CHAPTER 2

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.0 INTRODUCTION

Refugee management has been a significant area of research in humanitarian and development
sectors, primarily aimed at providing effective solutions for displaced populations and ensuring
their integration into host communities. The academic literature on refugee management is
extensive and diverse, covering topics such as refugee camp administration, policy frameworks,
humanitarian aid effectiveness, and long-term resettlement strategies.

This literature review synthesizes key studies that highlight the main themes and debates in the
field. The primary areas explored include the structure of refugee management programs, their
social and economic impact, the effectiveness of humanitarian aid in improving the livelihoods
of refugees, and emerging research methodologies in the sector.

Jacobsen (2005) provides a comprehensive analysis of refugee camp management, addressing

key challenges such as resource allocation, security, and policy implementation. Her study offers
insights into various strategies adopted by organizations to ensure the safety and well-being of
displaced populations. Additionally, Crisp (2018) examines the evolution of global refugee
policies and the role of international organizations in managing large-scale displacement,
revealing a shift toward long-term integration strategies rather than temporary aid solutions.

More recent research, such as that by Betts et al. (2021), explores the economic inclusion of
refugees and the role of host countries in creating sustainable livelihoods. Their findings
emphasize the transition from short-term relief to self-reliance programs that focus on skills
development, employment opportunities, and community participation. Their research highlights
the increasing use of data-driven approaches to assess the effectiveness of refugee integration
policies.

Furthermore, Bakewell (2019) investigates the impact of refugee policies on host communities,
arguing that successful refugee programs depend not only on aid distribution but also on
fostering positive relations between refugees and host populations. This perspective is critical in
understanding how governments and organizations can develop inclusive strategies that benefit
both refugees and their host societies.

This review systematically analyzes these themes and provides a clear synthesis of the refugee
management literature. By reflecting on past studies and identifying emerging research areas, it
contributes to the broader understanding of how refugee management continues to evolve as a
tool for social and economic development. As the needs of displaced populations change,
refugee support systems must also adapt to address new challenges effectively.

2.1 Theoretical and Conceptual Development of Refugee Management

Refugee management is a multidisciplinary field that integrates theories from sociology, political
science, international relations, human rights, and public administration to address the complex
realities of forced migration. The concept of refugee management involves understanding the
causes, experiences, and solutions associated with refugees—individuals who are compelled to
leave their home countries due to persecution, conflict, violence, or human rights violations.

The theoretical and conceptual development of refugee management has evolved significantly
over the decades, driven by global migration trends, humanitarian crises, and international legal
frameworks. Historically, refugee management theories were grounded in the need for protection
and assistance, emphasizing immediate relief and asylum provisions. Over time, the field has
expanded to include comprehensive approaches that consider long-term integration,
development, and durable solutions.
At the heart of refugee management theories is the principle of protection, as enshrined in the
1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol. This legal framework established the rights of
refugees and the obligations of host countries, laying the foundation for subsequent theoretical
developments. Scholars and practitioners have since built on this foundation to develop more
nuanced understandings of refugees’ needs, integrating concepts such as human security, social
justice, and resilience.

One of the key theoretical approaches in refugee management is the push-pull model, which
examines the factors driving refugees to leave their countries (push factors) and the attractions of
host countries (pull factors). Push factors typically include conflict, persecution, and economic
hardship, while pull factors encompass safety, employment opportunities, and access to social
services. Understanding these factors is crucial for effective refugee management, as it informs
policies aimed at both preventing displacement and facilitating integration.

Another significant theoretical contribution is the protracted refugee situation (PRS) framework,
which addresses the long-term displacement of refugees who remain in host countries for
extended periods without resolution. PRS theories highlight the importance of sustainable
livelihoods, social cohesion, and access to education and healthcare in managing refugee
populations. This approach calls for a shift from temporary aid to more durable solutions,
including local integration, resettlement, and voluntary repatriation.

The concept of human security has also influenced refugee management theories. This approach
broadens the traditional security paradigm by focusing on individual safety and well-being rather
than state-centric security concerns. Human security emphasizes protecting refugees from
violence, ensuring access to basic needs, and empowering them to participate in host
communities. This shift has led to more holistic refugee policies that go beyond immediate
protection to include development and self-reliance.

