ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL
PERFORMANCE, A CASE STUDY OF ENUGU ELECTRICITY
DISTRIBUTION COMPANY
BY
ONUH CHIDERA PRECIOUS
22AH/0050/BAM
A PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT, SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
AND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY, FEDERAL POLYTECHNIC
NEKEDE OWERRI, IMO STATE.
IN PARTIAL FULFUILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
AWARD OF HIGHER NATIONAL DIPLOMA (HND) IN BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT
NOVEMBER, 2024
APPROVAL PAGE
i
This project has been approved as satisfying the requirement for
the award of Higher National Diploma in Business Administration
and Management by Federal Polytechnic Nekede, Owerri.
------------------- -------------------
Dr. Obinna iwueke Date
(Project Supervisor)
------------------- -------------------
Mr. iwuoha Stanley Date
(Head of Department)
---------------------- -------------------
(External Supervisor) Date
DEDICATION
ii
This project is dedicated to God Almighty for his Agape love upon
my academics.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
iii
I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to everyone who
supported and contributed to the successful completion of this
project, [Organizational Change and Organizational Performance (a
case study of Enugu Electricity Distribution Company)].
First and foremost, I am sincerely grateful to my project supervisor,
Dr. Obinna Iwueke, whose guidance, encouragement, and
invaluable insights greatly enhanced the quality of this work. Your
unwavering support and constructive feedback at every stage of
this project were instrumental in shaping the direction of this
research.
I also extend my gratitude to the Department of Business
Administration and Management, Federal Polytechnic Nekede,
Owerri, for providing the resources and facilities necessary for
conducting this study. I am deeply appreciative of the support from
the academic and administrative staff for their assistance
throughout my study.
I would also like to acknowledge the contribution of my classmates
and friends, Ezeogo Victor, Sylvester Precious
Special thanks to my family, Mr and Mrs Onuh for their
understanding, patience, and encouragement, especially during
challenging times. Your belief in me has been my driving force.
Finally, I dedicate this project to all those who continually strive for
knowledge, and I hope that the findings of this study will be
beneficial to future researchers in this field.
Thank you all.
iv
ABSTRACT
The study on organizational change and organizational performance
with a focus on Enugu Electricity Distribution Company. The study
used a description survey design, the population of the study
consist of 300 staff of which 171 staff were from Enugu Electricity
Distribution Company, while Yaro Yemem formula was used to
determine the sample size. The research question were analyzed
with simple percentage and frequency table while the research
hypothesis were tested using simple correlation analysis by
personal 5% level of significance. The major finding of the study
were that there exist a significant relationship between
organizational change and organizational performance. It was also
concluded that if the method of introducing change is adequate,
timely and communicated to workers and stakeholders, it tends to
reduce resistance thereby leading to acceptance by majority and
this in turn facilitate effective performance by employees and
organization should identify the type and appropriate method of
change, they need to make sure it is introduced on time and
communicated to all and sundry in the organization to ensure
effective performance by Enugu Electricity Distribution Company
and improvement in the attitude of workers in the organization.
v
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title page
Approval page
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Abstract
Table of Content
CHAPTER ONE
10 Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Statement of the Problem
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.4 Research Questions
1. 5 Research Hypotheses
1.6 Significance of the Study
1.7 Scope of the Study.
18 Limitations of the study
vi
1.9 Definition of term
CHAFTERTWO
2.0 Literature Review.
2.1 Conceptual Literature
2.2 Theoretical Literature
2.3 Empirical Literature
2.4 Researcher's Position.
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Research Methodology
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Research Design
2.3 Sources of Data
3.4 Population and Sample Size determination
3.5 Sample Technique
3.6 Method of Data collection
3.7 Validity and Reliability of measurement instruments
3.8 Techniques of Data Analysis
vii
CHATTER FOUR
4.0 Data Analysis, Presentation and Interpretation
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Data Presentation
4.3 Data Analysis
4.4Test of Hypotheses
4.4 Interpretation of Result
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Summary of Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendations
5.1 Summary of Findings
5.2 Conclusion
5.3 Recommendation
Bibliography
Appendix
Questionnaire
viii
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background Of The Study
Organizational change is an important issue in organization. It is
actually a process in which an organization optimizes performance
as it works towards its ideal state. Organizational change occurs as
a reaction to an ever changing environment, a response to a
current crisis, situation or is triggered by a leader.
Organizational performance refers to how well an organization
achieves its goals and objectives. It encompasses various aspects
including efficiency, effectiveness and productively. Key indicators
of organizational performance include financial metric, employee
satisfaction, customer satisfaction and over all operational success.
Successful organization change is not merely a process to
adjustment but also requires sufficient managing capabilities.
However, there are many topics to be considered to achieve
successful change. Also, organizational change can significantly
influence performance by enhancing efficiency, fostering
ix
innovation, boosting employee morale and productivity, providing
competitive advantages and managing risks effectively. Hence this
report discusses the causes of organizational change, its elements,
approaches, process resistance management and the possible
factors leading to its breakdown.
All the things in this temporarily existing world changes, nothing
remain static forever, even the world itself. (Rescher, 1996) there
are many challenges that organizations face in dynamic
environment, but the most important is change, which changes the
way of doing things in the workspace.
Organizational change is explained as an alternator of an
organization’s environment, structure, culture technology or people
(Michael grandall, 2006). Organizations can either enter or exists
from the market by accepting and rejecting change.
Organizational change is a planned and integrated effort to improve
the effectiveness of an organization through the restructure of its
process on the basis of behavioral science, knowledge (primarily,
sociology and psychologically) organizational changes can be
initiated deliberately by managers. It can evolve within
x
a department. It can also be imposed by specific changes in policy
or procedure or it can arise from external pressures.
In organization, change may have high or low impact, a good
example of high impact changes is when there is a major re-
organization which in turn affects the entire organization, while an
example of low impact change is where a few people are
transferred from one sector to another.
Change is inevitable in any organization, because business operate
in a dynamic environment which implies changes. An organization
that fails to recognize the inevitability of change is doomed for
failure the management that succeed is one that is constantly
adopting the direction and the operation of its enterprise to change
in technological, social, political and economic in which its operates
Brief History of Enugu Electricity Distribution Company
The Enugu electricity distribution company (EEDC) was officially
established on November 2013, following the privatization of the
power holding company of Nigeria (PHCN) the privatization was part
of a broader initiative by the Nigeria government to improve the
sector’s efficiency and service quality. Before its privatization,
xi
power sector in Nigeria was managed by (PHCN) which struggled
with issues, such as inadequate infrastructure, power maintenance
and inefficiency in services delivery, the government privatization
efforts aimed to address this problems by dividing the sector into
generation, transmission and distribution segments with private
companies taking over the distribution aspects.
EEDC was one of the successor companies to PHCN and was
awarded the license to distributed electricity in south eastern states
such as Enugu, Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi and Imo. Since its
establishment, EEDC has focused on improving power supply
reliability, customer services and infrastructure within its franchise
area. The company has undertaking various projects to modernize
its network, enhance mastery system and reduce technical and
commercial loses.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Several research studies have dealt with issues of organizational
change and performance, but not withstanding there exist problems
arising from change which may have affected the performance of
organization (EEDC) among these some of the problems that made
xii
the researcher to embark on the study, the method of introducing
change, the nature and magnitude of the change, the timing of the
change the organizational awareness of the change, the effect of
change on organizational performance and the resistance to change
by workers in organizations. (Enugu Electricity Distribution
Company. EEEDC)
1.3 Objectives of the Study
Specific objectives are:
1. To determine the effect of introducing change on
organizational productivity.
2. To determine how change process affect re-execution of
tasks.
3. To ascertain the relationship between types of change and
attainment of objectives
4. To find the relationship between change technique and
competition
1.4 Significance of the Study
xiii
In view of this research work the beneficiaries are as follows;
management, government, organization and students
The management of EEDC might use or apply the result of this
study in managing their own business effectively.
The policy making arm of government appreciate the work and
therefore be more considerate on the type of policies they may
introduce.
It will help organization achieve better customer satisfaction and
these increase sales, volume and performance by adapting to
changed in their organization. Finally, its provides information for
students and scholars for future research and expansion of
knowledge gap.
1.4 Research Questions
The following research questions guided this study
1. What is the relationship between change process and
productivity?
2. How does changes process affect the execution of tasks?
3. How do types of change affect the attainment of objectives?
xiv
4. What is the relationship between change technique and
organization
1.5 Research Hypotheses
The following research hypotheses were formulated for the study.
HO1: Change process has significant relationship with employee
productivity HO1: change process does not have significant
relationship with employee productivity
HO2: There is no significant relationship between change process
and execution of tasks
HO2: There is no significant relationship between change process
and the execution of tasks.
1.6 Scope of the Study
This study on the relationship between organizational change and
performance will be concentrated on employees of all cadres in
Enugu Electricity Distribution Company.
1.7 Limitations of the Study
xv
There are constraints encountered by the research while carrying
out the research work. They include
Time: Time was a major limited factor considering the little time
frame for the semester
Attitude of Respondents: the respondents who thought that the
research is out to take undue advantage of their business
information, even when told it was far academic purpose posed a
problem
Finance: money is also a serious impediment due to the numerous
trip that has to be embarked on for the purpose of this research
work.
1.7 Definition of Terms
Organizational change is an organization going through a
transformation. Organizational change occurs when business
strategies or major sections of an organizational are altered, Also
known as reorganization, restructuring and turnaround.
xvi
Organizational performance refers to how well an organization
achieve its goals and objectives, it encompasses various aspects
including efficiency, effectiveness, productivity and organizational
performance.
CHAPTER TWO
2. 0 Literature Review
2.1 Conceptual Literature
2.1.1 The Concept of Change
xvii
Change has become the norm in most organization, plant closing,
business failure, mergers and acquisitions and downsizing have
become experience to organization globally. Unfortunately, the
world surrounding the organization is nowhere near as stable. In
other word, change happens. Change, according to Peter Drucker,
is a deliberate adaption of organizational processes and structures
to remain relevant in a dynamic environment. Francis and Sinclair
view change as a continuous social reconstruction, involving shifts
in shared meanings over time. Vando Van and Poole define it as the
empirical observation of differences in state, quality or form with an
entity, such as person’s role or organizational strategy. Victor Hugo,
as quoted by Cameron Conaway, emphasizes that change involves
evolving while preserving essential values, reflected in the phrase,
“Change your leaves, and keep intact your leaves” Karx Lewin
explains change through stages; unfreezing old patterns,
implementing new behaviors and unfreezing them to ensure
stability.
2.1.2 Types of Change
There are two basic forms of change in organization:
Planned Change: This occurs when a change in an organization is
anticipated and allows for advance preparation. So, it is a deliberate
decision to alter the organization. Organizations that wish to move
from a traditional hierarchical structure to one that facilitates self-
managed teams must use a proactive carefully orchestrated
approach. However, not all change is planned.
xviii
Unplanned Change: is a change that is ongoing or happens so
quickly and at times unforeseen. It is a dynamic in nature. Changes
in government regulation, changes in the economy and technology,
for example are often unplanned. Responsiveness to unplanned
change requires tremendous flexibility and adaptability on the part
of the organizations. The change managers must contend with its
dynamic change which determines the continuous existence of the
organization, rather than a discreet event as with planned change.
2.1.3 The Scope of Change
The scope of change refers to how extensive and impact a
modification is within an organization, system or individual. It
defines the areas processes or rules affected and help with effective
planning and management. Changes can range from small
adjustments, like updating policies, to major transformation, such
as restructuring an organization. The timeframe may be a short-
term or long-term, involving various stakeholders like employees or
customers. Successful change requires proper resources, such as
technology or training, and aims to achieve goals like improving
efficiency or meeting regulations. Identifying risks such as
employee resistance ensures smooth transitions.
In summary, understanding the scope of change helps allocate
resources efficiently and ensures everyone involved is prepared for
the transition.
2.1.4 The Role of Change Agent
xix
The individual or groups that undertake the task off introducing and
managing a change in organization is known as the change agent.
Change agents can be internal, such as managers or employees
who are appointed to oversee the change process. In some
organization like EEDC managers and employees alike are
developing the needed skills to produce change and innovating in
the organization. Change agents can also be external, such as
outside consultants.
Internal change agents have certain advantages in managing the
change process. They know the organizations past history, its
political system and its culture; internal change agents are likely to
be careful about managing change. There are disadvantages,
however, to using internal change agents, they may be associated
with certain factions within the organization and may easily be
accused of favoritism.
External change agents bring an outsider’s objective view to the
organization. They may be preferred by employees because of their
impartiality. External change agents face certain problems,
however, not only are their knowledge of the organization’s history
limited, but may also be viewed with suspicion by organization
members. External change agents have more power in directing
changed as being trustworthy credible and possessing important
expertise.
2.1.5 The Process of Change in Organizations
xx
Organizations tend to respond to change process by continuing to
do what they are good at. Change processes such s business
process, re-engineering cannot ensure the success of change. The
people aspects of change are the most critically important for
successful transformations. Even Michael Hammer, who launched
the reengineering movement, admits that he forgot about the
“ocibke aspects” of change. “I was insufficiently appreciative of the
human dimension. I have learned that it is critical” if people are not
taken into account, a change process will be negatively affected or
may even fail.
The challenge of managing the change process involves harnessing
the energy of diverse individuals who hold a variety of views to
change.
2.1.6 Causes of Resistance to Change
Some of the major reasons for resistance to change include:
Fear of Unknown: Employees fearing technological change such
as introduction of a new computer system may resist the change
simply because it introduces ambiguity into what was once a
comfortable situation for them.
Fear of the unknown, when a change is impending some may fear
losing their status because of change.
