0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views16 pages

RFP

This proposal outlines a plan to migrate 5 websites from a Century Link data center to Microsoft Azure cloud over 3 weeks. Key aspects of the proposal include conducting an analysis of the existing system architecture and costs, setting up the Azure environment, performing code changes and testing for migration, migrating production data and virtual machines to Azure, and providing post-migration warranty and ongoing support. The proposal estimates 30% lower monthly costs on Azure and 25% yearly savings. It also outlines pricing, timelines, risks, and administrative details for the engagement.

Uploaded by

Sourav Biswas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views16 pages

RFP

This proposal outlines a plan to migrate 5 websites from a Century Link data center to Microsoft Azure cloud over 3 weeks. Key aspects of the proposal include conducting an analysis of the existing system architecture and costs, setting up the Azure environment, performing code changes and testing for migration, migrating production data and virtual machines to Azure, and providing post-migration warranty and ongoing support. The proposal estimates 30% lower monthly costs on Azure and 25% yearly savings. It also outlines pricing, timelines, risks, and administrative details for the engagement.

Uploaded by

Sourav Biswas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Introduction: Provides the background and objectives for migrating five websites to Azure cloud, highlighting prior experience.
  • Understanding of the Problem: Describes the existing system landscape and necessary support set-up for migration.
  • Assumptions: Lists assumed conditions for system architecture, access, and migration readiness.
  • In Scope: Defines the scope of services, including re-hosting and support after migration.
  • Out of Scope: Clarifies what the migration will not cover, such as code modifications unrelated to Azure migration.
  • Our Approach – Solution Architecture: Presents the proposed solution architecture, utilizing Azure CDN and other related tools.
  • Future Roadmap: Outlines future enhancements and performance improvements post-migration.
  • Anticipated Risk: Identifies potential risks and challenges that could affect the migration timeline.
  • Financial Proposal: Provides financial estimates for cloud migration, detailing cost reductions and spending forecasts.
  • Timelines: Displays the timeline for migration activities from start to finish.
  • Pricing: Details the resource allocation and cost structure for the project including rates and licensing fees.
  • Administrative Details: Covers proposal validity, billing terms, and legal obligations for the project.
  • Executive Summary: Summarizes key points of the migration project, including objectives, savings, and outcomes.
  • Conclusion: Thanks the reader for considering the proposal and includes corporate logos.

