dbo:abstract
|
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., 532 U.S. 424 (2001), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the standard of review that Federal Appeal Courts should use when examining punitive damages awards. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 6660 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-02-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., (en)
|
dbp:concurrence
| |
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-05-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. (en)
|
dbp:holding
|
- Courts of Appeals should apply a de novo standard when reviewing district court determinations of the constitutionality of punitive damages awards. The Ninth Circuit erred in applying the less demanding abuse-of-discretion standard in this case. (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- Cooper Industries v. Leatherman Tool Group (en)
|
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., 532 U.S. 424 (2001), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the standard of review that Federal Appeal Courts should use when examining punitive damages awards. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |