Commons:特色图片评选

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:特色图片候选)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:
Skip to current candidates 跳转至评选区
此处的图片评选区交流主要使用英语，如果需要中文交流区，请前往中文维基百科的本地评选区。

特色图片评选

欢迎来到特色图片评选！社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一，即特色图片，每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻，也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云：“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像，请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识，图像就会成功入选。

这里列出了特色图片的评选记录，你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片：2004年、2005年, 2006年、2007年、2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年、2013年、2014年、2015年、2016年、2017年、2018年、2019年、2020 以及本月。

关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述，请参阅我们的年度评选。

规范

[edit]
  • 投票周期为10天，之后的投票将无效。
  • 欢迎匿名用户提名并参与讨论。
  • 提名者可以随时撤回提名。
  • 每个注册用户都可以投票，匿名用户的票将不统计。
  • 如果提名5天后没有支持票，该提名将提前结束。
  • 通过的标准：至少5个支持票，支持票与反对票比例大于2/1。
  • 完成的投票保存在存档。
  • 参见投票结束后操作指引。

提名

[edit]

如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像，并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可，那么请按照如下步骤操作：

1. 按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg）在下方的文本框输入图像名称，然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。

如果本次提名为第n次提名，请按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg/2）展开操作。

所有的新图片集提名页面都应按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My nomination）进行。


2. 按照编辑页面上的说明进行操作并保存页面。（注：打开编辑页面后，您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意为“这里是候选图片列表，请将您的提名提交到本节的顶部（在本行后）”；您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意为“不要在本行上方添加新的贴士（除了顶部）”。 ）

3. 点击此处并按如下格式在图片候选区的顶端加入新内容：

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg}}

推荐操作：请COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。

可选操作：如果您不是图像的创建者，请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~”（不含括号）。

注意，你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当！

[edit]

光暗度

[edit]

在讨论图像的光暗度的时候，投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示，它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个（甚至四个）圈子，那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子，你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数，故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话，也可以考虑把它打印出来。

色彩度

[edit]

在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图，图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合，你则须要调校你的伽玛设置（在电脑的输出设置上，而不在于屏幕显示），直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难，然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意，在液晶显示（无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕）上观看图片，你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要，请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。

[edit]

File:Catedral, Segovia, España, 2024-06-14, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 17:23:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chapter house full of tapestries (work of Gerard Peemans, Flemish weaver, ca. 1625-1700) in the cathedral of Segovia, Spain.

File:Tour-Alty, a monument of architecture of the Altai Republic 02.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 16:57:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Shivaliks Snow Himalayas Aerial Jammu ed Jul24 A7CR 01943.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 16:11:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mountains of Jammu region of India, including snow-capped ranges of the Himalayas, as seen from a Jammu-Delhi flight

File:Hassan Tower 2.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 15:09:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An almost empty view of Hassan tower in Rabat Morocco. I think it could be featured due to this transfer of cultural Heriatge from mother to kids.

 I withdraw my nominationThank you everyone I will do better next time --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 20:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ферапонтов белозерский монастырь 1.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 12:52:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ferapontov Belozersky Monastery, Vologda, Russia

File:Close wing puddling of Libythea lepita Moore, 1858 - Common Beak WLB MG 3212.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 11:16:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close wing puddling of Libythea lepita Moore, 1858 - Common Beak WLB MG 3212.jpg

File:Open wing basking of Chersonesia risa (Doubleday, 1848) - Common Maplet WLB MG 4406.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 11:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Open wing basking of Chersonesia risa (Doubleday, 1848) - Common Maplet WLB MG 4406.jpg

File:Scanning electron micrograph of a human H9 T cell infected with HIV virus particles.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 09:41:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

human H9 T cell

File:Zaadpeulen van goudenregen (Laburnum anagyroides), 31-08-2024. (d.j.b).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 04:19:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seed pods of a Laburnum anagyroides