Uncertainty: Result from fear of the unknown and lack of
information about the future. It can be threatening when
xxi
employees’ fears are based on negative consequences of previous
changes in the organization.
Different Perspectives and Goals: A proposed change may be
viewed through different lenses by employees with differing goals
and perspectives.
Cultures that value tradition: Some organizational cultures are
not supportive of change, valuing tradition and customary ways of
doing things instead.
2.1.7 Tactics of Introducing Change
The tactics for bringing about change in an organization include:
i. Communication and Education: One way to overcome
resistance to change is to educate employees about why the
change is needed. Information should flow in both directions.
The individuals change in a change should become aware of
why people fear the change and provide information that
eliminates some of the uncertainty.
ii. Employees Involvement: Involving potential resistors in the
design and implementation of change can often help diffuse
resistance.
iii. Negotiation: Include making concessions and given
resources or rewards to resistors in exchange for their
cooperation, individuals who have negative attitude towards a
change may be given opportunity to take early retirement or
transfer elsewhere.
xxii
iv. Coercion: Confronting and forcing resisting employees to
change is the use of coercion. Coercion may be necessary in a
crisis, when speed is essential or changes will not be popular.
v. Top-Management Support: helps discourage resistance
because it shows that the change is important. Change can
require the collaborations, of several organization units or
departments, and some units may fare better than others,
creating the potential for conflict over resources. In such case,
top management support can facilitate cooperation.
2.2 Theoretical Literature
Forced-Field Analysis
The force-field analysis model of change developed Kurt Lewin,
states that two sets of opposing forces at equilibrium before a
change takes place. The force consists of driving forces, which are
opposed to change. When two forces are evenly balanced, the
organization is in status quo state and does not change.
To implement change, the force-field model of change suggests
that management can choose from one of the three change
strategies. Management can increase the driving forces that drive
the change relative to the restraining forces; reduce the restraining
forces that oppose the change, relative to the driving forces or
both.
THE THREE STEPS MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
xxiii
Kurt Lewin, a noted social psychologist, also developed the three
step model of organizational change. The three steps are
unfreezing, change and refreezing
Unfreezing involves melting resistance to change by dealing with
people’s fears and anxieties so that they can be more open to
change.
The second step is to change itself, which is a departure from the
status quo. Change can involves technology, people, products
services or management policies or administration.
The final step is refreezing in which new management practices
values and employees’ behavior are established as part of
employees’ new routines. Coaching, training and adapting
appropriate reward systems facilitate the refreezing step.
2.3 Empirical Literature
The purpose for carrying out an empirical study is to investing how
change efforts influence performance outcomes in organizations,
particularly within EEDC. Below is a detailed outline:
1. Concept of Organizational Change: Change includes
planned or unplanned shifts in structure, technology,
processes and policies.
Lewin’s change model and Kotter’s Eight-step change model
often guide such studies.
xxiv
Empirical works suggest successful change depends on
leadership involvement, communication, and a change
friendly organizational culture (Burnes, 2004).
2. Impact of organizational change on performance is often
measured by operational efficiency, financial gains, customer
satisfaction, and employee morale. Armenakis and Bedeian
1999, show that poorly managed changed can lead to
resistance, stress and performance decline, while well-
managed ones improve productivity.
3. Empirical Evidence from the Energy Sector: Utilities like
EEDC face sector specific challenges, regularly reforms,
privatization, and service delivery expectations.
Research on Nigeria’s electricity reforms (Eberhard, Godinho,
2017) highlighted how companies often encounter
performance bottlenecks but see improvement with time and
strategies realignment.
4. Leadership and Change Management in EEDC: Leaders
play a critical role in steering change through strategies vision,
motivation, and managing resistance. For EEDC, leadership
effectiveness in communication and stakeholder engagement
is key especially with power distribution reforms and customer
demands for better services. Change management models
applied empirically in energy companies, like EEDC; suggest a
need for gradual cultural shifts to achieve performance
improvements.
xxv
5. Challenges of change in EEDC: Privatization and
deregulation in Nigeria’s power sector have introduced
challenged such as funding gaps, obsolete infrastructure, and
customer dissatisfaction.
Empirical studies emphasize the importance of employee
training, process automation, and performance management
systems in improving services quality.
6. Research Gaps and Justification for Study: This study
aims to contribute empirical findings relevant to EEDC by
exploring the link between the company’s change initiative
and their performance outcomes.
xxvi
2.5 Researcher’s Position
Given the conceptual nature of this study, review of relevant
literature and conceptual model presented for future empirical
study.
This study posits that effective organizational change strategies
significantly enhance performance metrics within Enugu Electricity
Distribution Company (EEDC). By employing robust change
management frameworks, EEDC can address operational
inefficiencies, improve employee engagement, and elevate
customer satisfaction.
