dbo:abstract
|
- Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States "[held] that searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule". (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 2145 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-03-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Davis v. United States, (en)
|
dbp:concurrence
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
| |
dbp:docket
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Willie Gene Davis v. United States (en)
|
dbp:holding
|
- : Searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule. (en)
|
dbp:joindissent
| |
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Kagan (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- Davis v. United States (en)
|
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oralargument
| |
dbp:otherSource
| |
dbp:otherUrl
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States "[held] that searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule". (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Davis v. United States (2011) (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Willie Gene Davis v. United States (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |