ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD

(Secondary Teacher Education Department)

WARNING
1. PLAGIARISM OR HIRING OF GHOST WRITER(S) FOR SOLVING THE ASSIGNMENT(S)
WILL DEBAR THE STUDENT FROM AWARD OF DEGREE/CERTIFICATE, IF FOUND AT
ANY STAGE.
2. SUBMITTING ASSIGNMENT(S) BORROWED OR STOLEN FROM OTHER(S) AS ONE’S
OWN WILL BE PENALIZED AS DEFINED IN “AIOU PLAGIARISM POLICY”.

Course: Secondary Education (8624) Semester: Spring,

2025
Level: [Link] 1.5 / BED 4 year

Total Marks: 100 Pass Marks:

50
ASSIGNMENT No. 2
(Units 5-9)

Q1. How Evaluation is important for improving the quality of an

education system. Give suggestions to improve the existing
system of the Board of Intermediate and Secondary
Education in Pakistan.
(20)

The Importance of Evaluation in Improving Education Quality and

Suggestions for Enhancing Pakistan’s Board System

Evaluation serves as the backbone of any effective education

system, providing critical feedback loops that identify
strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement.
In Pakistan’s context, where educational outcomes often fall
below international benchmarks, robust evaluation
 mechanisms could transform the Boards of Intermediate
and Secondary Education (BISEs). Proper evaluation does
more than measure performance - it reveals curriculum gaps,
teaching deficiencies, resource allocation problems, and
systemic inefficiencies. When implemented
comprehensively, evaluation data enables evidence-based
policymaking, targeted teacher training, and curriculum
reforms that directly address identified shortcomings. It
creates accountability at all levels, from students to
administrators, while providing transparent metrics for
stakeholders including parents, policymakers, and funding
bodies.

The current evaluation system under Pakistani boards suffers

from multiple deficiencies that undermine its effectiveness.
Examination-centric assessment promotes rote
memorization over conceptual understanding, with tests
often focusing on predictable, recycled questions. Evaluation
criteria remain inconsistent across different boards and
examination centers, compromising fairness and reliability.
The system lacks mechanisms to assess higher-order
thinking skills, practical competencies, or real-world
application of knowledge. Teacher evaluation components
are weak or nonexistent, missing opportunities to improve
instruction quality. Delayed result declarations and opaque
marking procedures erode public trust in the system.
Perhaps most critically, evaluation data rarely feeds back
into meaningful system improvements, representing a
wasted diagnostic opportunity.
To transform this system, Pakistan’s boards should implement
multifaceted reforms beginning with examination content
and methodology. Tests must shift from fact-recall to
competency-based assessments that measure analysis,
critical thinking, and problem-solving. This requires
developing new question formats - case studies, scenario-
based items, and applied projects - that evaluate deeper
understanding. Standardizing assessment criteria across all
boards through centralized training of paper setters and
examiners would ensure consistency and fairness.
Incorporating school-based assessments with proper
moderation controls can balance high-stakes exams with
continuous evaluation.

Modernizing evaluation infrastructure represents another crucial

improvement area. Digitizing examinations through
computer-based testing (phased implementation) would
reduce paper leaks, speed up grading, and enable innovative
question types. Online moderation systems using scanned
answer scripts could minimize human errors and biases in
marking. Centralized data analytics of results should identify
systemic weaknesses - for example, if certain districts
consistently underperform in mathematics, this signals
needed curriculum or teacher training interventions.

Teacher evaluation must become an integral component,

assessing both student outcomes and classroom practices
 through multiple measures: peer reviews, student feedback,
and teaching portfolios. Linking teacher professional
development to identified evaluation gaps would create
meaningful improvement cycles. Similarly, institutional
evaluations should assess school infrastructure, resources,
and leadership quality alongside academic results.

Transparency reforms could restore public confidence in the

system. Clear rubrics and sample answers should be
published for major examinations. A robust appeals process
with script rechecking options needs implementation. Timely
result declarations must become mandatory through
process automation and adequate staffing.

Long-term reforms should introduce comprehensive learning

assessments at key stages (Grade 5, 8, and 10) to monitor
foundational competencies. These diagnostic evaluations
would inform early interventions rather than waiting for
secondary-level failures. Pakistan should participate in
international assessments like PISA to benchmark against
global standards, using findings to drive curricular reforms.

The boards require significant capacity building to implement

these changes. Examiner training programs must emphasize
modern assessment techniques and bias reduction.
Investment in technology infrastructure is essential for
computer-based testing and data analytics. Research wings
 should be established within each board to analyze
evaluation data and recommend evidence-based
improvements.

Accountability mechanisms must accompany these changes.

Independent audits of board operations and examination
processes would ensure integrity. Clear consequences for
underperformance - whether for examination staff, teachers,
or schools - should be established and enforced.
Simultaneously, high performers deserve recognition and
rewards to incentivize excellence.

Community engagement represents another untapped

opportunity. Parents and local stakeholders should receive
accessible reports interpreting evaluation outcomes and
suggesting how they can support improvement. School
ranking systems based on multidimensional metrics (not
just exam results) could inform parental choice while driving
healthy competition.

Implementation should occur in phased phases, beginning with

pilot programs in selected districts. For example, a
competency-based assessment model could be tested in 20
schools before scaling. Technology upgrades might start
with urban centers before expanding. This gradual approach
allows for troubleshooting and adjustment.
Ultimately, transforming evaluation systems requires sustained
political will and adequate funding. Pakistan must view
evaluation not as an endpoint, but as the starting point for
continuous educational improvement. By making
assessments more valid, reliable, and actionable, the boards
can drive positive change throughout the education
ecosystem - from classroom teaching practices to national
policy formulation. The human and financial resources
required for this overhaul represent a necessary investment
in Pakistan’s future workforce and national development.
With proper implementation, a reformed evaluation system
could become the catalyst that elevates Pakistan’s
education quality to meet 21st century demands.
Q. 2 Compare the Education systems of Asian and European
Countries at the secondary level.

Comparison of Secondary Education Systems in Asian and

European Countries at the Secondary Level

The education systems at the secondary level in Asian and

European countries present fundamentally different
approaches shaped by distinct cultural values, historical
developments, and societal expectations. These differences
manifest across multiple dimensions including curriculum
design, teaching methodologies, assessment systems,
student experiences, and ultimate educational outcomes.

Asian education systems, particularly those in East Asian

countries like China, Japan, South Korea, and Singapore, are
 characterized by their highly structured and intensive nature.
These systems place paramount importance on academic
excellence, particularly in mathematics and sciences,
viewing education as the primary vehicle for both personal
advancement and national development. The curricula are
typically centralized and standardized, with clearly defined
learning objectives for each grade level. Classroom
instruction tends to be teacher-centered, with educators
delivering content through lectures while students assume
the role of attentive listeners. This approach emphasizes
mastery of core knowledge through repetitive practice and
memorization, creating strong foundations in fundamental
concepts but sometimes at the expense of creative thinking.

The assessment systems in Asian countries create particularly

stark contrasts with their European counterparts. High-
stakes standardized examinations, such as China’s Gaokao,
South Korea’s College Scholastic Ability Test, and Japan’s
National Center Test for University Admissions, dominate
the educational landscape. These tests carry tremendous
weight, often determining students’ entire future educational
and career trajectories. Consequently, secondary education
becomes intensely examination-focused, with students
devoting countless hours to test preparation through regular
schooling, private tutoring, and specialized cram schools.
The pressure to perform creates a highly competitive
environment where academic achievement is closely tied to
personal and family honor.