The findings indicate that the alignment of change initiatives with
organizational goals fosters a cultural of adaptability and resilience
ultimately leading to sustainable performance improvements. Thus,
successful navigation of change processes is critical for EEDC to
thrive in a competitive and evolving energy sector.
xxvii
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
This chapter contains the following sub-sections: research design,
source of data, population and sample size, sampling technique,
instrument of data collection, validity and reliability and method of
data analysis.
3.2 Research Design Method
The research made use of descriptive method. The design helps the
researcher get the opinions of the respondents through
questionnaire and interviews.
3.2 Sources of Data
The researcher made use of both primary and secondary data
collection to enable her carryout the research work completely.
Primary source; these are a firsthand information collected in the
fields, specifically from the respondents for the topic at hand
xxviii
through questionnaire, interviews and observation
Secondary source: these are already existing data but are relevant
to the study. They are collected from books journals and other
people work to help the researcher in carrying her work and to
reduce cost.
3.4 Population of the Study
The population of the study consisted of 300 employees in Enugu
state, the staff is made up of top managers, middle managers and
lower managers.
Employees Score
S/ Firm Top Middle Lower Total
N
1 Enugu Electrical 65 95 140 300
Distribution
Company
Total 65 95 140 300
Source: Field survey, 2024
In determining the sample size, the researcher use the entire
population of 300staff and the Yaro Yamen’s formula was used for
the determination which is stated thus.
N
n=1+N (e)2
Where n=sample size
N= population of study
xxix
e2= error provision =0.03
Therefore we have
n = 300
1+300(0.0025)
n = 300
1+0.75
n = 300
1.75
n = 171
This entails that 171 respondents will be used in the study.
3.5 Sampling Techniques
Similarly, the technique used for sampling is the simple random
sampling technique. This is because, it ensures that every member
of the population has equal chance of being selected and it is easy
to understand.
3.6 Instrument of Data Collection
The researcher used questionnaire because it is a major instrument
of data collection in survey design. The researcher also made use of
oral interview schedule with open ended questionnaire.
3.7 Validity and Reliability of the Instrument
xxx
For content validation, the questionnaire was given to panel of
experts drawn from the Enugu Electrical Distribution Company,
where suggestions helped to modify the questionnaire. Thereafter,
the questionnaire was taken to the researcher’s supervisor who
modified it as necessary. The questionnaire was also pilot tested.
The pilot testing involved the administration of the instrument to a
random scale of EEDC and profit making organization that is outside
Enugu metropolis. This aided modification of the research
questionnaire making it clear and unambiguous to the actual
respondent
3.8 Method of Data Analysis
The researcher made use of simple percentage and tables to
analyze the questionnaire and oral interviews items, while
statistical tool (T-test) was used to test the hypothesis.
The formula for sample percentage is stated as:
Percentage (%) =F X 100
N 1
Where, F = number of respondent
N = total number of responses
The statistical tool used to analyze the data generated from
questionnaire was the simple correlation analysis by Pearson.
xxxi
n ƹxy−ƹxƹy
r = √ ¿ ¿ -( ƹ x)2(n ƹy2-( ƹy ¿2)
2
Decision rule: basically, null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected when the
0
calculated result (t) is greater than the tabulated result (t 2 v) and
vice-verse
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 Data Presentation, Analysis Interpretation
4.1 Introduction
In this chapter the research presented, analyzed and interpreted
the data collected which provided as state earlier in the last
chapter. Statistical tables were used in the analysis which were
appropriately numbered and titled to show exactly what is being
analyzed and objective interpretation of data displayed in the table
for clear result.
4.2 Presentation of the Data
xxxii
The method adopted by the researcher involved detailed and
careful analysis of the available data and were presented using
simple percentage.
4.3 Analysis of Data
In analyzing the data, the information showed that there were
different opinions or observations from workers of Enugu Electrical
Distribution Company. The sample size calculated result was 171,
but 165 was respondent were used for the analysis. The difference
is as a result of the administered questionnaires that were not
returned or not properly filled by the respondents
Questionnai Number Percentage Percentage
re returned not returned
administere returned
d
171 165 3.5% 96.5%
Question: there is a relationship between organizational change and
performance
Table 4.3.1 Organizational Change and Performance
Option Respondents Percentage (%)
Strongly agree 65 39.4
Agree 30 30.3
xxxiii
Neutral - -
Disagree 20 12.1
Strongly Disagree 30 18.2
Total 165 100
Source: field survey, 2024
Table 4.3.1 shows that 65 respondents representing 39.4% strongly
agreed that there is a relationship between organizational change
and performance, so respondents representing 30.3% agreed to
that while 20 respondents representing 12.1% disagreed to that; 30
respondents representing 18.2%strongly disagreed to that and
none of the respondents were neutral
From the analysis, it shows that majority agreed that there is a
relationship between organizational change and performance.