Social capital theory plays a pivotal role in understanding refugee integration and community
dynamics. Social capital refers to the networks, relationships, and social norms that facilitate
cooperation and support within communities. For refugees, social capital is critical in accessing
resources, finding employment, and integrating into host societies. Policies that strengthen social
capital—through community engagement, language programs, and social services—are essential
for effective refugee management.

The concept of resilience has gained prominence in recent years, both as a theoretical and
practical approach in refugee management. Resilience theory focuses on the capacity of refugees
and host communities to adapt, recover, and thrive despite adversity. This perspective
encourages policies that enhance refugees’ coping mechanisms, such as education, economic
participation, and social networks, while also supporting host communities to manage the social
and economic impacts of refugee influxes.

International relations theories, particularly constructivism and liberalism, offer insights into the
global dimensions of refugee management. Constructivism emphasizes the role of ideas, norms,
and identities in shaping state behavior and international cooperation. This theory helps explain
how states perceive refugees and their responsibilities, influencing international refugee policies.
Liberalism, with its focus on human rights and international cooperation, underpins the global
refugee regime, advocating for shared responsibility among nations to address refugee crises.

The humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence are central
to refugee management practices. These principles guide organizations such as the United
Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and non-governmental organizations
(NGOs) in delivering aid and protection to refugees. The theoretical grounding of
humanitarianism stresses the importance of upholding human dignity and providing assistance
without discrimination, which remains a cornerstone of refugee management.

Development theories have also been integrated into refugee management, particularly in
contexts where displacement becomes a protracted situation. Development-oriented approaches
advocate for integrating refugees into national development plans, enhancing access to
education, employment, and healthcare, and fostering self-reliance. This approach aligns with the
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which emphasize leaving no one behind, including
refugees.

Gender-sensitive approaches are crucial in refugee management theories, recognizing that

displacement affects men, women, and children differently. Gender theories highlight the
specific vulnerabilities of women and girls in refugee contexts, such as gender-based violence
and access to reproductive health services. Incorporating gender-sensitive policies ensures that
refugee management programs address the unique needs of all refugees, promoting equality and
protection.

Environmental factors are increasingly recognized in refugee management, particularly in the

context of climate change-induced displacement. The concept of environmental refugees—
people displaced due to environmental disasters—has expanded refugee management theories to
include climate resilience and adaptation strategies. This intersection between environmental and
refugee studies calls for policies that address environmental risks and support displaced
populations in adapting to new environmental conditions.

The concept of citizenship and legal status is a crucial aspect of refugee management. Theories
surrounding legal pluralism and statelessness highlight the challenges refugees face in acquiring
legal recognition and citizenship rights in host countries. Addressing these legal aspects is vital
for refugees’ access to rights, services, and social integration.

In recent years, the role of technology in refugee management has been explored through
theories related to digital inclusion and e-governance. Technology offers opportunities for
improving refugee registration, access to information, and delivery of services. Digital tools such
as biometric registration, mobile apps for aid distribution, and online education platforms are
becoming integral to modern refugee management practices.

1. Theoretical Development of Refugee Management

Theories in refugee management provide a structured understanding of displacement causes,

policy responses, and integration strategies. The most influential theories include Forced
Migration Theory, Human Rights-Based Approach, Sustainable Livelihoods Approach, Social
Capital Theory, and Political Economy Theory.
1.1 Forced Migration Theory

Forced Migration Theory explains why individuals or groups are compelled to flee their
countries due to external pressures. This theory distinguishes between voluntary migration
(where individuals relocate for better opportunities) and forced migration (where individuals flee
due to war, persecution, or environmental disasters). Scholars like Richmond (1994) and Castles
(2003) argue that forced migration is deeply linked to global inequalities, making displacement a
systemic issue rather than an isolated phenomenon.

1.2 Human Rights-Based Approach (HRBA)

The HRBA frames refugee management within the context of international human rights. The
1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol establish refugees' legal rights, including the
principle of non-refoulement (protection from forced return). Organizations like the United
Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) advocate for legal protection, asylum
access, and social rights for refugees worldwide (UNHCR, 2022).

1.3 Sustainable Livelihoods Approach (SLA)

Developed by Chambers and Conway (1992), the SLA focuses on providing refugees with
economic opportunities rather than long-term humanitarian aid. The model emphasizes
employment, entrepreneurship, education, and financial inclusion as essential components of
self-reliance (Chambers & Conway, 1992).