European secondary education systems, particularly those in

Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Denmark), Germany,
France, and the United Kingdom, present a markedly
 different philosophical approach. These systems typically
emphasize holistic development, seeking to balance
academic learning with social, emotional, and creative
growth. Rather than focusing solely on knowledge
acquisition, European models often prioritize the
development of critical thinking skills, independent learning
capabilities, and real-world application of knowledge.
Classrooms tend to be more interactive and student-
centered, with teachers facilitating discussions, group work,
and project-based learning activities that encourage active
engagement with material.

The structural organization of secondary education differs

significantly between the two regions. Many Asian systems
employ a single-track approach where all students follow
essentially the same academic path until later stages of
secondary education. In contrast, several European
countries, particularly Germany and Switzerland, implement
multi-track systems that separate students into different
educational pathways (academic, technical, vocational) at
relatively early ages based on demonstrated abilities and
interests. The Nordic countries typically favor
comprehensive schools that keep all students together
longer before allowing for specialization.

Assessment practices reveal another key divergence. While Asian

systems rely heavily on standardized, high-stakes
examinations, European approaches generally employ more
varied and continuous forms of assessment. Many European
systems emphasize teacher evaluations, portfolio
assessments, project work, and other formative measures
that provide ongoing feedback rather than relying on a few
 critical examinations. Countries like Finland have minimized
standardized testing in favor of more holistic evaluation
methods that track student progress across multiple
dimensions.

The role and status of teachers also varies considerably between

the regions. In high-performing Asian systems, teachers
command significant respect and operate within clearly
defined curricular frameworks. European teachers,
particularly in countries like Finland, enjoy greater
professional autonomy in how they deliver content and
assess students, often requiring advanced degrees and
ongoing professional development. This difference in
teacher preparation and classroom authority significantly
impacts instructional methods and the overall learning
environment.

Cultural values deeply influence these differing educational

approaches. Asian systems reflect Confucian traditions that
emphasize diligence, respect for authority, and the
transformative power of education. The strong focus on
examinations connects to historical civil service examination
systems and contemporary perceptions of education as the
primary mechanism for social mobility. European systems,
by contrast, often emerge from humanistic traditions that
value individual development, creativity, and the cultivation
of well-rounded citizens prepared for democratic
participation.

Both systems demonstrate notable strengths and face distinct

challenges. Asian systems produce exceptional results in
 international assessments of mathematics and science, with
students demonstrating strong content knowledge and
problem-solving skills within structured parameters.
However, these systems often struggle with student stress
levels, mental health issues, and limitations in fostering
creativity and independent thinking. European systems
typically show strengths in developing critical thinking
abilities, creativity, and student well-being, but sometimes
lag in specific academic benchmarks and may not prepare
students equally well for the intense competition of global
higher education and labor markets.

Recent years have seen some convergence between these

models. Some Asian systems are working to reduce student
stress, incorporate more creative elements, and broaden
curricula beyond test preparation. Similarly, certain European
systems are increasing academic rigor and implementing
more standardized assessments in response to international
comparisons. This mutual adaptation suggests that neither
model is perfect and that the most effective systems may
ultimately incorporate elements from both approaches.

The implications of these differences are profound for students’

daily experiences and long-term development. Asian
students typically face longer school days, more homework,
and greater academic pressure, but develop strong discipline
and work ethic. European students often enjoy more
balanced schedules with greater emphasis on extracurricular
activities, arts, and personal interests, potentially leading to
more well-rounded development but sometimes less
academic intensity.
Ultimately, the comparison reveals that education systems are
deeply cultural phenomena that reflect and perpetuate
societal values. While Asian systems excel in producing high
academic achievement and technical competence, European
systems often do better at fostering creativity, emotional
intelligence, and overall student well-being. The ongoing
challenge for educators and policymakers in both regions is
to learn from each other’s strengths while addressing their
respective weaknesses, potentially moving toward hybrid
models that maximize student potential across all
dimensions of development.

