Integrity Check Spreadsheet For ABA Program Applications
Uploaded by
ScribdTranslationsIntegrity Check Spreadsheet For ABA Program Applications
Uploaded by
ScribdTranslationsIntegrity check spreadsheet for ABA program applications
Applicator: Supervisor: Data:
Observation time: Local: Patient:
Punctuation
If the performance occurred consistently throughout the session
If the performance occurred inconsistently during the session
If the performance did not occur or occurred at a very low frequency during the session
If not applicable, do not fill out and paint in blue.
Target 1st assessment 2nd assessment 3rd assessment 4th evaluation Comments
Material optimization
There was organization of the materials
A1 prior to the start of the intervention
There were no unnecessary distractions in
A2 intervention area
There was optimization of the chair and table
A3 (if necessary)
If there is a visual agenda, it was used and
A4 prepared properly
Total 0% 0% 0% 0%
Participation strategies and
engagement
Demonstrated appropriate level of
B1 enthusiasm, fun, and physical interaction
The applicator uses and modifies the rhythm of the
instructions according to the need
B2 of the student
The applicator follows the hierarchy of
B3 attention
The applicator engages the patient before
Before giving an instruction
The applicator alters the environment to generate
B5 establishing operation
Total 0% 0% 0% 0%
Skills for implementation of
program
C1 Applicator follows the steps of the program
Applicator requires correct performance
C2 of the patient in relation to the target
The list of stimuli was correctly
C3 followed
Learned stimuli were integrated
C4 within the session appropriately
The data was recorded in a way
C5 correct
Total 0% 0% 0% 0%
Use of tips
The tips were used to prevent.
D1 errors when necessary
D2 used appropriate tips for ostpos
The frequency and duration of the tips were
Appropriate D3
The student was required successively.
approaches to the target in a more
Independent D4 possible
Tips were faded during the
attempt blocks, in the way that
D5 described in the program
Total 0% 0% 0% 0%
Error correction
The error correction procedure was
implemented correctly and
E1 consistently
Demanded an independent response before
reinforce following procedure of
E2 error correction
The requirement was reduced when the errors.
E3 will persist
Total 0% 0% 0% 0%
Reinforcement strategy
The reinforcement was efficient and appropriate
F1 for the student
The reinforcer was delivered at moments
F2 appropriate
Used chip economy effectively
F3 correct when specified
Reinforcers were easily
Accessible F4
Duration, location, and frequency were
appropriate according to the task
F5 completed
The choices and preferences of the student
were integrated into the strategy of
F6 reinforcement
Reinforcer research was conducted on
F7 log in
Total 0% 0% 0% 0%
Problem behavior
The applicator made the customer happy, relaxed.
and engaged before starting the session, for
G1 at least 5 minutes
The procedures were related
to Functional Analysis, as described in the
G2 PTS
The applicator reinforced behaviors
G3 alternatives
Registro de dados de comportamentos
inadequate was done in a way
G4 appropriate
The applicator reinforced precursors of
problem behavior in order to
G5 avoid severe crises
The applicator enriched the environment of
way to help the customer be happy,
relaxed and engaged after the
G6 problem behavior
The applicant respects the moment of
customer reinforcement without offering
G7 demands
The applicator finished the session with the
G8 happy, relaxed, and engaged customer
Total 0% 0% 0% 0%
Generalization
The applicator took advantage of moments of
naturalistic education to promote
H1 generalization of teaching
The data registration was carried out in a
appropriate H2
Total 0% 0% 0% 0%
General table 12/30/1899 12/30/1899 12/30/1899 12/30/1899
Materials and location 0% 0% 0% 0%
Participation strategies and
engagement 0% 0% 0% 0%
Program implementation 0% 0% 0% 0%
Use of tips 0% 0% 0% 0%
Error correction 0% 0% 0% 0%
Reinforcement strategy 0% 0% 0% 0%
Problem behavior 0% 0% 0% 0%
Generalization 0% 0% 0% 0%
Total General 0% 0% 0% 0%
Applicator Performance
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Name of the applicator
Supervisor's name
Evaluation Points Data Cor
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
B5 C5 D5
A4 B4 C4 D4
A3 B3 C3 D3 E3
A2 B2 C2 D2 E2
A1 B1 C1 D1 E1
Strategies of Skills for
participation and implementation of
Materials engagement program Use of Tips
G8
F7 G7
F6 G6
F5 G5
F4 G4
F3 G3
F2 G2 H2
F1 G1 H1
Strategy of Behavior-
Error correction reinforcement problem Generalization
