0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views33 pages

Laptop

The document presents a comprehensive literature review of various studies examining the influence of family background, socioeconomic status, parental involvement, and social media on students' academic performance. Key findings indicate that family and socioeconomic factors significantly impact academic self-efficacy and achievement, while social media usage can have both positive and negative effects on student performance. Additionally, studies highlight the importance of parental education and involvement in shaping children's educational outcomes.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views33 pages

Laptop

The document presents a comprehensive literature review of various studies examining the influence of family background, socioeconomic status, parental involvement, and social media on students' academic performance. Key findings indicate that family and socioeconomic factors significantly impact academic self-efficacy and achievement, while social media usage can have both positive and negative effects on student performance. Additionally, studies highlight the importance of parental education and involvement in shaping children's educational outcomes.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Here is the literature review information for each paper in a structured format:

---

1. Family Background, Students’ Academic Self-Efficacy, and Students’ Career and Life Success
Expectations

Author: Mihyeon Kim (2014)

Type of Data: Secondary Data (Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002)

Sample Size: Weighted sample of 1,823,004 students

Research Technique: Path Model Analysis (Structural Equation Modeling)

Type of Variables:

Independent Variables: Family Background (Income, Parental Advice)

Mediating Variable: Academic Self-Efficacy

Dependent Variable: Career and Life Success Expectations

Findings:

Family background positively influences academic self-efficacy.

Academic self-efficacy enhances career and life success expectations.

Without academic self-efficacy, family background negatively affects students' expectations.


---

2. The Impact of Students’ Socio-economic Background on Academic Performance in


Universities: A Case of Students in Kisii University College

Author: Dr. Charles Kombo Okioga (2013)

Type of Data: Primary Data (Survey)

Sample Size: 186 students from Kisii University College

Research Technique: Descriptive and Inferential Statistics (Regression Analysis, Likert Scale,
ANOVA)

Type of Variables:

Independent Variables: Socio-economic Background (Income, Parental Education)

Dependent Variable: Academic Performance

Findings:

Students from middle-class families receive structured academic support and perform better.

Lower-income students face challenges in accessing educational resources.

Socio-economic background significantly influences academic performance.


---

3. The Impact of Parental Socioeconomic Status on Students’ Academic Achievement in


Secondary Schools in Tanzania

Author: Orestes Silverius Kapinga (2014)

Type of Data: Primary Data (Survey, Interviews, Focused Group Discussions)

Sample Size: 60 respondents (Parents, Teachers, Students)

Research Technique: Thematic Analysis, Documentary Review

Type of Variables:

Independent Variables: Parental Socioeconomic Status (Occupation, Education, Income)

Dependent Variable: Academic Achievement

Findings:

Students from low-SES families struggle with academic performance due to financial and
educational resource limitations.

Parental involvement is low, contributing to weaker academic outcomes.

SES directly impacts school readiness and student success.


4. Factors Affecting Students’ Academic Performance

Author: Unknown

Type of Data: Mixed Data (Primary and Secondary)

Sample Size: Not mentioned

Research Technique: Descriptive Statistics

Type of Variables:

Independent Variables: Parental SES, Student Behavior, School Environment

Dependent Variable: Academic Performance

Findings:

Parental education and financial status are key determinants of student performance.

School environment and support structures also play a critical role.

Socioeconomic constraints limit students' ability to access better educational opportunities.

5. The Impact of Parental Involvement, Parental Support, and Family Education on Pupil
Achievements and Adjustment

Author: Professor Charles Desforges, Alberto Abouchaar (2003)

Type of Data: Literature Review

Sample Size: Not applicable (Review of multiple studies)

Research Technique: Review and Meta-Analysis

Type of Variables:

Independent Variables: Parental Involvement (Home Support, School Participation)

Dependent Variables: Pupil Achievement and Adjustment

Findings:

Parental involvement, especially at-home parenting, has a significant impact on academic


achievement.

The effect is more pronounced in primary education than in secondary education.


Socioeconomic status influences the level of parental involvement.

