Recruitment and Selection in Automotive Industry
Recruitment and Selection in Automotive Industry
NO NO
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
AND THEORETICAL 15-18
III FRAMEWORK
V CONCLUSION 75
BIBLIOGRAPHY 76
APPENDICES 77
CONTENT OF TABLE
LIST OF TABLE
TABLE NO LIST OF TABLES PAGE NO
2 QUALIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS 18
4 SOURCE OF RECRUITMENT 22
2 QUALIFICATIONS OF RESPONDENTS 18
4 SOURCE OF RECRUITMENT 22
INTRODUCTION
AND
DESIGN OF STUDY
1.1 INTRODUCTIONDr. A.S ALAGU KANNA, MBA., Ph.D.,
AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY
The Automotive Industry in India is the fourth-largest in the world as per 2021 statistics. In
2022, India became fourth largest country in the world by valuation of automotive industry. As of
2020, India is the 5th largest automobile market in the world, surpassing Germany in terms of sales.
Currently India's auto industry is worth of more than US$ 100 billion and contributes 8% of the
country's total export and accounts for 2.3% of India's GDP. India's major automobile manufacturing
companies includes Tata Motors, Ashok Leyland, Mahindra & Mahindra, Force Motors, Tractors
and Farm Equipment Limited, Eicher Motors, Royal Enfield, Sonalika Tractors, Hindustan Motors,
ICML, Kerala Automobiles Limited, Reva, Pravaig Dynamics, Premier, Tara International and
Vehicle Factory Jabalpur.
The Indian Automobile Industry stands one of the largest across the globe, contributing more
than 7% to India’s GDP. This highly competitive auto sector set in motion an equally aggressive
automotive servicing and repair industry which is estimated to be worth Rs. 34,000 crores by the
year 2020. Moreover, the rapidly growing presence and the arrival of big car brands in the country is
driving the Indian car market towards becoming a world leader in the coming years.
Service Sector in India today accounts for more than half of India’s GDP. According to data
for the Financial Year 21 was 22.65 million vehicles, and 13 million vehicles were produced
between April-October 2021. The two wheelers segment dominates the market in terms of volume
owing to a growing middle class, and a huge percentage of India’s population being young.
Moreover, the growing interest of the companies in exploring the rural markets further aided the
growth of the sector. India is also a prominent auto exporter and has strong export growth
expectations for the near future. In addition, several initiatives by the Government of India and major
automobile players in the Indian market is expected to make India one of the leaders in the two-
wheeler and four-wheeler market in the world by 2022.
2
SELECTION:
The aim of selection is to find a person who accepts the position and who gives
satisfactory service and performance in the long term. The system approach starts from the
position of well-defined job and clearly analyzes the specifications. Selection is not just a
question of interviewing, although it is most popular device in use.
Selection is very much a process of deselecting, that is gradually eliminating
candidates until finally one is left on the list for a vacancy. Some methods are more reliable
than other but, to large extent. Selection is about trying to minimize risk and maximizing
certainty of making of the right decision.
ESSENTIALS OF SELECTION PROCEDURE:
The selection process can be successful if the following requirements are satisfied:
• Someone should have the authority to select. This authority comes from the employment
requisition, as developed by an analysis of the work load and work force.
• There must be some standard of personnel with which a prospective employee may be
compared, i.e. a comprehensive job description and job specification should be available
beforehand.
• There must be a sufficient number of applicants from whom the required number of
employees may be selected.
Organizations face significant challenges in attracting and retaining top talent. A study on
recruitment and selection can help identify effective strategies for acquiring and retaining skilled
employees. In today's competitive business environment, organizations need to develop
innovative recruitment and selection strategies to stay ahead of the competition. This study can
provide insights into best practices and emerging trends in recruitment and [Link]
3
diversity and inclusion in the workplace is critical for organizational success. A study on
recruitment and selection can help identify strategies for promoting diversity and inclusion in the
hiring [Link] and selection can be costly and time-consuming. This study can help
identify ways to streamline the recruitment and selection process, reducing costs and improving
[Link] quality of hire is critical for organizational success. A study on recruitment and
selection can help identify strategies for improving the quality of hire and reducing turnover.
The scope of this study is to investigate the employee recruitment and selection
process in [industry/organization], with a focus on identifying effective strategies,
challenges.