1.4 Social Capital Theory

Bourdieu's Social Capital Theory highlights the role of networks, relationships, and community
resources in refugee integration. Ager and Strang (2008) further developed this concept by
identifying key indicators for successful refugee integration, such as housing, employment,
education, and social networks (Ager & Strang, 2008).
1.5 Political Economy of Refugee Management

Zetter (2007) argues that refugees are often perceived as economic burdens, leading to restrictive
policies in host countries. However, recent studies show that refugees can contribute positively
to host economies through labor and entrepreneurship, shifting the perception towards viewing
refugees as economic assets (Zetter, 2007).

2. Conceptual Development of Refugee Management

Conceptual advancements in refugee management have led to improved frameworks and

policies. Key areas include refugee protection, humanitarian assistance models, integration
strategies, technological advancements, and mental health considerations.

2.1 Refugee Protection and Legal Frameworks

The legal framework for refugee protection is based on international agreements, including:

 The 1951 Refugee Convention: Defines who qualifies as a refugee and outlines their
rights (UNHCR, 2022).
 The Global Compact on Refugees (2018): Encourages burden-sharing among countries
and promotes self-reliance for refugees (United Nations, 2018).

2.2 Humanitarian Aid and Assistance Models

Over time, humanitarian aid has shifted from short-term relief to long-term development
approaches:

 Encampment Model: Refugees are placed in designated camps (e.g., Kenya’s Dadaab
camp) where structured aid is provided but freedom of movement is restricted (Betts et
al., 2016).
 Urban Refugee Model: Refugees settle in cities and integrate into local economies, as
seen in Uganda’s refugee policy (Krause, 2021).
  Cash-Based Interventions (CBIs): Organizations like UNHCR and World Food
Programme (WFP) provide financial aid instead of direct material assistance, allowing
refugees to make independent economic decisions (WFP, 2020).

2.3 Resettlement, Integration, and Return

There are three primary solutions in refugee management:

1. Voluntary Repatriation: Refugees return to their home country when conditions improve
(Black & Gent, 2006).
2. Local Integration: Refugees gain residency or citizenship in host countries (e.g.,
Germany’s refugee sponsorship programs) (Scholten et al., 2017).
3. Third-Country Resettlement: Refugees are transferred to another country for permanent
settlement (e.g., the US and Canada’s resettlement programs) (Garnier et al., 2018).

2.4 Digital and Technological Advancements in Refugee Management

Technology has revolutionized refugee management in various ways:

 Biometric Registration: UNHCR uses biometric technology to track refugee movements

and prevent aid fraud (Gelb & Metz, 2018).
 Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Big Data: AI is used to predict refugee flows and allocate
resources efficiently (Beiser, 2021).
 Blockchain Technology: The World Food Programme (WFP) has adopted blockchain-
based cash assistance programs to ensure transparency in aid distribution (WFP, 2020).

2.5 Psychosocial and Mental Health Considerations

Refugees often suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety due to
displacement. Modern refugee management includes mental health support programs,
community-based therapy, and trauma-informed care to address these challenges (Silove et al.,
2017).
2.2 Case Study of the Research

1. Uganda: A Progressive Refugee Policy Model

Uganda is often cited as a model for progressive refugee management. Unlike many host
countries that confine refugees to camps, Uganda follows an integrated settlement approach,
granting refugees freedom of movement, land for cultivation, and access to public services such
as healthcare and education. This approach aligns with the self-reliance theory, which argues that
refugees should be given opportunities to sustain themselves rather than relying solely on aid.

Key Features:

 Land Allocation: Refugees are given small plots of land to farm, promoting food
security.
 Freedom of Movement: Unlike in many other host countries, refugees in Uganda can
move freely and work legally.
 Access to National Services: Refugees can attend local schools and use the healthcare
system.

Challenges:

 Strain on resources due to a high influx of refugees, particularly from South Sudan and
the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
 Tensions between host communities and refugees over resource allocation.

2. Rohingya Crisis in Bangladesh: A Humanitarian Response

The Rohingya refugee crisis is one of the largest and most challenging refugee situations in
recent history. Since 2017, over 1 million Rohingya refugees have fled persecution in Myanmar
and settled in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, making it the world’s largest refugee camp.
Key Features:

 Emergency Humanitarian Response: Immediate provision of food, shelter, and medical

care.
 UNHCR and NGO Support: International organizations play a critical role in providing
aid and advocacy.
 Restricted Movement: Rohingya refugees are largely confined to camps, limiting their
economic opportunities.