File:Traditional hanok houses at golden hour in Bukchon Hanok Village in Seoul.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 01:47:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Traditional hanok houses at golden hour in Bukchon Hanok Village in Seoul
  •  Weak support It's a very nice photo, but I'm not a big fan of blown highlights. If any RGB color reaches 255 on a largish area, it becomes noticeable. I'll try to create notes for the file in a moment, to mark the areas. --Tupungato (talk) 14:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks, Tupungato, for your vote. Your image notes are so small that they are very difficult to find on the image. But I finally got them. I don't think these are "blow highlights" (meaning with totally white parts, like burnt) in a standard sRGB environment. In any case, if there were, I could fix them. -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:46, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Myeongjeongjeon seen through the wooden Gate Hyehwamun at Changgyeonggung Palace in Seoul.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 01:36:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Myeongjeongjeon seen through the wooden Gate Hyehwamun at Changgyeonggung Palace in Seoul

File:Gans Family Mausoleum Dome, Frankfurt, Germany.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 00:31:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:074 Black-headed weaver gathering nest material at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2024 at 13:41:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black-headed weaver gathering nest material at Kibale forest National Park

File:28-2 Kalâa de Beni Hammad (2).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2024 at 13:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Qal'at Bani Hammad was a fortified palatine city in Algeria. Now in ruins, in the 11th century, it served as the first capital of the Hammadid dynasty.

File:Kasbah Amridil enterance, Marocco (قصبة امريديل).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 17:38:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kasbah Amridil enterance, Marocco (قصبة امريديل)

File:Blue-throated Barbet Sasatgre West Garo Oct24 A7CR 03684.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 13:50:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue-throated barbet, Meghalaya, India
LGTM,  Support --A.Savin 07:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monasterio de Curchi, Curchi, Moldavia, 2023-11-01, DD 105-107 HDR.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 12:57:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Curchi Monastery, Curchi, Moldova
[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 12:59:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stephen the Great Monument, Chișinău, Moldova
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 17:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lac Bersau (8).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 11:01:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lac Bersau in commune of Laruns, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France

File:Basilica dos Congregados (10).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 10:57:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Basílica dos Congregados in Braga, Braga District, Portugal

File:Black-crested Bulbul West Garo Meghalaya Oct24 A7CR 03835.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 03:14:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black-crested bulbul, Sasatgre, Meghalaya

File:Jadeite Cabbage, National Palace Museum.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2024 at 21:48:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jadeite Cabbage, National Palace Museum, Taiwan

File:Carved pumpkin - Ludwigsburg 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2024 at 20:48:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Hassan Tower, Rabat, Marocco (صومعة حسان ).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2024 at 16:29:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hassan Tower, Rabat, Marocco (صومعة حسان)

File:Qutb Minar with Neem Tree.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2024 at 03:20:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Qutb Minar, a victory tower inside the Qutb complex, Delhi.

File:Rom (IT), Brücke „Ponte Vittorio Emanuele II“ -- 2024 -- 0732.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2024 at 22:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ponte Vittorio Emanuele II (Bridge) in Rome, Italy at blue hour
There was indeed a (moderate) noise reduction on the water, which I removed in an updated version. It should be better now, shouldn't it? --A. Öztas 16:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure, but it may have been an effect of the brightening - the RAW file was very underexposed in that area. --A. Öztas 21:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Army Soldier's Book of Georgiy Pavlovich Osipov, 1946.pdf