Q.3 Highlight the policy recommendations to improve secondary

education in the educational policy of 2009 and 2017.
Pakistan’s National Education Policies of 2009 and 2017 outlined
comprehensive reforms for secondary education, yet
significant implementation gaps remain. The policies
recognized several critical areas needing improvement, with
key recommendations focusing on curriculum modernization,
teacher quality enhancement, examination reforms,
equitable access, technology integration, governance
strengthening, and vocational education expansion.
Regarding curriculum development, both policies
emphasized shifting from rote memorization to competency-
based learning, with the 2017 policy particularly stressing
 the need to incorporate critical thinking, problem-solving
skills, and digital literacy. They called for establishing
uniform national standards across all provincial boards to
reduce disparities in education quality, a goal that remains
largely unfulfilled due to provincial autonomy challenges.
The policies strongly recommended expanding STEM
education and integrating vocational training at the
secondary level to better align education with labor market
demands.

Teacher quality emerged as a central concern in both policy

documents. The 2009 policy first introduced the concept of
mandatory continuous professional development for
teachers, which the 2017 policy expanded with more specific
guidelines. These included recommendations for rigorous
pre-service training, regular in-service workshops, and
subject-specific capacity building. Both policies highlighted
the need for merit-based recruitment processes to ensure
qualified educators enter the profession, though
implementation has been inconsistent across provinces. The
2017 policy introduced the novel concept of performance-
based incentives, suggesting linking teacher promotions and
salaries to classroom effectiveness and student learning
outcomes, a reform that has seen limited adoption.

Examination and assessment reforms featured prominently in

both policies. They recommended moving away from purely
memory-based testing toward conceptual and application-
 oriented assessments. The 2017 policy particularly
emphasized the need for standardized testing procedures
across all provincial boards to ensure fairness and
comparability. Both documents advocated for introducing
formative assessment methods, including project-based
evaluations and continuous classroom assessments, to
complement traditional board examinations. However, the
resistance to change in examination boards and lack of
teacher training in alternative assessment methods have
hindered progress in this area.

Addressing access and equity issues formed a major component

of both policies. They contained specific strategies to boost
girls’ secondary education enrollment through targeted
initiatives like girls’ stipend programs, dedicated female
schools in rural areas, and community engagement
programs. The policies recognized urban-rural disparities
and recommended infrastructure development in
underserved regions, including construction of new schools,
provision of basic facilities, and transportation solutions.
The 2017 policy broke new ground by including specific
provisions for inclusive education of students with
disabilities, recommending infrastructure adaptations,
specialized teacher training, and modified curricula, though
implementation remains patchy.

Technology integration received increasing emphasis in the 2017

policy compared to 2009. Recommendations included
 equipping schools with digital tools, developing e-learning
resources, and establishing computer labs. The later policy
specifically addressed the need for teacher training in
educational technology to facilitate effective integration of
digital tools in classroom instruction. Both policies
recognized the potential of technology to bridge quality gaps
but underestimated the infrastructure and connectivity
challenges in rural areas.

Governance reforms proposed in both documents focused on

decentralizing education management while maintaining
national standards. The 2009 policy recommended
strengthening provincial and district-level oversight
mechanisms, while the 2017 version added specific
suggestions for transparent budgeting and financial
management to prevent fund misallocation. Both policies
encouraged public-private partnerships in school
management, infrastructure development, and teacher
training programs as a strategy to supplement government
efforts.

Vocational and technical education expansion formed a key

recommendation in both policies, with the 2017 version
providing more detailed implementation strategies. They
proposed establishing technical streams within regular
secondary schools, strengthening existing technical
institutions, and developing linkages with industry to ensure
curriculum relevance. The policies recognized the stigma
 associated with vocational education and recommended
awareness campaigns to change societal perceptions.

The policies shared several cross-cutting recommendations

including increasing education budget allocation to at least
4% of GDP, improving monitoring and evaluation
mechanisms, and ensuring political commitment to long-
term reforms. They emphasized the need for regular policy
reviews and evidence-based adjustments, recommending
establishment of robust education management information
systems. Both documents recognized the importance of
community participation in school governance through
strengthened parent-teacher associations and school
management committees.