Question 2: Organizational change affects performance by
improving worker’s productivity.
Table 4.3.2 Organizational change affects performance by
improving worker’s productivity
Option Respondents Percentage (%)
Strongly agree 70 42.4
Agree 30 18.2
Neutral - -
Disagree 30 18.2
xxxiv
Strongly Disagree 35 21.2
Total 165 100
Source: field survey, 2024
Table 4.3.2 show that 70 respondents representing 42.4% strongly
agreed that organizational change affect performance by improving
workers’ productivity; 30 respondents representing 18.2% agreed
to that, while 30respondent representing 18.2%disagree to that; 35
respondents representing 21.2% strongly disagree to that and none
of the respondents were neutral .
From the analysis, It shows that majority of the respondent agreed
that organizational change affect performance by improving
worker’s productivity.
Question 3: Changes in organization can affect workers attitude
Table 4.3.3 Organizational change and workers attitude
Option Respondents Percentage (%)
Strongly agree 80 48.5
Agree 40 24.2
Neutral - -
Disagree 25 15.2
Strongly Disagree 20 12.1
Total 165 100
Source: field survey, 2024
xxxv
Table 4.3.3: shows that 80 respondents representing 48.5%
response strongly agreed that changes in organization can affect
worker attitude 40 respondents representing 24.3% agreed to that;
while 25 respondents representing 15.2% strongly disagreed to that
20 respondents representing 12.1% strongly to that and none of the
respondent were neutral. From the analysis, it shows that majority
agreed that timing change affect worker performance in the
organization
Question 5: Communication of change enhances worker attitude to
increase performance
xxxvi
Table 4.3.5 Communication of Change And Worker Attitude
Option Respondents Percentage (%)
Strongly agree 70 42.4
Agree 50 30.3
Neutral - -
Disagree 20 12.1
Strongly Disagree 20 12.1
Total 165 100
Source: field survey, 2024
Table 4.3.5 show that 70 respondents representing 42.4% strongly
agreed that communication of change enhances worker attitude to
increase performance, 50 respondent representing 30.3% agreed to
that while 20 respondent representing 12.1% representing
disagreed to that 25 respondent, representing 15.2% strongly
disagreed to that, none of the respondent were neutral. From the
analysis, it shown that majority of the respondent agreed that
communication of change enhance worker attitude to increase
Performance.
QUESTION 6: Awareness of Change In The Organization Tend To
Reduce Worker Resistance
xxxvii
Table 4.3.6 Awareness of Change worker Resistance
Option Respondents Percentage (%)
Strongly agree 69 41.3
Agree 66 40
Neutral - -
Disagree 30 18.1
Strongly Disagree 20 -
Total 165 100
Source: field survey 2024
Table 4.3.6 show that 69 respondent representing 41.5% strongly
agreed that awareness of change in the organizational tend to
reduce worker resistance, 60 respondent representing 40% agreed
to that while 30 respondent representing 18.2% disagreed to that
none of the respondent strongly to that; none of the respondents
strongly disagreed and none from the analysis it shows that major
agreed that awareness of changes in the organizational trend to
reduce worker
Question 7: There are challenges involve in achieving that
awareness of change in the organization tend to reduce
Option Respondents Percentage (%)
Strongly agree 92 55.8
xxxviii
Agree 73 44.2
Neutral - -
Disagree -
Strongly Disagree 20 12.1
Total 165 100
Source: field survey 2024
Table 4.3.7 show that 69 respondent representing 41.5% strongly
agreed that there are challenges in achieving change by EEDC, 73
respondent representing 44.20% agreed to that while none of the
respondents disagree, strongly disagreed and none were neutral.
From the analysis it shows that major agreed that all agreed that
challenge involve in achieving changes by EEDC
Question 8: Internal and external force are the major are the major
reason for resistance that challenge
Table 4.3.8 Forces and resistance to change
Option Respondents Percentage (%)
Strongly agree 100 60.5
Agree 65 39.4
Neutral - -
Disagree -
Strongly Disagree 20 12.1
Total 165 100
Source: field survey 2024
xxxix
Table 4.3.8 show that 100 respondent representing 60.6%
respondent strongly agreed that internal and external force are the
major are the major reason for resistance that change, 65
respondent representing 39.4% agreed to that while none of the
respondents disagree, strongly disagreed and none were neutral.