6. Parental Involvement and Educational Achievement

Author: Geert Driessen, Frederik Smit, Peter Sleegers (2005)

Type of Data: Large-scale survey data (Dutch PRIMA cohort study)

Sample Size: 12,000 pupils from 500+ schools

Research Technique: Statistical Analysis (Regression Analysis)

Type of Variables:

Independent Variables: Parental Involvement (Home Support, Volunteering, Communication with


School)

Dependent Variables: Educational Achievement (Language and Math Skills)

Findings:

Schools with more minority students tend to put in extra effort for parental involvement.

No direct significant effect of parental involvement on academic achievement was found.

Socioeconomic factors and parental education level are stronger determinants of student
success.

7. Effect of Socio-Economic Status on Academic Performance of Secondary School Students

Author: Mushtaq Ahmad Bhat, Dr. Jyotsna Joshi, Irfan Ahmad Wani (2016)

Type of Data: Primary Data (Survey)

Sample Size: 120 students from 12 secondary schools in Jammu & Kashmir

Research Technique: Descriptive Statistics (Mean, Standard Deviation, t-test)

Type of Variables:

Independent Variables: Socio-Economic Status (Parental Income, Education, Occupation)

Dependent Variable: Academic Performance

Findings:

Students from high socio-economic status (SES) families performed significantly better than
those from low SES backgrounds.

A significant difference was found between high and middle SES students, but not between
middle and low SES students.

Parental financial stability and education level play a crucial role in student performance.

8. The Effects of Family Income on Test-Anxiety and Academic Achievement Among Iranian
High School Students

Author: Yousefi Fayegh, Ma'rof Redzuan, Juhari Rumaya, Mansor Abu Talib (2010)

Type of Data: Primary Data (Survey and Psychological Testing)

Sample Size: High school students from Iran (exact number not mentioned)

Research Technique: Statistical Analysis (Correlation and Regression)

Type of Variables:

Independent Variable: Family Income

Dependent Variables: Test Anxiety, Academic Achievement

Findings:

Higher family income is associated with lower test anxiety and higher academic achievement.

Students from low-income families experience higher stress, which negatively affects their
performance.

Socioeconomic support can help reduce anxiety and improve academic success.

1st Study

Title, Author & Year:

The Influence of Familial Factors on the Association Between IQ and Educational and
Occupational Achievement: A Sibling Approach - Emilie Rune Hegelund et al., 2019

Type of Data:

Register-based study

Sample Size:

364,193 individuals
Research Technique:

Cohort analysis and within-sibship analysis

Type of Variables:

IQ, GPA, gross income, social benefits

Findings:

IQ is positively associated with educational and occupational achievements, but familial factors
explain a significant part of this association.

---

2nd Study

Title, Author & Year:

IQ and Family Background: Are Associations Strong or Weak? - Anders Björklund et al., 2009

Type of Data:

Register-based study
Sample Size:

379,456 brothers, 22,626 father-son pairs

Research Technique:

Statistical correlation analysis

Type of Variables:

IQ, educational attainment, sibling similarities

Findings:

About half of IQ variation is due to shared family factors. The correlation between father-son IQ
is 0.35, and between brothers, it is 0.47.

---

3rd Study
Title, Author & Year:

Parents’ Education and Children’s Intelligence - Rindermann & Ceci, 2013

Type of Data:

Path analysis across multiple studies

Sample Size:

15,133 observations from 7 countries

Research Technique:

Path analysis using Mplus and FIML

Type of Variables:

Parental education, income, children's IQ


Findings:

Parental education has a stronger effect on children's IQ than parental income. The effect of
books at home was also significant.

---

4th Study

Title, Author & Year:

The Role of Intelligence and Cognitive Ability in Economic and Social Development - (Author
details unclear)

Type of Data:

Cross-sectional study

Sample Size:

Varies by study
Research Technique:

Econometric modeling and regression analysis

Type of Variables:

IQ, income, educational level, economic growth

Findings:

Higher cognitive ability is associated with economic growth and social progress.

Let me know if you need further refinements!

5th Study
Title, Author & Year:

Academic Success in Adolescence: Relationships Among Verbal IQ, Social Support, and
Emotional Intelligence - Marjorie J. Hogan et al., 2010

Type of Data:

Cross-sectional study

Sample Size:

192 students (96 male, 96 female)

Research Technique:

Mediation analysis

Type of Variables:

Verbal IQ, emotional intelligence, peer social support, family social support, GPA
Findings:

For males, emotional intelligence (EI) and peer social support predicted GPA, and EI mediated
the relationship between verbal IQ and GPA.

For females, EI, peer social support, and family support predicted GPA but did not mediate the
relationship between verbal IQ and GPA.

---

6th Study

Title, Author & Year:

Investigating the Predictive Roles of Working Memory and IQ in Academic Attainment - Tracy
Packiam Alloway & Ross G. Alloway, 2010

Type of Data:

Longitudinal study

Sample Size:
98 children (tested at ages 5 and 11)

Research Technique:

Regression analysis

Type of Variables:

Working memory, IQ, literacy, numeracy

Findings:

Working memory at age 5 was the strongest predictor of literacy and numeracy at age 11,
outperforming IQ.

IQ accounted for a smaller portion of variance in learning outcomes compared to working


memory.

---

7th Study
Title, Author & Year:

Intelligence and Educational Achievement - Ian J. Deary et al., 2007

Type of Data:

Longitudinal study

Sample Size:

70,000+ English students

Research Technique:

Correlation and latent trait analysis

Type of Variables:

IQ, GCSE scores in 25 subjects, gender differences


Findings:

IQ at age 11 strongly predicted GCSE scores at age 16 (correlation = 0.81).

IQ explained 58.6% of variance in Mathematics and 48% in English.

Girls performed better in all subjects except Physics, despite no differences in general
intelligence.

---

8th Study

Title, Author & Year:

Relationship Between IQ and Academic Performance of Medical Students - Komal Iqbal et al.,
2021

Type of Data:

Cross-sectional study
Sample Size:

100 second-year MBBS students (46 males, 54 females)

Research Technique:

Spearman’s correlation, t-test, Mann-Whitney U test

Type of Variables:

IQ (measured using WAIS), academic achievement (past records and test scores)

Findings:

Males had higher IQ (mean 97.4) than females (mean 89.6), with a statistically significant
difference (p = 0.04).

IQ was not significantly correlated with academic achievement.

Hard work, rather than IQ, was suggested as the reason for similar academic performance
between high- and low-IQ students.
---

Let me know if you need any modifications or further details!

9th Study

Title, Author & Year:

Social Media Use, Engagement, and Addiction as Predictors of Academic Performance - Jamal
J. Al-Menayes, 2015

Type of Data:

Cross-sectional survey

Sample Size:

1,327 university students

Research Technique:
Factor analysis and regression analysis

Type of Variables:

Social media usage, engagement, addiction, academic performance (GPA)

Findings:

Time spent on social media negatively correlated with academic performance.

Social media engagement had no significant impact on academic performance.

Social media addiction was a negative predictor of academic performance.

---

10th Study

Title, Author & Year:

Facebook and Academic Performance - Paul A. Kirschner & Aryn C. Karpinski, 2010
Type of Data:

Cross-sectional survey

Sample Size:

Not specified in the snippet, but includes university students

Research Technique:

Descriptive and exploratory survey analysis

Type of Variables:

Facebook usage, study time, academic performance (GPA)

Findings:

Facebook users reported lower GPAs and spent fewer hours studying compared to non-users.
Facebook use was linked to increased multitasking, which negatively affected learning
efficiency.

---

11th Study

Title, Author & Year:

Effect of Online Social Networking on Student Academic Performance - Jomon Aliyas Paul,
Hope M. Baker, Justin Daniel Cochran, 2012

Type of Data:

Survey-based study

Sample Size:

Business students from a large state university (exact number not specified)
Research Technique:

Structural equation modeling (SEM)

Type of Variables:

Time spent on social media, attention span, academic performance (GPA), student
characteristics

Findings:

A statistically significant negative relationship between time spent on social media and
academic performance.

