Druker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (en)
dbp:majority
  • Friendly (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Google Scholar (en)
  • OpenJurist (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:prior
  • 77 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Druker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 697 F.2d 46 (2d Cir. 1982), is a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the constitutionality of the marriage penalty. The plaintiffs, James O. Druker and his wife Joan, claimed that the "income tax structure unfairly discriminates against working married couples" in violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Druker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License