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2024 at 19:24:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A seven-page high-resolution scan of a Красноармейская книжка (Red Army booklet, Rotarmistenbuch, Livret militaire de l'Armée rouge), a Red Army Soldier's ID issued to Georgiy Pavlovich Osipov on 13 May 1946.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
  •  Info This upload represents the first complete (7 pages), high-resolution (1200 dpi, 7,900 × 10,712 pixels) scan of a Red Army Soldier's ID (Красноармейская книжка) in public domain. Issued on 13 May 1946, this document offers a crucial window into the immediate post-WWII period. Unlike existing fragmented images, this seven-page scan meticulously captures every detail, including personal information, military service history, issued equipment, awards, and even subtle characteristics like handwriting and stamps. This comprehensive PDF document allows researchers to analyze not only the soldier's experience but also the document itself – the type of paper, ink, and printing methods used, providing valuable context. As physical copies become increasingly rare due to age and fragility, this high-quality digital preservation ensures long-term accessibility for historians, genealogists, and anyone interested in learning more about this pivotal period. I'm not certain which category to chose - Hope to receive you help on that. Created by David Osipov - uploaded by David Osipov - nominated by David Osipov -- David Osipov (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- David Osipov (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose There's a red link in the categories. (And an orange warning sign on the file page ?) The pages don't have all the same dimension. Some pages are awkwardly cropped out (last one for example). There's a problem at the bottom of page 3 with blurred content. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I might have been willing to vote for this given its historical significance... however, there's a problem with the format. The fact that this is a PDF means it fails in terms of scope (see the guidelines): "Scope – In addition to falling within the Commons scope, candidates must be static two-dimensional images. All other types of files should be nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates.".--Peulle (talk) 09:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andromeda Galaxy M31 - Heic1502a Full resolution.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2024 at 18:51:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Финляндский жд мост.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2024 at 16:10:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Architectural monument, railway bridge

File:Common buckeye (35663).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2024 at 14:57:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common buckeye

File:Apricot Mandarin duckling (22011).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2024 at 14:50:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close-up of an apricot Mandarin duckling

File:Space X booster Full Stack.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2024 at 13:49:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Refueling Starship Heavy

File:Shen Nicolo Bay - Sazan 2023.png

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2024 at 10:22:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

San Nicolò Bay, Sazan Island 2023.

File:Lechfall - Füssen 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2024 at 06:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lech falls, Füssen, Ostallgäu, Bavaria, Germany

File:2024-08-24 Motorsport, Formel 1, Großer Preis der Niederlande 2024 STP 3369 by Stepro.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2024 at 05:54:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2024 at 23:36:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Masai giraffe in the Serengeti National Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Giraffidae (Giraffes)

File:Djebel Ayachi, Eastern High Atlas, Morocco By Mounir NEDDI1.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2024 at 19:28:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • ✓ Done Here is an edited version which removes most CAs and also reduces the noise in the sky and the far (unsharp) background. It’s not easy to remove only the CAs because some of them have similar colours as the landscape; and it’s also not easy to get rid of the noise because the sky shows a subtle pattern (maybe from editing, maybe from the Canon sensor, I don’t know); but I hope my version is an improvement. @Cmao20: Would you say the edited version is a decent improvement? @Mounir Neddi: If you like the edited version, you can use it and you can (or I can) just upload over your version. Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 15:29, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giza Pyramids during "Forever is Now" exhibition.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2024 at 15:13:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Urbino - Duomo di Urbino - Visto da via Puccinotti (1) - 2024-09-23 16-14-34 001.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2024 at 13:02:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cathedral of Urbino, Marche, Italy.

Alternative imageː Cathedral of Urbino, facade.

[edit]

File:Jindřichov - autumn.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2024 at 12:35:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trees in Jindřichov, Czech Republic

File:The Conjurer, ca. 1502.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2024 at 10:22:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Follower of Hieronymus Bosch: The Conjurer

File:Dom (Deutzer Brücke).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2024 at 08:28:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Great St. Martin Church and Cologne Cathedral seen from the Deutz Bridge

File:Château Frontenac, Quebec city, Canada.jpg (delist)