1. To identify the current recruitment and selection methods, tools, and techniques.
2. To examine the challenges and opportunities facing in its recruitment and selection
efforts.
3. To investigate the role of diversity and inclusion in the recruitment and selection
process.
4. To explore the impact of emerging trends, such as AI and social media, on the
recruitment and selection process.
4
1.6 Sampling Design
Input Variables
Output Variables
Chapter-1 It deals with the Introduction, Need of the study, scope of the study.
Objectives of the study, hypothesis, data collection method, sampling design,
Frame work Analysis and scheme of the report.
6
2.1 INDUSTRY PROFILE
INTRODUCTION
The Indian automobile industry is one of the largest and most competitive sectors globally, playing a
vital role in the country's economic growth. It contributes significantly to GDP, employment, and
exports while driving advancements in technology and manufacturing. With rising demand for
vehicles, the industry has witnessed rapid expansion, attracting global and domestic manufacturers.
the following passages provide an in-depth overview of the automobile industry, covering its market
size, economic impact, key players, and emerging trends shaping its future.
2.2 RECRUITMENT:
Recruitment refers to the process of finding possible candidates for a job or function,
undertaken by recruiters. It may be undertaken by an employment agency or a member of
staff at the business or organization looking for recruits. Either way it may involve
advertising, commonly in the recruitment section of a newspaper or in a newspaper dedicated
to job adverts.
Employment agencies will often advertise jobs in their windows. Posts can also be
advertised at a job center if they are targeting the unemployed. Suitability for a job is
typically assessed by looking for skills, e.g. Machining skills, CNC/VMC programming,
setting skills. Evidence for skills required for a job may be provided in the form of
qualifications, experience in a job requiring the relevant skills or the testimony of references.
Employment agencies may also give computerized tests to assess an individual's off
hand knowledge of software packages or typing skills. At a more basic level written tests may
be given to assess numeric and literacy. A candidate may also be assessed on the basis of an
interview.
7
the axle-load norms—turned into a full-blown conflagration, at a scale not experienced in the last
two decades, as fundamental economic challenges roiled the Indian automotive industry. Credit
availability fell, demand slowed (especially in infrastructure and mining), and discretionary spending
dropped, all of which contributed to a decline in auto sales. In early 2020, just as the industry was
expected to recover, the COVID-19 pandemic introduced challenges that hurt demand and interfered
with the automotive industry’s deeply intertwined supply chains. More recently, however, the
situation has looked brighter. In late 2020, government travel restrictions eased, India’s harvest was
good, and the festive season stimulated demand in some high-volume segments.
8
2.4 COMPANY PROFILE
Introduction:
TVS Groups is an Indian multinational conglomerate with its principal headquarters in Madurai and
international headquarters in Chennai. It has more than 50 subsidiaries including the two-wheeler
manufacturer TVS Motor Company and TVS Supply Chain Solutions. The TVS Group traces its
origins to a rural transport service, founded in 1911 in Tamil Nadu, India. Today, this renowned
business conglomerate remains faithful to its core ideals of trust, values, service and ethics. TVS
Motor Company is India's third-largest motorcycle company in terms of revenue. It is also the
second largest two-wheeler exporter in India, exporting to over 60 countries.
The TVS Group is India’s leading supplier of automotive components and one of the country’s most
respected business groups. With a combined turnover of over $ 6.5 Billion, the TVS Group employs
a total workforce of close to over 39,000 employees. Charting a steady growth path of expansion and
diversification, the group currently comprises around 50 companies. These operate in diverse fields
that range from two-wheeler and automotive component manufacturing to automotive dealerships,
finance and electronics. Uniting these multiple businesses is a common ethos of quality, customer
service and social responsibility.
TVS Motor company is an Indian multinational motorcycle manufacturer headquartered in Chennai.
It is the third largest motorcycle company in India in terms of revenue. The company has annual
sales of three million vehicles. TVS Motor company is also the second largest two-wheeler exporter
in India with exports to over 60 countries. TVS Motor company is the flagship company of the TVS
Group, being the largest company of the group in terms of valuation and turnover. The logo for TVS
Motor company features a red horse.
9
Founder
Thirukkurungudi Vengaram Sundram Iyengar (22 March 1877 – 28 April 1955) was an
Indian industrialist and automobile pioneer. In 1911, he founded T. V. Sundram Iyengar &
Sons, a bus company which later diversified into automobile production and emerged as the
parent company of the TVS Group, one of India’s biggest business conglomerates. With his
humble beginning as a lawyer, he grew into one of the most successful industrialists of his time.