Challenges:

 Overcrowding in camps leads to sanitation and public health crises.

 Lack of formal refugee status restricts Rohingya access to education and work.
 Political tensions between Bangladesh and Myanmar regarding repatriation.

3. Syrian Refugee Crisis in Europe: A Mixed Response

The Syrian refugee crisis, which began in 2011 due to civil war, has led to millions of refugees
seeking asylum, particularly in Europe. The response has varied significantly among European
nations, demonstrating different approaches to refugee management.

Germany’s Open-Door Policy (2015)

Germany, under Chancellor Angela Merkel, implemented a welcoming asylum policy, accepting
over 1 million refugees.

 Integration programs such as language courses and job training.

 Legal protections under EU asylum laws.
 Social tensions due to concerns over cultural integration and economic burden.
Hungary and Poland’s Restrictive Policies

In contrast, some Eastern European countries implemented strict border controls, rejecting
asylum seekers and reinforcing anti-immigration policies.

4. Venezuelan Refugee Crisis in Latin America: Regional Solidarity

The economic and political collapse of Venezuela has led to over 7 million refugees and
migrants, making it the largest displacement crisis in Latin American history.

Key Features:

 Neighboring countries like Colombia, Peru, and Ecuador have implemented

temporary protection status for Venezuelans.
 Work permits and access to healthcare have been granted in some host nations.
 Economic integration programs are being developed to include refugees in local labor
markets.

Challenges:

 Strain on social services in host countries.

 Xenophobia and discrimination in some communities.
 Political instability affects the sustainability of policies.

2.3 Comparison Between the Current Refugee Management System and the Existing
System

The existing refugee management system is traditionally structured around humanitarian aid,
which focuses on providing immediate relief to refugees in emergency situations. This system
prioritizes basic needs such as food, shelter, medical care, and security, often through refugee
camps that serve as temporary shelters. Refugees are typically restricted to these camps, with
limited freedom of movement, and are dependent on humanitarian aid for survival. This model is
mainly governed by international conventions like the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1967
Protocol, which provide protection standards but also limit the scope for economic integration or
social participation in host countries.

Under this framework, refugees often experience significant social segregation from local
communities, as they are isolated in camps, with minimal opportunities to interact with or
contribute to the host society. Access to national services such as healthcare, education, and
employment is often restricted or unavailable to refugees in many countries, further entrenching
their reliance on aid. This approach, while crucial in crisis situations, has proven to be less
sustainable in the long term, especially for protracted refugee situations, where refugees remain
in camps for many years with little chance for resettlement or local integration.

Moreover, the existing system faces considerable coordination challenges, as there is often
fragmented communication between governments, international organizations, and NGOs. The
bureaucratic process involved in refugee registration, assistance distribution, and repatriation can
be slow, and the system’s funding is heavily reliant on donations and international aid, which can
be inconsistent.

Current Refugee Management System

The current refugee management system represents a shift towards integrating refugees into the
broader socio-economic fabric of host countries, focusing on long-term sustainability rather than
just immediate relief. A significant feature of the current system is economic integration,
allowing refugees to legally work and access local job markets. This approach fosters self-
reliance, reducing dependency on humanitarian aid and promoting refugees as active contributors
to the economy. Unlike traditional systems that restrict refugees to camps, the current model
supports their freedom of movement, enabling them to live in urban areas, participate in local
economies, and access better services.

The current system emphasizes access to public services such as healthcare, education, and
housing, ensuring that refugees receive the same rights and opportunities as local citizens.
Integration programs, including language courses and vocational training, help refugees better
assimilate into host communities. By promoting social cohesion and cultural integration, the
current model helps reduce the social isolation often experienced by refugees and builds stronger
community relations between refugees and host populations.

Technology plays a crucial role in the current system, with digital tools enhancing the efficiency
of refugee management processes. Biometric registration, mobile applications, and blockchain
technology are employed to improve the accuracy of refugee data, ensure transparency, and
speed up aid distribution. These technologies allow real-time data sharing, helping organizations
respond quickly to the changing needs of refugees during crises.