PROPOSAL FOR MIGRATING A Sourav Biswas PGPM-18-060

SET OF WEBSITES TO MS Sutirtha Choudhury PGPM-18-067


Vishwajeet Sinha PGPM-18-072
Sajid Ali PGPM-18-126
AZURE Shubhayan Roy PGPM-18-131
Sourav Basak PGPM-18-133
GROUP 9
CONTENT
Introduction
Our understanding of the Problem
Assumption and Scope
Solution Approach
Anticipated Risk
Financial Proposal
Timelines
Pricing
Risk
Executive summary
INTRODUCTION
 TWC is planning to migrate 5 websites to Azure cloud.
They sought for a proposal outlining the roadmap of migration.
XYZ Infosystems has conducted similar migrations for top
Fortune 500 clients across domains.
XYZ Infosystems would like to partner with TWC during this
migration process.
The proposal document contains the tentative plan for migration
along with pricing details.
The document also highlights the key assumptions and probable
risks identified.
UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROBLEM
• Migration 5 websites from Century Link Data Center to Azure
• 16x5 support + on-call support during non support hours
• Leverage the existing ticketing tool for IT service management
• Existing system Landscape -
Components Details
SERVER 4 Apache Webservers (2 Prod, 1 Stage,
(Linux) DR)
4 MySQL Database servers (2 Prod, 1
Stage, DR)
Forward Proxy Varnish
Application/Framework PHP (Drupal Content Management
Framework)
Administration tool Drush
Versioning tool Git
Other tools Memcached (cache), Google Search
ASSUMPTIONS
 Existing system architecture document, functional document are
available.
Proper access to existing application across all platform as well as
ITSM tool will be provided upon request.
 Knowledge transfer session to be provide to our associates to
understand the existing system better.
 TWC to provide a reliable hi-speed internet connection for the
migration activity
 Contract with TWC and Century Link datacentre permits the
migration activity
 The licences for the Racemi migration tool to be provided by TWC.
IN SCOPE
 Re-Hosting and re-platforming the existing system landscape
 Providing Warranty support of 2 weeks post migration
 Providing dedicated 16x5 support(L1, L2, L3) post Warranty
support.
 Providing 24x7 on-call support for any exigency
 Debugging and fixing of issues arising due to the migration
activities.
 Configuring any upstream system if required.
 End-to-end documentation to be provided for the migration
activity
OUT OF SCOPE
 Any modification to the system code which is not related to Azure
migration
 Refactoring of existing architecture for performance improvement
 Any application software upgrade/update activity such as updating
Drupal 7 to Drupal 8, PHP 5 to PHP 7 etc.
 Any bandwidth intensive optimisation and performance improvement
work to be done on the system
 Debugging and fixing of existing application issues and functionality
 Performing performance testing, acceptance testing etc.
 Configuring any downstream system which consumes data from TWC
servers.
OUR APPROACH – SOLUTION
ARCHITECTURE
FUTURE ROADMAP
 Performance improvement initiatives by adding the app
servers as a part of autoscaling groups.
Eliminate the need for maintaining a DR instance along with
database with help of automated snapshots.
 Capacity planning to ensure high efficiency across the system
 Reduction of 15% FTE Y-o-Y after the project has reached steady
state.
ANTICIPATED RISK
 Any ad-hoc change in requirement may result in delay in the
timeline and rework.
 Change in specification of 3rd party tools and Azure public cloud
 Delay in getting approvals from TWC stakeholders
 Quality and compatibility issue at on-prem and public cloud
instance.
 Dependency on uninterrupted connectivity and speed of the
internet connection
 Mutually agreed cutover downtime to change DNS from on-
prem to cloud servers
Unfulfilled financial commitment at respective milestones.
FINANCIAL PROPOSAL
 30% reduction on monthly cost and 25% savings on Y-o-Y spending.
 Provision to scale up in the future with minimum investment.
 8 member offshore (16 x 5) application support team post-migration.
On CenturyLink Datacentre Quantity Price($) Monthly Cost ($) On Azure Cloud Quantity Price($) Monthly Cost ($)
Elecricity - Compute (per kWh) 8 0.1 288 Compute node 4 0.05 144
Elecricity - Cooling (per kWH) 4 0.1 518.4 MySql Server 4 0.175 504
DBA 2 100 35200 Storage (GB) 5000 0.1 500
Network Administrator 2 80 28160 Redis Cache (1GB Standard) 4 0.138 397.44
Total 64166.4 Azure Serach (Basic) 4 0.1 288
Load Balancer (per 1M requests) 50 0.54 27
Support analyst (Offshore) 8 30 42240
Total 44100.44
TIMELINES
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5
Activities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Review Security
Pre Migation Analysie system architecture
Compare Costs
Cloud Environment Setup
Development Cofigure tools
Migration code changes
Functionality Testing
QA
Performance Testing
Production Data/VMs migarion
Migration
Cutover - Go/No-Go
Post Migration Warranty Support
PRICING
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5
Resource 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Cloud architect (on shore) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Developer 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Tester 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Offshore Lead 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Resource FTE Rate(per hour) Days Total
Cloud architect (on shore) 1 100 20 16000
Developer 2 30 25 12000
Tester 2 30 10 4800
Offshore Lead 1 50 25 10000
Sub-Total (USD) 42800
License Fee Quantity Rate
Racemi 4 299 1196
Total (USD) 43996
ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS
The proposal is valid till 7th August, 2019.
 Customer will be billed bi-weekly and the payment must be paid
before 14 days on receiving the invoice.
Local taxes to be added to the invoice.
Payment must be done through demand draft, or bank
transfer only.
All disputes to be subject to jurisdiction courts at Mumbai.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
 Azure migration will take 3 weeks, post which warranty support
and dedicated support will take over
 30% reduction on monthly cost and 25% savings on Y-o-Y
spending.
 Provision to scale up in the future with minimum investment.
 Mutually agreed cutover downtime to change DNS from on-prem
to cloud servers
 End-to-end documentation to be provided for the migration
activity
THANK YOU GROUP 9

You might also like