TVS Motors is a prominent two-wheeler and three-wheeler manufacturer in India. It was founded in
1978 as a division of TVS Group, a well-known conglomerate with interests in various industries
such as automotive components, logistics, electronics, and textiles. Over the years, TVS Motors has
become a household name in India, and its products are sold in over 60 countries across the world. In
this article, we will take a closer look at the history of TVS Motors, from its inception to its status as
a leading player in the Indian automobile industry.
TVS Motors started a joint venture between TVS Group and Suzuki Motor Corporation of Japan.
The company was initially named TVS-Suzuki and began producing two-wheelers in a factory
located in Hosur, Tamil Nadu. The first product to roll out of the factory was the Suzuki-licensed
moped, which was a popular mode of transportation in India at the time. The company quickly
gained popularity for its reliable and fuel-efficient vehicles, and its product portfolio expanded to
include motorcycles and scooters.
TVS and Suzuki shared a one-year-long relationship that was aimed at technology transfer for design
and manufacture of two-wheelers specifically for the Indian market. Re-christened TVS-Suzuki, the
company brought out several models such as the Suzuki Supra, Suzuki Samurai, Suzuki Shogun and
10
Suzuki Shaolin. In 2001, after separating ways with Suzuki, the company was renamed TVS Motor,
relinquishing its rights to use the Suzuki name.
2.5HISTORY: -
11
TVS Mobility is the holding company for the businesses managed by the T S Rajam family
members. The companies housed under TVS Mobility evolved from the business started by TV
Sundaram Iyengar in 1911. Businesses under the TVS Mobility group are being managed by the 4 th
generation family members, descendants of T V Sundaram Iyengar. TVS Mobility is the holding
company for the businesses managed by the T S Rajam family members. The companies housed
under TVS Mobility evolved from the business started by T V Sundaram Iyengar in 1911.
Businesses under the TVS Mobility group are being managed by the 4 th generation family
members, descendants of T V Sundaram Iyengar.
PARTNERS: -
TVS Mobility is proud to be an exclusive and authorized Corporate Dealer for Renault India in
Kerala since 2011, with 33 sales and 16 service outlets across the state. The Renault Group is an
international company, of French origin, they design, manufacture, and market private and utility
vehicles.
At TVS Mobility, we excel in every area of customer service. In addition to offering the full range of
Renault vehicles, we work hard to ensure we deliver first-class service and enhance the customer
experience - whether it is buying, servicing, financing, or purchasing parts and accessories. Our team
is passionate about the superior quality and unique style each Renault has to offer and we’re
confident customers will have an enhanced experience when they visit us, every single time.
Companies can use these bonuses as incentives for exemplary work practices or to congratulate and
thank employees who achieve certain goals. Professionals who exceed production expectations can
earn performance bonuses. Companies use these bonuses as motivating incentives to improve the
quality of their employee's work. While it is possible for a professional to negotiate a performance
bonus, employers typically offer these incentives when they can afford. Performance appraisal can
help create a healthy competition between colleagues and help employees compare and improve
upon their skills if needed. It can also be used to select candidates for promotions, assignments to
important projects, or other purposes
2.7SERVICES
Sale
maintenance
repair of vehicle
related parts and accessories
2.8VISION:
To consistently deliver exceptional value and service to our employees, customers, and stakeholders.
we are committed to driving positive social and environmental impact through our operations and
partnerships, while making a meaningful difference in the communities where we operate.
13
2.9MISSION
To be the industry's most reliable and efficient organisation. Through the companies housed under TVS
Mobility, we want to continuously push the boundaries of what is possible. With over 25000 employees
and establishments in over 25 countries, we are focused on expanding our reach andmoving into newer
markets. We are committed to sustainability, safety, and continuous improvement .
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
VICE PRESIDENT
FUNCTIONAL DEPARTMENTS
FITTER
FITTER
ASSISTANT
14
3.1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
This chapter describes about the research design, signification of study,
objective of the study, hypothesis of the study and research methodology with collection of
data and presentation of the study. This chapter also explains the review of literature pertinent
to the research study. An attempt has been made to take review of prior studies on the topic.