A notable aspect of the current system is its focus on proactive crisis prevention. Instead of only
responding to displacement after crises occur, the current system works on conflict prevention,
early warning systems, and climate change mitigation strategies. This shift helps address the root
causes of displacement, reducing the likelihood of large refugee flows in the future.

Furthermore, the current system prioritizes gender equality and the protection of vulnerable
groups, including women, children, and persons with disabilities. Policies are in place to prevent
gender-based violence, improve access to healthcare, and provide targeted support for vulnerable
groups. Mental health services are also integrated into the healthcare system, addressing a critical
gap in traditional refugee management.

The current system also aims for more sustainable solutions by reducing refugees' dependency
on international aid. Long-term solutions like local integration, resettlement, and voluntary
repatriation are emphasized, allowing refugees to rebuild their lives and contribute to both their
host countries and countries of origin when safe to do so.

Key Differences Between the Current and Existing Systems

The most significant difference between the current and existing refugee management systems is
the shift from a relief-focused approach to one that integrates refugees into the socio-economic
development of host countries. The existing system prioritizes short-term relief, providing food,
shelter, and medical care in refugee camps. In contrast, the current system promotes self-
reliance, allowing refugees to work, access services, and integrate into local communities,
reducing long-term dependency on aid.
Another major improvement in the current system is the use of technology. While the existing
system often relies on manual or semi-digital processes for refugee registration and aid
distribution, the current system utilizes biometric identification, mobile apps, and blockchain
technology to streamline these processes. This advancement improves data accuracy,
transparency, and the speed at which refugees receive assistance.

The current system also takes a more holistic approach to refugee protection by including climate
refugees, stateless persons, and economic migrants under its legal framework. This broader
perspective helps address emerging displacement issues related to climate change and economic
instability, which the existing system does not adequately cover.

Social integration is another key area of improvement in the current system. While the existing
system tends to isolate refugees in camps, the current model promotes social cohesion by
encouraging interactions between refugees and host communities, helping to reduce xenophobia
and social tensions.

Moreover, the current system enhances access to national healthcare and education systems,
ensuring that refugees receive comprehensive healthcare services and uninterrupted education for
children and youth. This is a significant improvement over the existing system, where refugees
often have limited or no access to such services.

Challenges of the Current System

Despite its improvements, the current refugee management system faces several challenges.
Implementing digital technologies and integration programs requires significant financial
investments in infrastructure, technology, and human resources. Many host countries, especially
those already struggling economically, may find it difficult to allocate the necessary funds.

Political challenges also pose significant obstacles. Refugee integration programs often face
political resistance and opposition from local populations, who may perceive refugees as a
burden on national resources. Overcoming xenophobia and promoting social cohesion require
comprehensive public awareness campaigns and government support.
The strain on national services is another issue. Integrating refugees into healthcare, education,
and labor markets can stretch host countries’ resources, particularly in countries with already
overburdened systems. Ensuring quality services for both refugees and local populations is
essential to avoid social tensions.

Additionally, data privacy concerns arise with the digital management of refugee information.
While technologies like biometrics and blockchain improve efficiency, ensuring that refugee data
is secure and protected from misuse is critical.

2.4 Chapter Summary

This chapter examines the theoretical and conceptual foundations of refugee management,
focusing on existing frameworks, policies, and challenges. It explores the legal foundations
established by international agreements such as the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1967
Protocol, which define refugee rights and host country responsibilities.

The chapter also reviews different management approaches, including camp-based assistance,
urban integration, and self-reliance models. It highlights the role of technology in modern
refugee management, such as biometric registration, digital identification systems, and AI-driven
solutions for aid distribution and security.

Additionally, it discusses key challenges such as funding limitations, political resistance, and
socio-economic barriers that affect the effectiveness of refugee policies. The chapter concludes
that effective refugee management requires a balance between humanitarian aid, integration
efforts, and technological advancements to ensure sustainable solutions.

References

 Ager, A., & Strang, A. (2008). Understanding integration: A conceptual framework.

Journal of Refugee Studies.
 Beiser, M. (2021). Refugees and AI: The next frontier in displacement research.
Migration Studies.
 Betts, A., Omata, N., & Sterck, O. (2016). Refugee economies: Rethinking popular
assumptions. Oxford University Press.
 Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods. Institute of
Development Studies.
 UNHCR (2022). Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2022. United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees.
 Zetter, R. (2007). More labels, fewer refugees. Journal of Refugee Studies.