Cryptography and Network Security Chapter 20
Fifth Edition by William Stallings Lecture slides by Lawrie Brown
Intruders
significant
issue for networked systems is hostile or unwanted access either via network or local can identify classes of intruders:
Masquerader-An unauthorized user who penetrates a computer systems access control and gains acccess to user accounts Masquerader
Intruders
Misfeasor-A legitimate user who accesses resources he is not authorized to access, or someone who is authorized such access but misuses his privileges. Clandestine user- A user who seizes the supervisory control of the system and uses it to evade auditing and access control
varying
levels of competence
Intruders
range
benign: explore, still costs resources serious: access/modify data, disrupt system
intruder
techniques & behavior patterns constantly shifting, have common features
Examples of Intrusion
remote root compromise web server defacement guessing / cracking passwords copying viewing sensitive data / databases running a packet sniffer distributing pirated software using an unsecured modem to access net impersonating a user to reset password using an unattended workstation
Hackers
motivated by thrill of access and status benign intruders might be tolerable
do consume resources and may slow performance cant know in advance whether benign or malign
Hacker Behavior Example
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
select target using IP lookup tools map network for accessible services identify potentially vulnerable services brute force (guess) passwords install remote administration tool wait for admin to log on and capture password use password to access remainder of network
Criminal Enterprise
organized
groups of hackers now a threat
corporation / government / loosely affiliated gangs typically young often Eastern European or Russian hackers often target credit cards on e-commerce server
criminal
hackers usually have specific targets once penetrated act quickly and get out sensitive data needs strong protection
Criminal Enterprise Behavior
1. 2. 3. 4.
5.
6.
act quickly and precisely to make their activities harder to detect exploit perimeter via vulnerable ports use trojan horses (hidden software) to leave back doors for re-entry use sniffers to capture passwords do not stick around until noticed make few or no mistakes.
Insider Attacks
among most difficult to detect and prevent employees have access & systems knowledge may be motivated by revenge / entitlement
when employment terminated taking customer data when move to competitor least privilege, monitor logs, strong authentication, termination process to block access & mirror data
IDS / IPS may help but also need:
Insider Behavior Example
1. 2.
3.
4. 5. 6. 7.
create network accounts for themselves and their friends access accounts and applications they wouldn't normally use for their daily jobs e-mail former and prospective employers conduct furtive instant-messaging chats visit web sites that cater to disgruntled employees, such as f'[Link] perform large downloads and file copying access the network during off hours.
Intrusion Techniques
aim
to gain access and/or increase privileges on a system often use system / software vulnerabilities key goal often is to acquire passwords
so then exercise access rights of owner
basic
attack methodology
target acquisition and information gathering initial access privilege escalation covering tracks
Password Guessing
one of the most common attacks attacker knows a login (from email/web page etc) then attempts to guess password for it
defaults, short passwords, common word searches user info (variations on names, birthday, phone, common words/interests) exhaustively searching all possible passwords
check by login or against stolen password file success depends on password chosen by user surveys show many users choose poorly
Password Capture
another attack involves password capture
watching over shoulder as password is entered using a trojan horse program to collect monitoring an insecure network login
eg. telnet, FTP, web, email
extracting recorded info after successful login (web history/cache, last number dialed etc)
using valid login/password can impersonate user users need to be educated to use suitable precautions/countermeasures
Intrusion Detection
inevitably
will have security failures so need also to detect intrusions so can
block if detected quickly act as deterrent collect info to improve security
assume
intruder will behave differently to a legitimate user
but will have imperfect distinction between
Intrusion Detection
Approaches to Intrusion Detection
statistical
anomaly detection
attempts to define normal/expected behavior threshold profile based
rule-based
detection
attempts to define proper behavior anomaly penetration identification
Audit Records
fundamental
tool for intrusion detection native audit records
part of all common multi-user O/S already present for use may not have info wanted in desired form
detection-specific
audit records
created specifically to collect wanted info at cost of additional overhead on system
Statistical Anomaly Detection
threshold
detection
count occurrences of specific event over time if exceed reasonable value assume intrusion alone is a crude & ineffective detector
profile
based
characterize past behavior of users detect significant deviations from this profile usually multi-parameter
Audit Record Analysis
foundation
of statistical approaches analyze records to get metrics over time
counter, gauge, interval timer, resource use
use
various tests on these to determine if current behavior is acceptable
mean & standard deviation, multivariate, markov process, time series, operational
key
advantage is no prior knowledge used
Rule-Based Intrusion Detection
observe
events on system & apply rules to decide if activity is suspicious or not rule-based anomaly detection
analyze historical audit records to identify usage patterns & auto-generate rules for them then observe current behavior & match against rules to see if conforms like statistical anomaly detection does not require prior knowledge of security flaws
Rule-Based Intrusion Detection
rule-based
penetration identification
uses expert systems technology with rules identifying known penetration, weakness patterns, or suspicious behavior compare audit records or states against rules rules usually machine & O/S specific rules are generated by experts who interview & codify knowledge of security admins quality depends on how well this is done
Base-Rate Fallacy
practically
an intrusion detection system needs to detect a substantial percentage of intrusions with few false alarms
if too few intrusions detected -> false security if too many false alarms -> ignore / waste time
this
is very hard to do existing systems seem not to have a good record
Distributed Intrusion Detection
traditional
focus is on single systems but typically have networked systems more effective defense has these working together to detect intrusions issues
dealing with varying audit record formats integrity & confidentiality of networked data centralized or decentralized architecture
Distributed Intrusion Detection Architecture
Distributed Intrusion Detection Agent Implementation
Honeypots
decoy
systems to lure attackers
away from accessing critical systems to collect information of their activities to encourage attacker to stay on system so administrator can respond
are
filled with fabricated information instrumented to collect detailed information on attackers activities single or multiple networked systems cf IETF Intrusion Detection WG standards
Password Management
front-line
defense against intruders users supply both:
login determines privileges of that user password to identify them
passwords
often stored encrypted
Unix uses multiple DES (variant with salt) more recent systems use crypto hash function
should
protect password file on system
Password Studies
Purdue
1992 - many short passwords Klein 1990 - many guessable passwords conclusion is that users choose poor passwords too often need some approach to counter this
Managing Passwords Education
can
use policies and good user education educate on importance of good passwords give guidelines for good passwords
minimum length (>6) require a mix of upper & lower case letters, numbers, punctuation not dictionary words
but
likely to be ignored by many users
Managing Passwords Computer Generated
let
computer create passwords if random likely not memorisable, so will be written down (sticky label syndrome) even pronounceable not remembered have history of poor user acceptance FIPS PUB 181 one of best generators
has both description & sample code generates words from concatenating random pronounceable syllables
Managing Passwords Reactive Checking
reactively
run password guessing tools
note that good dictionaries exist for almost any language/interest group
cracked
passwords are disabled but is resource intensive bad passwords are vulnerable till found
Managing Passwords Proactive Checking
most
promising approach to improving password security allow users to select own password but have system verify it is acceptable
simple rule enforcement (see earlier slide) compare against dictionary of bad passwords use algorithmic (markov model or bloom filter) to detect poor choices
Summary
have
considered:
problem of intrusion, behavior and techniques intrusion detection (statistical & rule-based) password management