From the analysis, it shows that majority agreed that internal and
external force are the major reason for resistance that change.
Question 9: Organizational high performance depend on the
method used in introducing change
Table 4.3.9 Organizational high performance depends on the
method used in introducing change
Option Respondents Percentage (%)
Strongly agree 88 53.3
Agree 32 19.4
Neutral - -
Disagree 27 16.4
Strongly Disagree 18 10.9
Total 165 100
Source: field survey 2024
Table 4.3.10 show that 88 respondent representing 53.3% strongly
agreed that organizational high performance depend on the method
used in introducing change, 32 respondent representing 19.4 %
xl
agreed to that while 24 respondent representing 16.4% disagreed
to that18respondent representing 10.9% strongly disagreed and
none were neutral. From the analysis it shows that major majority
agreed that organizational high performance depend on the method
used in introducing change.
Question 10: High impact changes enhance attainment of
organizational goal and objective.
Table 4.3.10 High Impact Change Enhance Attainment Of
Organizational Goal And Objective.
Option Respondents Percentage (%)
Strongly agree 20 12
Agree 25 15.2
Neutral - -
Disagree 28 47.3
Strongly Disagree 42 25.5
Total 165 100
Source: field survey 2024
Table 4.3.10 show that 20 respondent representing 12% respond
strongly agreed that high impact change enhance attainment of
organizational goal and objective., 25 respondent representing
15.2 % agreed to that, while 28 respondent representing 47.3%
disagreed to that, 42 respondent representing 25.5% strongly
xli
disagreed and none were neutral. From the analysis it shows that
high impact change enhance attainment of organizational goal and
objective.
nϵxy−ϵxzy
r = √¿¿¿
6(28615) – (663) (325)
r =√ 81275− ( 665 )2 (6(25175)−( 325 ) 2¿)¿
171690 - 216125
r =√ ¿ ¿ ¿
-44435
r= √(45425¿¿ )(45425)¿
-44435
r= √ 206340625
−44435
= 45425
r = 0.98
t- cal =
√
r n−2
¿¿ 1−r 2
= -0.98
√
❑ 6−2
¿¿ 1−(−0.98)2
xlii
= -0.98
√
❑ 4
¿¿ 1−0.396
= 0.98 √ 101.010101
= -9.849
=∞=5 %=0.05
Decision Rule: We shall reject the if – lead < - + - table ∞ t /2 , v
0.05
t ∞ /2 , v ¿=t n=2
2
= t0.025, 6-2
= t0.025, 6-2
= t0.625, 4 = -2.776
Decision: Since teal (-9.349) is less than the table value (-2.276),
we reject the null hypothesis and hence calculate thus:
Using the simple correlation Analysis
X Y Xy X2 Y2
3 120 45 5,400 14400 2025
5 120 45 5400 14400 2025
6 135 30 43 4380 18,225
8 165 0 0 27225 0
10 165 0 0 22325 0
12 125 40 3,000 15625 1600
830 160 20180 117100 6550
Hypothesis Two
HO: Change processes have significant relationship with employee
productivity
xliii
H1: Change process does not have significant relationship with
employee productivity
nϵxy−ϵxϵy
r = √¿¿¿
6(201808) – ( 830 ) (160)
r = √6 ¿¿¿
12020 - 132800
r = √ 2022600❑ – 688900 ( 39300 )−(25600¿)¿
-11720
r = √ ( 13700 ) (13700)
-11720
r = √ 187690000
-44455
r = √ 13700
r = 0.86
t – cal r ❑
√ n−r
¿¿ r −r 2
=
√
❑ 6−2
¿¿ 1−(−0.86)2
=
√
❑ 4
¿¿ 1−0.7596
=√ 15.360983
xliv
= -0.86 (3.919309008)
t = -3.371
=∞=6 %=6.05
Decision Rule: Since teak (-3.371) is less than the table ratio (-
2.776) we reject the null hypothesis and hence conclude that
change in process have significantly relationship with employee
productivity.
4.4 Interpretation of the Data
From the research questions, it was observed that majority of
respondents agreed that organizational change affects performance
by increasing workers productivity.
Also the result of the hypothesis hosted gave research question,
answers that there is significant relationship between change
process and exchange tasks.
According Judges and Doughlas and also less in their empirical work
in organizational change and performance (EEDC) revealed that
there is a strong positive relationship.