15
According to Ghosh and Kumar (1991) the process of business planning can be
considered in four parts viz. The analysis of factors affecting the future, forecasting the future
environment, preparing the plan and installing the plan.
One of the research studies concluded that the speed of setting up industries in
jalna district is so slow, because infrastructural deviancies research is based on primary and
secondary data collected that the DIC, Jalna had shown better performance in implementation
of the scheme.
Michael, Bruer and Maki opine that succession planning needs to be modifies
if it is to remain a relevant means of regenerating companies leadership. there are several
cause of the gap between the promises of traditional succession planning and what is
delivered the most important goal is developing strong leadership teams for strategic tasks.
the means of doing this lies in succession management, which offers a more flexible and
dynamic approach for developing strong leadership teams.
Sivaprakasam (2000) says that planning for retirement is an effective human resource
solution making organizations forward thinking. According to him planning for retirement
seem to be left to the individual rather than the organization, which actually could leverage
the maximum from the human resource capital through planned retirement policy. he has
suggested that a retirement chart may be very useful which may indicate the year wise,
16
category wise, age wise number of employees serving at present and would retire at different
points of time.
17
3.2THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK:
1. Theoretical Foundations
Several theories underpin recruitment and selection:
Human Capital Theory (Becker, 1964) – Organizations invest in employees like assets,
selecting candidates based on their skills and potential contributions.
Person-Job Fit Theory (Edwards, 1991) – Ensures candidates’ skills, knowledge, and
abilities match job requirements.
2. Job Analysis & Description – Defining job roles, skills, and competencies required.
3. Sourcing Candidates – Using job portals, social media, referrals, and internal hiring.
2. Assessment Methods:
o Cognitive and personality tests
o Behavioral and technical interviews
o Work simulations and assessment centers
3. Decision-Making & Job Offer – Selecting the best candidate based on structured criteria.
18
Table 4.1 Age group of the respondents
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is indicates that 30% of the respondents are 31 -40 years, 20% of the
respondents are 41-50 years, 22% of the respondents are 21-30 years, 22 % of the
respondents are 51 & Above, 6 % of the respondents are below 20 years.
Chart-4.1
Age group of the respondents
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
factor Below20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51&Above
19
Table-4.2 Qualification of the respondents
1 ITI 0 0
2 Diploma 20 40
3 UG 18 36
4 PG 8 16
5 Others 4 8
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is shows that 16% of the respondents are PG, 40% of the respondents
are diploma, 36% of the respondents are UG, 0 % of the respondents are ITI, 8 % of the
respondents are others.
20
Chart-4.2
40
35
30
25
20 Percentage
15
10
0
Factor ITI Diploma UG PG Others
From the above chart it is shows that 16% of the respondents are PG, 40% of the respondents
are diploma, 36% of the respondents are UG, 0 % of the respondents are ITI, 8 % of the
respondents are others.
21
Table-4.3 Experience of the respondents
1 Below 3 10 20
2 3 - 5 Years 16 32
3 5 - 10 Years 13 26
4 10 -15 Years 7 14
5 Above 15 4 8
Total 50 100
Inference
From the above table it is observes that 32% of the respondents are 3-5 years, 20% of the
respondents are below 3, 26 % of the respondents are 5-10 years, 14% of the respondents are
10-15 years, 8% of the respondents are above 15.
22
Chart -4.3
Experience of the respondents
From the chart table it is observes that 32% of the respondents are 3-5 years, 20% of the
respondents are below 3, 26 % of the respondents are 5-10 years, 14% of the respondents are
10-15 years, 8% of the respondents are above 15.
23
Table-4.4 Source of recruitment
1 Internal 10 20
2 External 31 62
3 Both 9 18
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is clears that 62% of the respondents are external, 20% of the
respondents are internal, 18% of the respondents are both.
24
Chart –4.4
Source of recruitment
70
60
50
40
percentage
30
20
10
0
Internal External Both
25
Table-4.5 Technique is approached the organization for employment
S. no Factor Respondents Percentage
1 Consultants 24 48
2 Job sites 10 20
3 Advertisements 12 24
4 Reference 4 8
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is shows that 48% of the respondents are consultants, 20% of the
respondents are job sites, 24% of the respondents are advertisement, 8% of the respondents
are reference.