Despite these comprehensive recommendations, implementation

has been hampered by several factors including inconsistent
political will, inadequate funding, bureaucratic inefficiencies,
and resistance to change within the education system. The
2017 policy made progress in addressing some gaps in the
2009 version, particularly regarding technology integration,
inclusive education, and vocational training, but failed to
provide strong implementation mechanisms. Moving
forward, Pakistan needs to focus on strict policy
enforcement, adequate resource allocation, and
development of robust monitoring systems to realize the
vision outlined in these education policies. The
recommendations remain largely relevant today and could
 significantly improve secondary education if properly
implemented with necessary adaptations to current needs
and challenges.

Q.4 Describe the need for teacher education institutions for

training of secondary school teachers. Critically examine the
need for in-service training for secondary school teacher.

The establishment of strong teacher education institutions

specifically dedicated to training secondary school teachers
is absolutely crucial for improving education quality at this
critical level. Secondary education serves as the bridge
between basic schooling and higher education or vocational
paths, making it one of the most important phases in a
student’s academic journey. Well-trained secondary teachers
don’t just deliver subject content - they shape adolescents’
critical thinking abilities, career aspirations, and overall
worldview during their formative years. Currently, there’s a
severe gap in Pakistan where many secondary teachers
either lack proper pedagogical training or have outdated
teaching methodologies that fail to engage today’s digitally-
native generation. Specialized teacher education institutions
could address this by providing rigorous pre-service training
that combines subject mastery with modern teaching
 techniques, adolescent psychology understanding, and
classroom management skills tailored specifically for
secondary level challenges.

These institutions need to move beyond the traditional lecture-

based training model and incorporate extensive practical
classroom experience through teaching practicums. Future
secondary teachers should receive specialized training in
their subject areas along with cross-disciplinary approaches
that show how to make connections between different fields
of knowledge. There’s also a pressing need for training in
technology integration, as secondary students today need
digital literacy skills for future workplaces. Teacher
education institutions must also emphasize assessment
literacy - teaching future educators how to design
meaningful evaluations that measure higher-order thinking
rather than just rote memorization. Perhaps most
importantly, these institutions should cultivate reflective
practitioners who continuously evaluate and improve their
teaching methods rather than sticking to outdated
approaches year after year.

When we examine the need for in-service training for current

secondary teachers, the case becomes even more
compelling. The rapid changes in technology, curriculum
reforms, and evolving student needs make continuous
professional development not just beneficial but absolutely
essential. Many secondary teachers in Pakistan today
 received their training decades ago when educational
priorities and classroom realities were completely different.
In-service training programs could help bridge this gap by
updating teachers on modern pedagogical approaches, new
curriculum standards, and emerging educational
technologies. However, the current in-service training system
faces several challenges that need critical examination.
Most programs are one-off workshops that lack follow-up
support, making sustained implementation in actual
classrooms unlikely. There’s often a disconnect between
training content and teachers’ real classroom challenges,
leading to low engagement and adoption. The cascade
training model commonly used tends to dilute content
quality as it filters down through multiple levels.

Effective in-service training needs complete restructuring to

become more impactful. Instead of isolated workshops, it
should adopt a continuous, school-embedded model with
regular coaching and mentoring. Training content must be
practical and immediately applicable, with opportunities for
teachers to practice new techniques in their own classrooms
and receive feedback. Subject-specific training is particularly
crucial at secondary level where content mastery is essential.
Digital platforms could provide ongoing support between
face-to-face sessions, creating professional learning
communities where teachers can share challenges and
solutions. The most successful in-service programs
internationally are those that treat teachers as professionals
capable of reflective practice and innovation, rather than just
 passive recipients of top-down instructions.

