Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P • COM:RFPP

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

Note

  • For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
  • Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.


Self Block for Wikibreak

Seyamar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) I need to take a wikibreak till 1 April 2025, since there is no wikibreak enforcer here, I would request an administrator to block my editing till 1 April 2025, (also 245CMR is the previous name of this account), Thanks, .245CMR.👥📜 04:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@245CMR: perhaps try en:WP:BREAKENF. Regards, Aafi (talk) 05:12, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Blocked for 3 months. Yann (talk) 10:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i hear that was not allowed. why did you blocked him? @Yann modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 13:21, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What was not allowed? Where did you hear that? Yann (talk) 13:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipedi:Engelleme_politikas%C4%B1#Engellemenin_kullan%C4%B1lamayaca%C4%9F%C4%B1_durumlar modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 14:52, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I don't know Turkish. And rules there are not necessarily the same as on Commons. Yann (talk) 15:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok😑 modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 16:18, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated reuploads of out-of-scope content, cf. Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GreyViper17. Omphalographer (talk) 04:37, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Was not formally warned before, so only one week block. All files deleted. Should be blocked indef. if such uploads continue. Yann (talk) 09:12, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion. Same contributions and uploads as Scania117 (talk · contribs). Ratekreel (talk) 08:58, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked, files deleted. Yann (talk) 09:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

duck🦆

i dont wanna create checkuser request for that. you can see how these two account are clearly sockpuppet. please check: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ANGENOIRCLUB - Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tresor MINENGU . User talk:Tresor MINENGU User talk:ANGENOIRCLUB @Tresor MINENGU , @ANGENOIRCLUB . modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 13:19, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Files deleted, sock blocked, main account warned. This one should also be blocked if such uploads continue. Yann (talk) 15:53, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to upload copyrighted film posters after several warnings. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done There wasn't any formal warning (now done), so I won't block now. All files deleted. Yann (talk) 20:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting protection about File:Star full.svg

This file is very popular in enwiki (227234 used on all wiki projects) Manu1400 (talk) 09:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Semi-protected for a year, tests/vandalism reverted. Yann (talk) 09:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: , Could you add (again) [[Category:Evaluation scales using stars (empty to full, 1)|1/]] ? Manu1400 (talk) 09:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK done. That was broken. Yann (talk) 10:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting protection on both of these files which have recently come under heavy edit warring. Any constructive edit by citing sources is instantly reverted on both these files. Multitude of users are changing how the control of this country should look like depending on their preference, without citing any source, what-so-ever. I believe auto patrol protection would stop the edit warring, and allow constructive editing, mainly citing sources, to take place.

Just to give an example on how ridiculous this file has gotten, it currently asserts that one of the Syrian rebel groups, RCA, controls 1/3rd of the country, even the capital Damascus. Despite the fact that this group has just 500 fighters. Ecrusized (talk) 11:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done @Ecrusized: I have protected both the files for one month after which the files will be automatically un-protected. As I don't have any interest in the subject, I won't be doing any accuracy checks on these files. Regards, Aafi (talk) 12:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:浪速丹治

Although receiving many copyvio deletions and one-month block, this user repeatedly uploaded the same copyvio toy doll's pictures; File:フランソワ彼女.jpg, File:フランソワ嬢.jpg, File:フランソワちゃん.jpg, File:フランソワ嬢.jpg and File:彼女.jpg. Netora (talk) 12:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done The block was for a week, now a month. Yann (talk) 13:22, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted multiple images about toilets with "screenshot" in metadata. Taivo (talk) 17:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RowanJ LP is edit warring, [1][2] and pushing for versions of the files that do not cite any sources, they also appear to be taking credit for other user's works like File:Syrian opposition map November 2024.svg. I suggest this user be temporarily blocked to stop their edit warring. Ecrusized (talk) 13:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one who isn't properly citing things either? As explained in my talk page, you're not doing things properly. RowanJ LP (talk) 13:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is also consensus on English Wikipedia that user RowanJ LP's edits should be reverted. But because of their edit warring, this has become impossible. Ecrusized (talk) 13:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed*, simple misunderstanding from my editing should be fixed according to consensus. RowanJ LP (talk) 13:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User reverting files to older revisions without leaving edit summaries. Ecrusized (talk) 15:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

我只是恢復以前版本而已,因為兩人有爭議,理論上要恢復更過去版本,等爭論結束,還有我中文維基百科,不可能都知道任何語言維基百科做出哪個決定 HYHJKJYUJYTTY (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My English is bad HYHJKJYUJYTTY (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
而且只退回一次,怎麼能判斷我在破壞呢? HYHJKJYUJYTTY (talk) 15:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done reporter blocked. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious troll? Bastique ☎ let's talk! 18:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes Bedivere (talk) 18:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So do we block them? Bastique ☎ let's talk! 23:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done -blocked They uploaded another swastika. I'm just unsure of what to put on their page. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 03:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lower protection for File:Map-TurkicLanguages.png

File:Map-TurkicLanguages.png was full protected in 2013 by User:Hedwig in Washington. Since they haven't edited here since 2022, it would appear impractical to ask them on their talk page to lower protection.

I've received a request at COM:OWR Commons:Overwriting existing files/Requests#Allow overwriting of File:Map-TurkicLanguages.png to add a revision that adds Kosovo to the list of minority Turkish speaking countries. So should protection be lowered to autoconfirm and I add the template or should it be lowered to autopatroller so this edit request could be done by an autopatroller? Abzeronow (talk) 22:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest given its history we step it down to autopatroller and keep an eye on it. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 23:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done It is now autopatroller protected. Abzeronow (talk) 19:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite protection request

Hello, this Triplec85 rfa request was closed yesterday (even though it should've closed today since the candidate accepted the nomination the day after) but was not protected, please indefinitely protect it. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 07:14, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Yann (talk) 16:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this Taivo put protection to avoid my speedy delete request in this photo. Please remove the protection in this photo to make it edit again. Thank you!!! Toniker0501 (talk) 10:18, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose. The photo about long-dead important politician has educational value. Taivo (talk) 12:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm so sorry Taivo regarding my invalid reason to delete the photo. Please remove the protection from his photo. I will promise to you that I will not repeat my mistake. Toniker0501 (talk) 13:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Taivo please accept his request to remove your putting protection for File:Jose B. Lingad.jpg. Thank you!!! TheJediMaster327 (talk) 15:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose "Please delete this photo permanently because this photo is too much blurred." is not a valid rationale for speedy deletion. I'm not sure protecting the page is the best option if there is only one user targeting it though; if they've already been told that their action is inappropriate (which I have just done in a talk page message) and they continue to repeat it, a block might be a better solution here. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 12:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can we compromise by allowing Toniker0501, if he really wants, to start a DR that will almost inevitably fail?
@Toniker0501: for what it's worth: speedy deletion should only be used for a clear-cut case, where there is no likelihood of a reasonable person disagreeing. This is clearly not such a case. - Jmabel ! talk 19:27, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring regarding map coloration continues after a recent protection expired. Editors are currently discussing the map coloration on the talk page, but people appear to be trying to edit war in their preferred version in the meantime. This should probably be restored to the file as it was prior to the start of the edit war, and I think that we probably need either full or template protection here so as to force editors to discuss rather than overwriting the file. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Protected for 2 days Bastique ☎ let's talk! 17:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Should I restore the pre-edit war version, Bastique? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, it looks like The Squirrel Conspiracy has done so already, and has taken action to prevent revert warring by applying revdel to the intermediate revision. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]