26
Chart-4.5
Technique is approached the organization for employment
percentage
48
24
20
From the above chart it is shows that 48% of the respondents are consultants, 20% of the
respondents are job sites, 24% of the respondents are advertisement, 8% of the respondents
are reference.
27
Table-4.6 The organization offers which type of recruitment for its
employees
S. Factor Respondents Percentage
no
3 Both 10 20
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is shows that 54% of the respondents are temporary basis
employment, 20% of the respondents are both, 26% of the respondents are permanent basis
employment.
28
Chart-4.6
The organization offers which type of recruitment for its employees
20 %
54 %
26 %
From the above chart it is shows that 54% of the respondents are temporary basis employment,
20% of the respondents are both, 26% of the respondents are permanent basis employment.
29
Table-4.7 Present system of recruitment in the organization
1 Yes 32 64
2 No 18 36
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is indicates that 64% of the respondents are yes, 36% of the
respondents are no.
30
Chart-4.7
Present system of recruitment in the organization
64
36
Yes No
From the above chart it is indicates that 64% of the respondents are yes, 36% of the
respondents are no.
31
Table-4.8
Job gives for the prestige process in the organization
Total 50 100
Inference
From the above table it is clears that 34% of the respondents are neutral, 20% of the
respondents are disagree, 20% respondents are strongly agree, 16% of the respondents are
agree, 10% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
32
Chart-4.8
Job gives for the prestige process in the organization
percentage
percentage
34
20 20
16
10
From the above chart it is clears that 34% of the respondents are neutral, 20% of the
respondents are disagree, 20% respondents are strongly agree, 16% of the respondents are
agree, 10% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
33
Table-4.9
HR provides adequate pool of quality applicants:
1 Yes 28 56
2 No 22 44
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is indicates that 56% of the respondents are yes, 44% of the
respondents are no.
34
Chart-4.9 HR provides adequate pool of quality applicants
percentage
percentage
56
44
Yes No
From the above chart it is indicates that 56% of the respondents are yes, 44% of the
respondents are no.
35
Table-4.10 Type of following test conducted during the time of recruitment
1 Aptitude test 12 24
2 Projective test 10 20
3 Judgment test 28 56
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is shows that 24% of the respondents are aptitude test, 20% of the
respondents are projective test, 56% of the respondents are judgment test.
36
Chart-4.10
24 %
56 %
20 %
From the above table it is shows that 24% of the respondents are aptitude test, 20% of the
respondents are projective test, 56% of the respondents are judgment test.
37
Table-4.11 the average time spent by HR department for the candidate:
1 10 minutes 3 6
2 10 to 20 minutes 5 10
3 20 to 30 minutes 13 26
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is shows that 6% of the respondents are 10 minutes, 10% of the
respondents are job 10-20 minutes, 16% of the respondents are 20-30 minutes, 58% of the
respondents are more than 30 minutes.
38
Chart-4.11
10 minutes 10 to 20 minutes
6
% 10 %
58 % 26 %
From the above chart it is shows that 6% of the respondents are 10 minutes, 10% of the
respondents are job 10-20 minutes, 16% of the respondents are 20-30 minutes, 58% of the
respondents are more than 30 minutes
39
Table-4.12
1 Yes 18 36
2 No 32 64
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is indicates that 36% of the respondents are yes, 64% of the
respondents are no.
40
Chart-4.12
The organization doing timelines recruitment and interview process:
64
36
Yes No
From the above chart it is indicates that 36% of the respondents are yes, 64% of the
respondents are no.
41
Table-4.13
1 Educational 24 48
qualifications
2 Legal background 6 12
check
3 Reference check 12 24
4 Family background 8 16
check
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is shows that 48% of the respondents are educational qualifications,
12% of the respondents are job legal background check, 24% of the respondents reference
check,16% of the respondents are family background check.
42
Chart-4.13
16 %
48 %
24 %
12 %
From the above chart it is shows that 48% of the respondents are educational qualifications,
12% of the respondents are job legal background check, 24% of the respondents reference
check,16% of the respondents are family background check.
43
Table-4.14 The training will be given to the employees are recruited in the
organization
1 Strongly agree 10 20
2 Agree 14 28
3 Neutral 12 24
4 Disagree 4 8
5 Strongly disagree 10 20
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is indicates that 20% of the respondents are strongly disagree, 28% of
the respondents are agree, 24% of the respondents are neutral, 20% of the respondents are
strongly agree, 8% of the respondents are disagree.