The resistance to in-service training among some secondary

teachers stems from several factors that need addressing.
Many view it as additional workload without tangible benefits,
especially when it doesn’t lead to career advancement or
recognition. There’s often skepticism about whether new
methods will actually work better than familiar approaches.
To overcome this, training programs must demonstrate clear
value through visible improvements in student engagement
and learning outcomes. Incentive structures could link
training participation to career progression opportunities.
Perhaps most importantly, teachers need to be involved in
shaping professional development programs based on their
identified needs rather than having generic content imposed
on them.

The changing nature of secondary students themselves makes

ongoing teacher training imperative. Today’s adolescents
have different learning styles, attention spans, and social-
emotional needs compared to previous generations,
influenced heavily by digital technology and social media.
Teachers need training to understand these shifts and adapt
their approaches accordingly. There’s also growing
recognition of the importance of fostering critical thinking,
creativity, and emotional intelligence alongside academic
content - skills that require different teaching methods than
traditional lecture-based instruction. In-service training can
 equip teachers with strategies to develop these
competencies in their students.

Assessment literacy is another critical area where secondary

teachers need continuous updating. As curricula move
toward competency-based learning, teachers must be
trained in designing and evaluating performance tasks,
projects, and other alternative assessments that measure
deeper learning. Many secondary teachers currently lack
these skills, defaulting to traditional testing methods that
don’t align with modern educational goals. Quality in-service
programs could fill this gap while also training teachers in
using assessment data to improve instruction.

The integration of technology in secondary classrooms presents

both opportunities and challenges that necessitate teacher
training. While digital tools can enhance learning, many
secondary teachers lack confidence in using them
effectively. Targeted in-service programs should go beyond
basic digital literacy to focus on pedagogical integration -
how to use technology to achieve specific learning
objectives rather than as mere add-ons. Training should also
address the challenges of technology use, such as
maintaining student focus and evaluating online source
credibility.

In Pakistan’s context, where educational disparities exist across

 regions and school systems, in-service training can play a
crucial equalizing role. Well-designed programs can help
standardize teaching quality across government and private
schools, urban and rural institutions. They can also support
the implementation of national curriculum reforms by
ensuring all teachers understand and can effectively deliver
new content and approaches. However, this requires training
programs to be accessible to all teachers, including those in
remote areas through blended learning models.

The economic argument for investing in teacher education

institutions and in-service training is compelling. Quality
secondary education directly impacts workforce readiness
and national development. When teachers are well-prepared
and continuously updated, student learning outcomes
improve, reducing the need for private tutoring and remedial
education. Effective training can also improve teacher
retention by increasing job satisfaction and professional
identity. However, these benefits only materialize when
training programs are properly designed, adequately funded,
and systematically implemented with clear quality controls.

Ultimately, both pre-service teacher education and ongoing in-

service training for secondary teachers should be viewed as
complementary components of a continuous professional
growth continuum rather than separate initiatives. Strong
teacher education institutions set the foundation, while
quality in-service programs ensure teaching practices evolve
 with changing needs. Pakistan’s education system needs to
prioritize both to raise secondary education standards and
prepare students for 21st century challenges. The cost of
not investing in teacher development is far greater -
perpetuating outdated teaching methods that fail to engage
students or equip them with necessary skills for future
success.

Q.5: Describe the skills needed to live in the 21st century and the
challenges of improving secondary education in
underdeveloped countries, like Pakistan.

Living successfully in the 21st century demands an entirely new

set of skills that go far beyond traditional academic
knowledge. The rapid pace of technological change,
globalization, and shifting job markets have created a world
where adaptability and continuous learning are more
valuable than memorized facts. At the core, individuals need
strong digital literacy - not just basic computer skills but the
ability to navigate, evaluate, and create digital content
responsibly in an era of information overload. Critical
thinking has become non-negotiable, as we’re bombarded
with conflicting information and need to separate facts from
misinformation. Problem-solving skills that combine
 creativity with analytical reasoning are essential for tackling
complex real-world challenges that don’t come with textbook
answers. Communication skills have expanded to include
not just clear writing and speaking, but the ability to
collaborate effectively across cultures and time zones in
virtual environments. Emotional intelligence and
interpersonal skills matter tremendously in workplaces that
increasingly value teamwork and leadership. Financial
literacy is crucial for navigating modern economies, while
environmental awareness helps address pressing global
challenges. Perhaps most importantly, the skill of learning
how to learn has become fundamental, as the half-life of
professional knowledge shrinks and career changes become
more frequent.