Attention span played a mediating role; students with higher attention spans spent less time on
social media.

---

12th Study

Title, Author & Year:


AI and Traditional Learning: Complementary Strategies for Deeper Learning - Microsoft
Research & Cambridge University Press & Assessment, 2024

Type of Data:

Experimental study

Sample Size:

405 secondary school students

Research Technique:

Randomized controlled trial (RCT)

Type of Variables:

AI-assisted learning, traditional note-taking, reading comprehension, memory retention

Findings:
Traditional note-taking resulted in higher comprehension and retention compared to AI-only
learning.

A combination of AI and note-taking was more effective than using AI alone.

Students preferred AI for its ability to simplify concepts and provide immediate feedback.

---

Let me know if you need any further refinements or additional details!

13th Study

Title, Author & Year:

Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review - Lijia Chen, Pingping Chen, Zhijian Lin, 2020

Type of Data:

Literature review

Sample Size:
More than 40 studies analyzed

Research Technique:

Thematic and content analysis

Type of Variables:

AI applications in education, student performance, teaching methods, administrative efficiency

Findings:

AI enhances administrative tasks, grading, and content personalization.

AI-based systems improve learning efficiency and global accessibility.

Personalized learning through AI fosters better student engagement and retention.

---
14th Study

Title, Author & Year:

Comparing the Effectiveness of Classroom and Online Learning: Teaching Research Methods -
Anna Ya Ni, 2013

Type of Data:

Comparative study

Sample Size:

Not specified, but based on multiple sections of a graduate public administration course

Research Technique:

Grade analysis and student surveys

Type of Variables:

Learning mode (online vs. classroom), student performance (grades), student engagement
Findings:

No significant difference in academic performance between online and classroom students.

Online learning offers flexibility but may lead to lower persistence in complex subjects.

Online interactions can increase participation compared to traditional classroom settings.

---

15th Study

Title, Author & Year:

Out of the Laboratory and into the Classroom: The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Education -
Daniel Schiff, 2021

Type of Data:

Conceptual and policy analysis


Sample Size:

Not applicable (theoretical discussion)

Research Technique:

Literature synthesis and policy analysis

Type of Variables:

AI capabilities, intelligent tutoring systems, teacher-student interaction, education policies

Findings:

AI can simulate teachers and provide personalized instruction but lacks socio-emotional depth.

Implementation challenges include funding, training, and integration into existing curricula.

AI in education must balance automation with human interaction for effective learning.
Let me know if you need any more studies processed!

Social Media and Academic Performance Studies

16th Study

Title, Author & Year:

Impact of Social Media on Student’s Academic Performance - Rithika M. & Sara Selvaraj, 2013

Type of Data:

Survey-based study

Sample Size:

100 students

Research Technique:

Chi-square analysis
Type of Variables:

Gender, education, social influence, academic performance

Findings:

Frequent use of social media negatively affects academic performance.

Social media usage significantly impacts assignment submission timeliness.

Increased social media use correlates with lifestyle changes and lower focus on studies.

---

17th Study

Title, Author & Year:

The Impact of Social Media on Academic Performance of Selected College Students - Gilbert M.
Talaue et al., 2018
Type of Data:

Survey-based study

Sample Size:

60 students from a university in Saudi Arabia

Research Technique:

Descriptive research design

Type of Variables:

Social media usage, time spent online, academic achievement

Findings:

Social media has both positive and negative impacts on student performance.

It helps students in research and networking but also leads to distractions.


Excessive use can lead to time mismanagement and reduced focus on studies.

---

18th Study

Title, Author & Year:

Influence of Social Media on Students’ Academic Achievement - Basil C.E. Oguguo et al., 2020

Type of Data:

Ex-post facto study

Sample Size:

150 students (70 males, 80 females)

Research Technique:
Mean, standard deviation, t-test analysis

Type of Variables:

Frequency of social media use, gender, academic achievement (Accounting scores)

Findings:

No significant influence of social media use on academic performance.

Students spent 2–4 hours daily on social media.

Gender had a significant impact on academic achievement.

You might also like