0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views3 pages

Minimal Cover of Functional Dependencies

The document provides a detailed procedure for finding the minimal cover or irreducible set from given functional dependencies through steps of union simplification, removal of redundant functional dependencies, and simplification of left-hand sides. Two examples illustrate the process, showing how to determine which functional dependencies are non-redundant and how to reduce the set. The final irreducible sets for both examples are presented clearly.

Uploaded by

mohdshoaib6575
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views3 pages

Minimal Cover of Functional Dependencies

The document provides a detailed procedure for finding the minimal cover or irreducible set from given functional dependencies through steps of union simplification, removal of redundant functional dependencies, and simplification of left-hand sides. Two examples illustrate the process, showing how to determine which functional dependencies are non-redundant and how to reduce the set. The final irreducible sets for both examples are presented clearly.

Uploaded by

mohdshoaib6575
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Example 1: Find the minimal cover or irreducible set from the following functional

dependencies :
AB → CD
BC → D
Solution:

Step 1: Union Simplification:


AB → C (1)
AB → D (2)
BC → D (3)

Step 2: Removal of Redundant set of FDs


I. Find the closure of LHS of (1), i.e. Compute (AB) + from (2) and (3) by hiding (1). If
we get RHS of (1) in the closure, i.e. 'C', then (1) is redundant, otherwise non
redundant.
(AB)+ = {ABD} as (AB)+ will not determine C, So AB → C is non redundant.
II. Similarly for (2), Compute (AB)+ from (1) and (3) by hiding (2).
(AB)+ = {ABCD} as (AB)+ will determine D, therefore, AB → D is redundant.
Now, Remaining FDs = {AB→C, BC→D}
III. For (3), Compute (BC)+ from (1) by hiding (3).
(BC)+ = {BC} as (BC)+ will not determine D, so, BC → D is also non redundant.

Step 3: LHS Simplification or Removal of Extraneous Attributes


FDs remained after step 2
AB→C (3)
BC→D (4)

AB → C

(i) Remove A from AB → C, and find B+ from (4). If the attribute A exists in the closure,
then A is said to be redundant.
B+ = {B} ⇒ A is Non Redundant

(ii) Remove B from AB → C and find A+ from (4).


A+ = {A} ⇒ B is Non Redundant.

BC → D

(i) Remove B from BC → D, and find C+ from (3).


C+ = {C} ⇒ B is Non Redundant

(ii) Remove C from BC → D and find B+ from (3).


B+ = {B} ⇒ C is Non Redundant

Apply step 2 again if we find any redundant attribute, otherwise skip. So Finally, Irreducible
set will be
AB→C
BC→D
Example 2:
Find the minimal cover or irreducible set from the following functional dependencies:
ABCD → E (1)
E→D (2)
AC → D (3)
A→B (4)
Solution:

Step 1: No need for union simplification as FDs are already simplified.

Step 2: Removal of redundant set of FDs

(i) For (1), Compute (ABCD)+ from (2) (3) and (4) by hiding (1).
(ABCD)+ = {ABCD}
⇒ ABCD → E is non redundant.
(ii) For (2), Compute (E)+ from (1) (3) and (4) by hiding (2).
(E)+ = {E}
⇒ E → D is non redundant.
(iii) For (3), Compute (AC)+ from (1) (2) and (4) by hiding (3).
(AC)+ = {ACB}
⇒ AC → D is non redundant.
(iv) For (4), Compute (A)+ from (1) (2) and (3) by hiding (4).
(A)+ = {A}
⇒ A → B is non redundant.

Step 3: LHS Simplification or Removal of Extraneous Attributes:


FDs remained after step 2 is same as in step 1.
ABCD → E
(i) Remove A from ABCD → E, and find BCD+ from (2) (3) and (4). If attribute A
exists in the closure, then A is said to be redundant.
(BCD)+ = {BCD} ⇒ A is Non Redundant

(ii) Remove B from ABCD → E and find ACD+ from (2) (3) and (4).
(ACD)+ = {ACDB} ⇒ B is Redundant.
⇒ FD will now reduced to ACD → E

(iii) Remove C from ACD → E, and find AD+ from (2) (3) and (4).
(AD)+ = {ADB} ⇒ C is Non Redundant.

(iv) Remove D from ACD → E, and find AC+ from (2) (3) and (4).
(AC)+ = {ACDB} ⇒ D is Redundant.
⇒ FD will now reduced to AC → E

AC → D
(i) Remove A from AC → D and find C+ from (1) (2) and (4).
(C)+ = {C} ⇒ A is non redundant.

(ii) Remove C from AC → D and find A+ from (1) (2) and (4).
(A)+ = {AB} ⇒ C is non redundant.
FDs remained after step 3 are:
AC → E (5)
E→D (6)
AC → D (7)
A→B (8)

Step 4: Applying step 2 again to find redundant FDs


(i) For (5), Compute (AC)+ from (6) (7) and (8) by hiding (5).
(AC)+ = {ACDB}
⇒ AC → E is non redundant.

(ii) For (6), Compute (E)+ from (5) (7) and (8) by hiding (6).
(E)+ = {E}
⇒ E → D is non redundant.

(iii) For (7), Compute (AC)+ from (5) (6) and (8) by hiding (7).
(AC)+ = {ACEDB}
⇒ AC → D is redundant. So, excluded.

(iv) For (8), Compute (A)+ from (5) and (6) by hiding (8).
(A)+ = {AB}
⇒ A → B is non redundant.

So Finally, Irreducible set will be


AC → E
E→D
A→B

You might also like