44
Chart-4.14 the training will be given to the employees are recruited in the
organization
Strongly Strongly
disagree agree
20% 20%
Disagree
8%
Agree
Neutral 28%
24%
From the above chart it is indicates that 20% of the respondents are strongly disagree, 28% of
the respondents are agree, 24% of the respondents are neutral, 20% of the respondents are
strongly agree, 8% of the respondents are disagree.
45
Table-4.15 Vacancies are recruited by the selection process
2 Fresher 15 30
3 Both 19 38
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is indicates that 32% of the respondents are existing person leaving
the organization, 38% of the respondents are both, 30% of the respondents are fresher.
46
Chart-4.15
Vacancies are recruited by the selection process
38
32 30
From the above chart it is indicates that 32% of the respondents are existing person leaving the
organization, 38% of the respondents are both, 30% of the respondents are fresher.
47
Table-4.16 Recruitment plays an important role in the organization
1 Strongly agree 15 30
2 Agree 12 24
3 Neutral 6 12
4 Disagree 8 16
5 Strongly disagree 9 18
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is shows that 30% of the respondents are strongly agree, 16% of the
respondents are disagree, 24% of the respondents are agree, 18% of the respondents are
strongly disagree, 12% of the respondents are neutral.
48
Chart-4.16
Recruitment plays an important role in the organization
18%
30%
16%
12% 24%
From the above cha it is shows that 30% of the respondents are strongly agree, 16% of the
respondents are disagree, 24% of the respondents are agree, 18% of the respondents are
strongly disagree, 12% of the respondents are neutral.
49
Table-4.17 After recruitment the employees should be given correct placement
1 Strongly agree 17 34
2 Agree 13 26
3 Neutral 7 14
4 Disagree 9 18
5 Strongly disagree 4 8
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is shows that 34% of the respondents are strongly agree, 26% of the
respondents are agree, 14% of the respondents are neutral, 18% of the respondents are
disagree, 8% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
50
Chart-4.17
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
disagree
percentage
From the above chart it is shows that 34% of the respondents are strongly agree,
26% of the respondents are agree, 14% of the respondents are neutral, 18% of the respondents
are disagree, 8% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
51
Table-4.18
The placement is not good in an organization, it leads to less productivity
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is indicates that 16%of the respondents are strongly agree, 14% of the
respondents are agree, 44% of the respondents are neutral, 18% of the respondents are
disagree, 8% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
52
Chart-4.18
44
16 18
14
8
From the above chart it is shows that 34% of the respondents are strongly agree, 26% of the
respondents are agree, 14% of the respondents are neutral, 18% of the respondents are
disagree, 8% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
53
Table-4.19
Do you have referral policy in your organization?
1 Yes 28 56
2 No 22 44
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is indicates that 56% of the respondents are yes, 44% of the
respondents are no.
54
Chart-4.19
Do you have referral policy in your organization?
56
44
Yes No
From the above chart it is shows that 34% of the respondents are strongly agree, 26% of the
respondents are agree, 14% of the respondents are neutral, 18% of the respondents are
disagree, 8% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
55
Table-4.20
The right jobs in being performed by the deserved person at your working
area:
1 Strongly agree 4 8
2 Agree 14 28
3 Neutral 12 24
4 Strongly disagree 7 28
5 Disagree 6 12
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is indicates that 8%of the respondents are strongly agree, 28% of the
respondents are agree, 24% of the respondents are neutral, 28% of the respondents are
disagree, 12% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
56
Chart-4.20
The right jobs in being performed by the deserved person at your working
area:
percentage
percentage
28 28
24
12
8
From the above chart it is indicates that 8%of the respondents are strongly agree, 28% of the
respondents are agree, 24% of the respondents are neutral, 28% of the respondents are
disagree, 12% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
57
Table-4.21
Satisfaction level of the selection procedures adopted by the ST couriers in
process of recruitment:
1 Highly satisfied 18 36
2 Satisfied 14 28
3 Neutral 5 10
4 Dissatisfied 7 14
5 Highly dissatisfied 6 12
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is indicates that 36%of the respondents are highly satisfied, 28% of
the respondents are satisfied,10% of the respondents are neutral, 14% of the respondents are
dissatisfied, 12% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied .
58
Chart-4.21
36
28
14 12
10
From the above chart it is indicates that 36%of the respondents are highly satisfied, 28% of
the respondents are satisfied,10% of the respondents are neutral, 14% of the respondents are
dissatisfied, 12% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied .
59
Table-4.22 The overall opinion about personnel recruitment, selection in the
organization
1 Excellent 11 22
2 Good 13 26
3 Average 9 18
4 Fair 12 24
5 Poor 5 10
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is clears that 24% of the respondents are fair, 26% of the respondents
are good, 22% of the respondents are excellent, 18% of the respondents are average, 10% of
the respondents are poor.
60
Chart-4.22 The overall opinion about personnel recruitment, selection in the
organization
10%
22%
24%
26%
18%
From the above chart it is clears that 24% of the respondents are fair, 26% of the respondents
are good, 22% of the respondents are excellent, 18% of the respondents are average, 10% of
the respondents are poor.
61
Table-4.23 Tests are conducted at the time of recruitment process
Inference:
From the above table it is observes that 32% of the respondents are written test, 22% of the
respondents are oral test, 22% of the respondents are physical test, 16% of the respondents
are all, 8% of the respondents are mental ability test.
62
Chart-4.23
Tests are conducted at the time of recruitment process
From the above chart it is clears that 24% of the respondents are fair, 26% of the respondents
are good, 22% of the respondents are excellent, 18% of the respondents are average, 10% of
the respondents are poor.
63
Table-4.24 Satisfied for the current job in the organization
1 Strongly agree 16 32
2 Agree 11 22
3 Neutral 9 18
4 Disagree 8 16
5 Strongly disagree 6 12
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is clears that 32% of the respondents are strongly agree, 18% of the
respondents are neutral, 22% of the respondents are agree , 16% of the respondents are
disagree, 12% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
64
Chart-4.24
Satisfied for the current job in the organization
32
22
18
16
12
Strongly
Agree
agree Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
From the above chart it is clears that 32% of the respondents are strongly agree, 18%
of the respondents are neutral, 22% of the respondents are agree , 16% of the respondents are
disagree, 12% of the respondents are strongly disagree.
65
Table-4.25 The rate is procedure to the recruitment process
1 Excellent 11 22
2 Good 10 20
3 Average 12 24
4 Fair 11 22
5 Poor 6 12
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above it is indicates that 24% of the respondents are average, 22% of the respondents
are fair , 22% of the respondents are excellent, 20% of the respondents are good, 12% of the
respondents are poor.
66
Chart-4.25
The rate is procedure to the recruitment process
Poor
12% Excellent
22%
Fair
22%
Good
20%
Average
24%
From the above it is indicates that 24% of the respondents are average, 22% of the respondents
are fair , 22% of the respondents are excellent, 20% of the respondents are good, 12% of the
respondents are poor.
67
Table-4.26 Selection process is enhance the job satisfaction
1 Coordination 12 24
2 Technology 8 16
3 Good Recognition 7 14
4 Salary 13 26
5 Promotion 10 20
Total 50 100
Inference:
From the above table it is shows that 24% of the respondents are coordination, 26% of the
respondents are salary, 20% of the respondents are promotion, 16% of the respondents are
technology, 14% of the respondents are good recognition.
68
Chart-4.26
Selection process is enhance the job satisfaction
24 26
20
16 14
From the above table it is shows that 24% of the respondents are coordination, 26% of
the respondents are salary, 20% of the respondents are promotion, 16% of the respondents are
technology, 14% of the respondents are good recognition.
69
Table-4.27 Different recruitment process for different grades of employment
1 Yes 24 48
2 No 26 52
Total 50 100
Inference
From the table it is indicates that 4 % of respondents are yes, 52% of respondents are no.
70
Chart-4.27
Different recruitment process for different grades of employment
48 52
Yes No
From the table it is indicates that 4 % of respondents are yes, 52% of respondents are no.
71
Table-4.28 The rate of HR practices in the company
1 Excellent 14 28
2 Good 17 34
3 Average 9 18
4 Bad 10 20
Total 50 100
Inference
From the above table it is shows that 28% of the respondents are excellent, 20% of
the respondents are bad, 18% of the respondents are average, 34% of the respondents are
good.
72
Chart-4.28
The rate of HR practices in the company
20 %
28 %
18 %
34 %
From the above table it is shows that 28% of the respondents are excellent, 20% of
the respondents are bad, 18% of the respondents are average, 34% of the respondents are
good.