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Summary of Findings, Conclusion and Recommendation
5.1 Summary of Findings
The study has revealed the following:
i. Organizational change has a significant impact on the
performance of EDDC, thereby leading to attainment of
organizational success, goal and objective
xlv
ii. Organizational change has significant affection employee
productivity, thereby leading to increase in performance as
well as reduction on the change resistance
iii. Internal and external force are the major reason for
resistance to change as a result of the negative or positive
affect it plays on worker productivities
5.2 Conclusion
Since change is inevitable and inescapable and part of our social
and organizational lives. This means organizational change is
basically needed to enhance organization performance (EDDC), but
when the method of introducing change is inadequate, it will lead to
ineffectiveness organizational failure, inefficiency and low
performance of employee and the organization in general.
When chance is timely, with an appropriate method and it is being
communication to employees in the organization it tends to reduce
resistance and read to acceptance by majority and this facilitate
effective performance of employee and the organization in general.
5.3 Recommendation
xlvi
Based on finding of this study, the following are recommended for
organizations
i. Ensure that they identify the type of method of change that is
appropriate for their organization, exploit them and use them
in enhancing their organization performance
ii. Since change has a persuasive influence organization should
be very careful when making right type and method of
introducing change is not implemented, its whole essence will
be defeated, thereby leading to disaster and organizational
change failure
iii. Ensure change is not introduced for its mere purpose but for
effective and efficient result that will be lead to improving the
overall performance in the organization and competitive
standing of other
iv. Ensure change in introduced gradually, one step at a time, one
after the other and the right change of the right time
v. Effective communication, which is indicating that something
needs to be changed or altered, this, if not timely or done at
the right time that change is needed, the whole essence will
be defeated.
xlvii
vi. Organizations should always identity new ways of doing things
in order to move in line with the changing trends in business
environment. this is because, an organization that succeeds is
one that is constantly adopting the operation and direction of
its enterprise to changes in technological, social, political and
economic environment in which it operates.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alkanna, 0.4 (1998): Organizational Behavior and Human relation
Management, Owerri Konotte Press Ltd
Anna, M. Owoh (2007): Organizational Behavior Owerri, Venture
Enugu.
Iwueke Obinna, C. Organizational Behavior, Owerri Add More Prints
Concapts.
xlviii
Masom, H. (1970) Psychology in Management, Condon McGraw Hill
Company
Microsoft Encerta (2006). Development Economics Red Mould, H.D
Microsoft Corporation.
Nwaeketo C. C (2006) Fundamentals of small scale Industry
Management in Nigeria, Owerri, Bill Fred. Nig Ltd
Nwokore, M. G. (1981)! Modern Marketing for Nigeria Macmillan
Pressing Ltd, London and Basing Stech.
Okonkwo (2008) Development Administration an Managemant of
Development, Abakilila, Ugubis Printin and Publishing [Link].
Onnualah, S. L. C (1999): Entrepreneurship in Small Business Firms.
Ikeja G-May Investment Ltd
Ugiagbe M. and Nwaneri C. (2013): Management Change and
Development, Owerri Favoured Publishers.
Business Administration and
Management ,
School of Business and
Management Technology,
Federal Polytechnic Nekede,
P.M.B 1036 Owerri,
Imo State.
Dear Respondent,
xlix
APPLICATION FOR COMPLETION OF RESEMACH
QUESTIONNAIRE
I am a final year student of the above named institution. I am
currently conducting a research on the topic "Organizational
Change and Organizational Performance, A Case Study of Enugu
Electricity Distribution Company".
Kindly assist I by completing this questionnaire, the exercise is
purely academic and the information supplied would be used or
treated with strict compliance counting on your cooperation.
Thanks in anticipation.
Yours Faithfully,
Onuh Chidera
Precious
QUESTIONNAIRE
The questionnaire sample used is therefore presented thus:
Section A
Please tick [√ ] inside the appropriately
1. AGE BRACKET
a. 18 -25 years
l
b. 26 – 35 years
c. 36 – 45 years
d. 46 – above
2. LEVEL OF EDUCATION
a. FSLC
b. WAEC/SSCE
c. OND/NCE
d. HND/DEGREE
3. LENGTH OF SEPIUTCE
a. One years
b. Two years
c. Three years
d. Above
SECTION B
S/ QUESTION SA A N D SD
N
1 There is a relationship organizational
change and performance of profit
making organization in Nigeria
2 Organizational change affect
performance by improving workers
productivity
3 Changes in any organization can affect
li
worker attitude
4 Timing of change affect workers
performance in the organizations.
5 Communication of change enhances
worker attitude to increase
performance
6 Awareness of change in the
organization tend to reduce
7 There are challenges involve in
achieving charge by profit making
organizations
8 Internal and external forces are the
major reason foe resistance to change
9 Organizations high performance
depends on the method used in
introducing change
10 Change has negative and positive
effect on worker attitude
11 High impact change enhance
attainment of organizational goals and
objectives
12 Effective turning and implementation
of change enhance workers attitude to
increase performance
lii