[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2024 at 06:24:02
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Photomontage - Château Frontenac, Quebec city, Canada
  •  Info Fake image. Heavily altered photograph, making it look like a Disney dreamy castle. Look at this 🌘 purple sunset ✨️, is that not extraordinary? I think many people like me have been fooled by this nomination, as nothing indicated the manipulation here nor in the file page, before my misleading support.
This picture has been uploaded on Commons without any mention of the fake background, neither in the file name, nor in the description, nor in the categories, and has certainly been nominated by Ikan Kekek in good faith, at this stage.
But oddly, it is a colorful sunset associated to a photo taken at 14:06, early afternoon, according to exif metada, a few minutes before this picture with similar shadows, this skyline, the same castle, same day at 16:42, and from another angle at 16:29.
The day after my vote, a template has been added saying "Retouched picture - The image was taken with the combination of 3 images at different times of the day". Was a tripod used here? Here is the building just 16 minutes later (same light, and very likely overprocessed photo). And look at this other incredible pink sunset taken same day at 16:30 in the afternoon. Is it real? Does anything indicate "fake", "retouched", "photomontage" or else in the current version? Is the sky similar to this one, taken just one minute before? How many fakes are there like those?
And how far did the cheating go? Following this fake of unreal building by the same author, discovered this year just by chance, nominated for delisting by A.Savin and leading to distrust among many of us, Aristeas requested from Wilfredor "Please check your featured pictures one by one. Are there more of them which were created artificially or were manipulated heavily? If yes, then please list these photos (and only these) here and we can discuss how to proceed with them". Wilfredor answered with a few links showing very minor retouches and wrote "In some photos I removed some dirty dust in the sky, I removed some garbage, nothing that really alters the result in a drastic way." Why has this problematic FP been hidden in January 2024? We could have discussed the case earlier.
It is such an incredible view with vivid colors and extraordinary purple sky, it is no surprise that the image reached the 8th position among the thousand candidates at the Picture Of The Year (2020). But which position the real photo would have reached with no artificial sunset? And was the category appropriate? I don't think so. It is very obvious that if you add a rainbow, a full moon, a fantastic cloud, or anything spectacular in a picture, the wow factor is more likely to fascinate people, especially if your candidate is accepted at FPC. On the original nomination, Poco wrote "the result is great" but I have strong doubts the reviewing people really know which kind of picture exactly they had under the eyes. At least my own vote would have been an explicit {{Oppose}}, and perhaps other people would have discussed before taking another decision. -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep The sky is a bit purpleish ok, but the light on the buildings is beautiful. Photography is not only about realism. If the sky seems to be a bit "fantasy", it's not a problem to me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Info It is not "a bit purpleish", it is totally different from what it was in reality. See the other pictures taken at the same time. And here, I suspect a huge modification, not just a minor local change. Moreover, everything should have been crystal clear from the beginning on the file page and in the file name. This is not "a bit fantasy", in my opinion. It's just completely impossible, once you check everything carefully. Similar case. Also "a bit fantasy"? -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think the two are similar cases because in that image the added northern lights were a huge (if not main) component of the picture, whereas the sky in this image is not the main component, the autumn view of the castle is. And in this case the modification was not hidden, it was duly declared on the file page as well as the nomination page (albeit a bit late but it still received 10 +support votes even after the declaration). The main contention with this image is if the declared modification was indeed the real modification, or if the sky came from a completely different place. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I did have the impression this picture was an 'artistic' rather than realistic depiction at the time after reading Wilfredor's reply to Poco a Poco's comments, so I am not too troubled by it. However, it would have been nice if you'd been a bit more open about the manipulations made at the time, Wilfredor. Can you clarify for me how taking three exposures at different times of day produced this kind of effect? I'd like to know, partly out of interest as this technique is new to me. Cmao20 (talk) 11:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment +1. This is a very interesting case (to put it neutrally for now). Already during the nomination Daniel Case understood this photo as a “combination of different times of day” and called it “not so much a retouched image as a composite”. But we still do not know exactly if this is correct, or if maybe totally unrelated photos have been combined here. Therefore like Cmao20 I would be eager to learn how exactly this picture has been created. – Aristeas (talk) 14:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Hmm, i think i put S that time. Simple, Wilfredor can you upload original somewhere ? If "you havent" i must oppose. Colors are more pastel, if some vibrance added thats fine. Let see first. --Mile (talk) 18:33, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist I recall that these were three separate images: two long-exposure shots of the sky taken at different times to clear the clouds, and another of the castle with a shorter exposure to capture the trees clearly. Unfortunately, I no longer have the raw files or the Photoshop project used to merge the building with the sky. At that time, I didn't think it was necessary to explain the process, nor did I anticipate that such edits might be controversial. I now understand the importance of providing more details. I just got home from work, which is why it took me a while to respond, but I'm fully prepared to clarify any concerns you may have about this or any other image. BTW, In the future, ping me to know what people are talking about me, I always go through FPC but I could miss some discussion. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your vote, Wilfredor. The standard page for the delist process does not seem formatted to ping the photographers, contrary to a standard nomination page. There is just a transcluded code supposing to link to the original nomination. According to the light, it looks like the sky has been cut and pasted around the castle. -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral leaning towards keep; the modification was declared at the time of nomination and did not receive any opposition then, but as Aristeas has pointed out, we don't know if the modification was limited to what was declared only. It comes down to whether or not Wilfredor is telling the truth above, and for the time being I'm choosing to assume good faith and believe them, until someone gives me enough reason not to. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info 1) First, some modifications have been mentioned during the voting process, after 12 positive votes, not from the beginning as it should have been. Nothing was indicated at the start, and many of us may have missed this part. Thus, the start could have been totally different, and have given another orientation to the debate. As everybody know, it's always more difficult to invert a tendency where there is already a clear consensus. 2) Secondly, even if some reviewers noticed the modification, it is very improbable they were aware of what exactly / how far the photomontage was (because no way to compare). Taking 3 pictures at 18:00, 18:05 and 18:10 is totally different than taking three pictures at 14:00, 17:00 and 19:00. And does the sunset sky even come from the same day?? 3) As long as we don't have the original photos / real pictures under the eyes, it seems extremely difficult for us to figure out what would be the real sky. The closest we can imagine is this sky with burnt clouds apparently taken 2 hours later. The light of the building is different, but the sky may have been similar. 4) It is supposed to be a realistic image, giving faithful representation of the place, under realistic weather conditions. At least the picture competed in such category, and not in Composites and Montages (like this transparent creation for example). The discussion should have been oriented around this dreamy aspect, instead of taking us by surprise, or even misleading us. There are weird elements in the purple sky of this picture taken same day, inside the bell tower -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment According to the picture (check the road markings) and to google street view it looks like the picture was taken from the middle of the road. To achieve a true combination of 3 separate photos with different lightings the camera would need to be on a tripod (so that all pictures are taken from the exact same place with exact same framing to avoid inconsistencies when assembling) but the tripod would need to stay on the middle of the road and of the driving cars for an extended period which seems difficult/impossible. Also, this picture seems downsized to 2858x2960 pixels (this other photo from the same camera and place has 4 times more resolution : 5929x5304 pixels). The fact that the picture was downsized makes it difficult to zoom in to search for inconsistencies. Could you please upload the full resolution picture Wilfredor and also enlighten us on how you made to keep a tripod on the middle of the road for an extended period? Thank you in advance -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Also, maybe it's just a wrong impression of mine but when looking at the picture at thumbnail size it looks like to me that the sky is brighter all around the castle as if some editing happened there (but maybe it's just an exposure brush). Is it me or was that area edited? Thank you in advance -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There is a small island where a tripod can be placed in the middle of the street. The street was lightly trafficked by vehicles and, in fact, there were very few people. Unfortunately, I do not have the RAW files of this photograph, as four years ago I did not give sufficient importance to backing up these files. However, in recent months I have started to do so, as this facilitates the verification and execution of future retouching. Wilfredor (talk) 02:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I saw the small island on street view but when you look at the markings on the road we can see that you were on the middle of the crosswalk and not on the small island. The point of view from the small island would be to have the sidewalk from the left of your picture in front of you and not the road. Also if you would have been on the small island this tree would cover even more the building (look at the tree on the left) as it does from this streeview perspective closer to the island but not yet on it which is not the case in this photo (look at the tree on the left) and indicates that you were not on the small island.
    Even if you don't have the original raw, maybe you have the jpg of the 3 unedited shots that you used to assemble? Or if that's all you have can you show us the three edited shots that you assembled so that we can better understand the editing process? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+1 with Giles about the impression of brightness around the castle, at thumbnail size, as if the sun(set) was behind. Whereas the sun is supposed to be on the left, according to the shadows. Does this sky come from a totally different picture? Also agree that the drastically downsized resolution makes the search for inconsistencies more difficult. Thanks for your help. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Nikon D7200 has a maximum image resolution of 6000 x 4000 pixels. The image you are trying to compare has a resolution of 5929 x 5304 pixels, which exceeds the capability that this camera can generate on its own. This leads me to believe that it is a composite photo made from several images. I do not recall having downsized it; perhaps I cut . Additionally, there are details that are really difficult to remember, as this photo was taken four years ago and I typically capture thousands of images each year. Remembering a specific detail is not easy, but it is evident that such a resolution is not possible with the Nikon D7200 without combining multiple images Wilfredor (talk) 02:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Both this picture and this picture have been taken from the same distance of the castle. And this picture was even shot at 32mm which is a bigger zoom than the 26 mm used on this picture (so the 32mm picture should have building windows appearing bigger than in the 26mm shot). When you zoom in on both pictures at full size you can clearly see that the one on the left was downsized because everything is way smaller (compare the windows for example) when in reality the windows should have been bigger on the left than on the right because a bigger zoom was used on the image on the left. Even if this picture is a panorama, stitching images together to create a panorama won't give more resolution to each window on the building. Also this picture is much sharper than the other one, which is something that always happens when a picture is downsized. So it looks like to me that this picture is very likely downsized -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist , I guess, per creator's wishes, but I still don't really understand how this picture was made or to what extent it is manipulated/artificial. Giles Laurent's questions make me even more confused. If this picture had been presented as an artistic photomontage in the first place I'd still have voted for it, btw. But I'm not sure I can trust it anymore. Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The skies were combined into multiple layers using Photoshop, adjusting the transparency percentage of each to achieve a harmonious fusion. Subsequently, this composition was integrated with the photograph of the castle and the clouds. I mention this not with the intention of changing your opinion, but simply to provide a detailed explanation. I think that if you look for things there will always be theories of what could have been, what was not and supposedly incongruous things, and as Mile said, in the absence of a RAW that proves it, my word will not convince, so I suggest making a list of this and any image of mine that does not have a supporting RAW. I myself am not voluntarily nominating any more Featured Pictures. I sincerely feel that this process is demeaning. Wilfredor (talk) 02:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the sun is setting on the left, should not the sky be brighter on the left too, like in this picture? -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist If the picture had been classified as a photomontage from the beginning, and all the steps had been clearly documented, this de-listing would never have happened. The documentation would have also included the images from which the composite was created. I am sorry Wilfredor, but the undisclosed manipulations discovered by other users have damaged your good reputation. In my opinion, you are an outstanding photographer who does not need to gain kudos with undocumented manipulations. We have to be honest with each other in this forum, anything else leads to additional poisoning, of which we have already had far too much here. Honesty is the best policy. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 07:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I know. My "+1" relates to Radomianin's comment. I am confused what to vote. This is a nice picture, but the undisclosed manipulations bring bad feelings. Yann (talk) 16:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist Now i read about "Caracas building", i was mislead there too. Now, how to trust your future nomines, without original...--Mile (talk) 07:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist Best solution. --Thi (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist as viewers were deceived in FPC and POTY. It ran out of control, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reluctant  Delist not because it shouldn't be a FP -- I think it should -- but because process is important. Just be as clear as you can with the {{Retouched}} template so as not to leave any lingering questions and nominate with that in place. If you forget to do so, it's important to ping everything who supported up to that point. IMO this should still be a FP, but it should undergo a new nomination once full information is provided on the file page. — Rhododendrites talk |  16:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thanks, everyone, for the reviews and various opinions. For the record, the Caracas building has been renominated last January, but didn't pass. About composite and montage pictures in general (not especially this one), perhaps we can suggest to 1) carefully choose the relevant galleries, 2) be in possession of the original photos (at least the JPG versions) so as to be able to talk transparently about the presented works, 3) maintain a standard resolution (no downsized pictures for example) in line with the present time, displaying enough pixels so as to compete with the very best images of the same kind. Now my personal opinion about this castle with colorful trees is that the original photo should have been able to be promoted with no major modification (because we can see the light is special somewhere). But perhaps the clouds were burnt with blown highlights at the beginning, something impossible to fix afterwards. In that case that would have been a technical issue (all photographers ever met this situation). But we learn from past errors, and we can improve by practicing. -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist . Commons deserves better --A.Savin 17:48, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jews Protest in Solidarity with Palestine -1 (52082106404).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2024 at 04:30:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Ali Mujtaba WLM2015 FAISAL MOSQUE m 10.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2024 at 03:52:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Faisal Mosque in the capital city of Pakistan, in 2014
This is a photo of a monument in Pakistan identified as the
ICT-5