73
FINDINGS
1) It is found that 22% of the respondents are below to the age group of 20-30 years.
2) It is found that 36% of the respondents are under graduate in qualification.
3) It is found that 32% of the respondents are having 3-5 years of experience.
4) It is found that 62% of the respondents agree the source of recruitment is external.
5) It is found that 54% of the respondents agree the organization offers which type of
recruitment for its employees are temporarily basis employees.
6) It is found that 64% of the respondents state the present system of recruitment in
the organization is yes.
7) It is found that 34% of the respondents state the job gives for the prestige process
in the organization are neutral.
8) It is found that 56% of the respondents agreed that HR provide adequate pool
of quality applicants.
9) It is found that 56% of the respondents are judgment test conducted during the
time of recruitment.
10) It is found that 58% of the respondents are more than 30 minutes for average time
spent by HR for candidate.
11) It is found that 64% of the respondents are not agreed that organization doing
timelines recruitment and interview process.
12) It is found that 48% of the respondents are educational qualifications verification
during the time of recruitment.
13) It is found that 28% of the respondents agree the training will be given to the
employees are recruited in the organization.
14) It is found that 38% of the respondents both vacancies are recruited by the
selection process.
15) It is found that 30% of the respondents strongly agree the recruitment plays an
important role in the organization.
16) It is found that 44% of the respondents state the placement is not good in an
organization, it leads to less productivity are neutral.
17) It is found that 34% of the respondents strongly agree for employees after should
be given correct placement.
18) It is found that 56% of respondents are agreed for referral policy in your organization.
19) It is found that 28% of the respondents disagree for right job being performed by
74
the deserve person in the organization.
20) It is found that 26% of the respondents state the overall opinion about personnel
recruitment, selection in the organization is good.
21) It is found that 32% of the respondents agree the tests are conducted at the time of
recruitment process are written test.
22) It is found that 32% of the respondents strongly agree the satisfied for the current
job in the organization.
23) It is found that 24% of the respondents agree the rate is procedure to the
recruitment process is average.
24) It is found that 26% of the respondents state the selection process is enhance the
job satisfaction are salary.
25) It is found 52% of the respondents are disagreed for different recruitment process
grades of employment in the organization.
26) It is found 34% of the respondents the rate of HR practices in the company good.
SUGGESTIONS
The company shall often conduct performance appraisal, to identify the
employee’s development.
Further the organization has to promote the employee on the basis of their
performance.
The company shall conduct more interviews for the better candidate and
freshers.
The organization must provide equal opportunities based on their performance
and experience.
The organization tries to conduct performance appraisal by appointing some
field expert from other organization or retired officers.
Performance appraisal also to be conducted every 3-5 months.
75
CONCLUSION
The present study is aimed to know the recruitment and selection process in
private sectors and also tried to know employees presentation regarding the functions of
HRM. The research selected 100 samples size of randomly. Questionnaire method is used to
collect the data. The data are analyzed using percentage from the following the hypothesis
were tested. The survey conducted that, in the ST couriers, employees, employers are
satisfied about the recruitment and selection adopted. But, in some area, they need some more
expectation.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Gatewood, R. D., & Feild, H. S. (2001). Human Resource Selection. Harcourt College
Publishers.
2. Levesque, L. L., & Whitaker, P. M. (2017). Staffing Organizations: Contemporary Practice and
Theory. McGraw-Hill Education.
[Link], W., Jr., Day, E. A., McNelly, T. L., & Edens, P. S. (2003).A Meta-Analysis of the
Criterion-Related Validity of Assessment Center Dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 125-
153.
5. Bobko, P., & Roth, P. L. (2013). Review of the Literature on the Validity of Assessment
Centers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 231-244.
6. Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2017). The Effects of Stereotype Threat on the Validity of
Selection Procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(5), 751-766.
[Link], L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2011). Personnel Selection: Looking Toward the Future—
Remembering the Past. Proceedings of the 2011 Society for Industrial and Organizational
Psychology Annual Conference.
8. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in
Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 85 Years of Research Findings.
Proceedings of the 2014 Academy of Management Annual Meeting.
[Link] for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2020). Selection and Hiring.
10. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (2020). Uniform Guidelines on
Employee Selection Procedures.
76
APPENDICES
77