For underdeveloped countries like Pakistan, equipping secondary

students with these 21st century skills presents enormous
challenges rooted in systemic educational weaknesses. The
most fundamental obstacle lies in the outdated structure of
secondary education itself, which remains largely focused on
rote memorization and high-stakes testing rather than skill
development. Classrooms are often overcrowded, with
student-teacher ratios that make personalized or interactive
learning nearly impossible. The physical infrastructure of
many schools lacks basic facilities, let alone technology
resources needed for digital skill development. Electricity
shortages and unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas
create additional barriers to implementing modern teaching
methods.
The teaching workforce itself faces significant limitations in
delivering 21st century education. Many secondary teachers
in Pakistan received their own education through traditional
methods and struggle to model or teach the skills they
weren’t taught themselves. Professional development
opportunities are scarce, especially in rural areas, leaving
teachers without training in modern pedagogies. Low
salaries and poor working conditions demotivate even
talented educators, while political interference in
appointments often prioritizes connections over teaching
competence. The examination system reinforces outdated
approaches by continuing to test memorization rather than
higher-order thinking skills, creating a vicious cycle where
teachers “teach to the test.”

Curriculum development presents another major challenge.

Pakistan’s education system maintains artificial separations
between subjects that should be integrated for holistic skill
development. The curriculum revision process is slow and
bureaucratic, making it difficult to respond to emerging
needs. There’s also tension between global skill
requirements and local cultural values, particularly regarding
gender roles and social norms. Textbooks often contain
outdated information and fail to present knowledge in ways
that develop critical analysis. The emphasis on Urdu and
English language instruction sometimes comes at the
expense of conceptual understanding, leaving students
struggling with comprehension in both languages.
Socioeconomic factors create additional layers of difficulty.
Poverty forces many students to balance schooling with
work obligations or drop out entirely. Gender disparities
persist, especially in rural areas where cultural norms limit
girls’ access to education. Malnutrition and health issues
impair cognitive development, while lack of electricity at
home prevents students from engaging with digital learning
resources. The growing divide between elite private schools
and underfunded government schools creates unequal
access to quality education that develops modern skills.

Political instability and inconsistent education policies exacerbate

these challenges. Frequent changes in government lead to
shifting priorities and abandoned reforms. Education
budgets remain inadequate and often fail to reach schools
due to corruption and mismanagement. Decentralization to
provinces after the 18th Amendment created coordination
challenges in maintaining national standards. Security
concerns in some regions disrupt schooling and limit
educational opportunities.

Despite these formidable obstacles, there are pathways forward

for improving Pakistan’s secondary education system.
Curriculum reforms should integrate 21st century skills
across all subjects rather than treating them as separate
additions. Teacher education programs need complete
overhaul to emphasize modern pedagogies and ongoing
 professional development. Examination systems must
evolve to assess and therefore incentivize the teaching of
higher-order thinking skills. Public-private partnerships could
help bridge resource gaps, particularly in technology access.
Most importantly, education must become a genuine
national priority with sustained political commitment and
increased funding allocations.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. As automation transforms global

job markets, Pakistan risks being left with a workforce
unprepared for the jobs of tomorrow. The country’s large
youth population represents either a tremendous
demographic dividend or a crisis in waiting, depending
entirely on the quality of education they receive. Developing
21st century skills in secondary students isn’t just about
individual success - it’s about national competitiveness and
social stability in an increasingly complex world. While the
challenges are substantial, they are not insurmountable with
focused, sustained effort and a clear vision for what modern
education should achieve. The alternative - maintaining the
status quo - would condemn generations of Pakistani youth
to falling further behind in the global arena.