Alternative evening view

[edit]

Faisal Mosque with the majestic Margalla Hills in the backdrop

File:Амбуланта во Чаниште.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2024 at 22:58:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The entrance of the former medical facility in the village of Čanište

File:Aromia moschata on Heracleum sphondylium 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2024 at 14:41:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aromia moschata on Heracleum sphondylium
Good pick :-) Thanks for your research and comment. Here another one from 2018 also with more pixels, while smaller in size (the body is only 12mm length). Same light and same iridescent aspect. Sure the equipment is important, and it looks like this picture was taken with a Panasonic compact camera DC-TZ200. However, the sensor resolution is supposed to be 5492 x 3661 pixels, far more than the current nomination. So perhaps this picture has been downsized or cropped? Of course better equipment tends to give better photos, nevertheless it happens that very good shots from compact cameras, and even mobile phone's, get promoted here. Nice to hear you've visited Laos, and good luck for your photographing work in the future! -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:20, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Basile Morinǃ The picture is downsized and cropped. Also, I have used the automatic focus stacking function of the camera, without being very familiar with it. I uploaded File:Aromia moschata on Heracleum sphondylium 01b.jpg (3,504 × 2,336 pixels) today, without any manipulation I am aware of, for comparison with the nominated picture. I have also uploaded a "02b" - the quality is more or less the same, malheureusement. - It was interesting to hear that it has actually happened, that shots from compact cameras and even mobile phone's have been promoted, I was hesitant about this. If possible and it you ever have time, it would be interesting to see some samplesǃ Best regards Simiha (talk) 13:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This FP, for example, was taken with a compact camera -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait a man sitting calmly by the side of a road in Shambhunath Municipality, Nepal-4556.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2024 at 16:45:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait a man sitting calmly by the side of a road in Shambhunath Municipality, Nepal
  • Why? I don't see why it's unsafe, it's not like it's a motorway or he's in the middle of the road. People walk along roadside verges all the time in my country, idk if it's different where you live. Cmao20 (talk) 20:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Support I was carefully checking the place, I saw that there is no google street map there, so I looked for videos of the roads. From what I see, people walk and move freely without any apparent traffic rules, so I will assume that it is a peculiarity of the place, I will change my vote in favor. Wilfredor (talk) 00:06, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
*Per Commons:Talk page guidelines#Communication good practice, the custom is rather to cross out the vote with <s> and </s> instead of modifying it on the fly, which makes the current vote in total inadequacy with the above comment, as it stands, in addition to altering the history -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing Basking of Papilio crino (Fabricius, 1793) - Common Banded Peacock WLB.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2024 at 15:26:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
COM:FPC "The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator." Cmao20 is right. About the allegation of "fake background", see this recent and promoted case. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2024 at 22:04:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Solar System Diagram
  • For categorization, see COM:CAT. For language, the problem is in the file page. You write "English" for descriptions not in English. Idem caption. Of course, an additional description and caption in English would be a nice addition. But first, fix the current one, please. Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:22, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sorry but while this is a useful diagram, the standard for diagrams at FP should be SVG, not JPEG. I'm also not convinced by the way Saturn's rings are depicted. Cmao20 (talk) 12:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Because the images taken of planets and moons are in the raster format and converting it to SVG will have no benefit, as you couldn't scale up a raster image. Making a diagram of these planets in SVG might be possible, but it would have an insanely big filesize and would not be able to capture these bodies realistically. WhatisMars (talk) 15:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Doing this in SVG allows for easier editing, simpler translation, etc. Wilfredor (talk) 16:58, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I agree that normally SVG should be used for diagrams due to its many advantages (vector graphics are far superior in many respects), but in this case I understand that it’s reasonable to want to use raster images for the planets and moons; we could embed them one by one into a SVG, but the result would be a rather complicated SVG file. So it’s certainly easier to go with a single big raster image in this case, and I must admit that this one is well done, clear and more elegant than most other solar system diagrams I have seen. – Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    SVG supports embedding bitmap images. In this case, that would be my recommendation instead of creating a vectorized (raster) image of the planets. My request to transform this into SVG is primarily to make it easier to translate and edit if there is something to add, correct, or to create derivative images with more or less information. Wilfredor (talk) 00:29, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, it makes sense now. I'm reading this section in Help:SVG#Bitmaps and it is fascinating that you can embed bitmap pictures to SVG. I never know about this before, plus it also helps with adding names of planets for a lot of languages. The only minor thing that I don't like is the limited font selection but that should be the least of my concerns haha. WhatisMars (talk) 16:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Abstain Without speaking Vietnamese, I'm unable to check the content, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment That’s indeed a good general question. Can I vote pro/contra a diagram like this one when I cannot check the texts thoroughly? The diagram is very similar to this one with English captions (they are OK, AFAIK). The names of the moons ar the same in both languages and are OK, too (unlike the English version the Vietnamese one spells Callisto correctly). In addition I have checked some of the Vietnamese captions and the Vietnamese description of the file with internet translation services and the texts seem completely sound. But such translation services are, as I know from several tests, not 100% reliable, so this is not absolutely certain; that’s a problem. On the other hand, it’s also kind of a problem when diagrams in languages which are not spoken by many FPC regulars do not get votes just because we do not have enough people familiar with the language; that could be seen as – completely unintentional! – discrimination. For now I keep my support vote, as I see no reason to mistrust the nominator’s reliability, but I would be happy if we would get some additional input from people who speak Vietnamese. – Aristeas (talk) 10:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment Ah, maybe there are some little errors (or things I don’t understand): AFAICS moons are listed in increasing radius from bottom to top, but the list for Saturn omits Iapetus which according to the English Wikipedia should be listed between Rhea and Dione. And the order of moons of the Jupiter is different from the order in the English article; according to diameter or mass, I would expect Ganymede, Callisto, Io, Europa. IMHO it would also be easier to understand if the moons would be listed in increasing radius from top to bottom, i.e. in the opposite order. WhatisMars, could you please check this? – Aristeas (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, Iapetus is definitely missing. I think the order is fine because it's in order of orbits from closest to furthest from the planet. But Proteus is also missing for Neptune, and seeing it's larger than Mimas which you did include, it should be there. All this would be easier to fix if we had an SVG version of course... Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is an error on my part. I would like to withdraw the nomination and I will create an SVG-raster version of the image to encourage easy translation. WhatisMars (talk) 16:41, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to make a new SVG-raster image and based on en:List of natural satellites, I will only list moons that has a diameter of >100 km for planets and list all moons for dwarf planets. WhatisMars (talk) 17:02, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:特色图片评选&oldid=396544468"