0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views1 page

Orissa Service Code Amendment Notification

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views1 page

Orissa Service Code Amendment Notification

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

...

'

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

The 22nd Apri I 1 992

No. 18264- Pen-5/92/F.-In exercise cf the powers conferred by the provi�o to Article 309 of the
_
Constitution of India, the' Governor of Orissa is pleased to ma�e the following amendment to the
Orissa Service Code, namely:-
AMENDMENT

In the Orissa Service Code,-

in rule 52, for the word "thirty" the words "thirty-two" shall be substituted

By order of the Governor


P. K. PATNAIK
Principal Secretary to Governmttnt

No. 19752-Pen-13/92-F.

FINANCE 'DEPARTMENT

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

The 30th April 1992

Subject-Maintenance of Service Book/Service Roll in duplicate.


• •

Service Book/Service Roll is the repository of Service records of Government employees procedures
for pr<l!ler maintenance of Service Book/Service Roll in duplicate vis-a-vis their utility have been
laid dc:wn in detail under Appecdix-11 and 11·A of Orissa Service Code. Very often It iS" found
by the Government thatthe afcresaid ccdifi�d previsions of Orissa Service Cede still remain urnoticed
by certain Head of Offices and their employees, as a result, the Service Book/Service Roll is not
maintained !l}
up-to-date along with records of the requisite service verification certificate e rein, from.
the concerned Drawing Officer. · .
,

2. Non-maintcncnce of the Service Bcok/Setvice Roll in duplicate n9t only cause, inordinate
celay fot· senction of retirement · benefits of a Government employee but also causes
avoid able, harrassment to the �mployee concerned long after his/her retirement. The Government
is
also put to an embarasing situation in different for a liko pension Adalat,AdministrativeTribunals/Courts
tor such dolay. Instances are also not rare, where it is eported by the Head o f the office/
pension sanctioning authority that the origina I Service Book/Service Roll is either damaged,
lost or missent, leading to a dead.-lock situation about the non-release of pensionary benifits of the
concerned employee.

3. To avoid such stand still position referred to in Para.-2 above "the Duplicate Government
Selvant's copy" of Service Book/Service Roll should be
kept ready In an up to-date f;rm,
fo(
acceptance by A ccountant-General (Accounts/Audit). Orissa for the purpose of pension as per .t h e
rules provided Under Appendix-11 and 11-A o f Orissa Service Code. A n y negligence i n thi�
regard, either on the part of the Head of the office or employee concerned shall be seriously
viewed bY the 'Gover.,ment.

s. RATH
Joint Secretary to Governme11t

Common questions

Powered by AI

The procedural recommendations for maintaining the Service Book/Service Roll include ensuring that these records are kept in duplicate and updated regularly. This practice ensures that both the original and the duplicate records are available to prevent any delay or loss of pensionary benefits due to discrepancies or damage to records. Additionally, Appendix-11 and 11-A of the Orissa Service Code detail methods of record keeping to prevent such issues. Furthermore, records should be ready for submission to the Accountant-General for audit or accounts purposes .

Failure to maintain Service Books/Service Rolls accurately can lead to administrative difficulties for the government, including delays in processing retirement benefits, facing challenges in court or tribunals, and dealing with employee grievances. This could create an overall negative impact on the government's efficiency and reputation as it struggles to meet its obligations towards its retired employees .

The 1992 Office Memorandum addresses the issue of lost or damaged Service Books by suggesting the maintenance of a duplicate copy of these records. This duplicate copy serves as a backup to the original, ensuring that pensionary benefits can still be processed even if the original records are inaccessible. The memorandum implies that all records should accordingly be kept up-to-date and verified for accuracy, reducing potential losses .

The amendment to the Orissa Service Code involved changing the word 'thirty' to 'thirty-two' in rule 52, as documented in the Finance Department Notification on 22nd April 1992. This change signifies an adjustment in rules associated with the service period of government employees, likely affecting the calculation of service benefits or durations related to employees' terms of service .

The 1992 Office Memorandum emphasizes accountability by stating that any negligence in maintaining the Service Books/Service Rolls by either the Head of Office or the employee will be seriously viewed by the government. This highlights a clear expectation for all parties involved to adhere to established procedures and maintain accountability in record keeping to avoid administrative complications and delays .

The strategies include maintaining Service Books/Service Rolls in duplicate to prevent issues related to original records becoming lost, damaged, or misplaced. Regular updates and verifications of these records are mandated to ensure they are ready for review by audit authorities, thereby fixing any potential 'embarrassing situations' the government might face in pension adjudications or tribunals due to incomplete or missing records .

Negligence in maintaining Service Book/Service Roll in duplicate is viewed seriously by the government. It can lead to delays or inability to sanction retirement benefits legally, potentially resulting in lapsed pensions for retired government employees. The memorandum highlights that any negligence, either by the employee or the office head, will be seriously viewed and likely followed by administrative consequences .

The document suggests maintaining a duplicate Service Book/Service Roll that is kept current as a solution to the 'inordinate delay' in sanctioning retirement benefits. This ensures that there is always an accurate and verifiable record available for processing by the Accountant-General, thereby minimizing delays due to record issues. Ensuring that these duplicates are regularly updated would address both potential delays and the prevention of harassment for employees .

The role of the Head of Office is crucial in maintaining accurate service records, as they are responsible for ensuring compliance with the guidelines. They must oversee the proper upkeep and verification of Service Books/Service Rolls to prevent administrative backlogs and inaccuracies that could affect employee benefits. Negligence in this responsibility is taken seriously, underscoring the importance of their role in managing these records effectively .

Maintaining up-to-date Service Books/Service Rolls is critical because failure to do so can cause significant delays in the sanction of retirement benefits and result in avoidable harassment for employees after retirement. Moreover, it can place the government in embarrassingly complicated situations before forums like pension Adalats or Administrative Tribunals due to missing or damaged records. Hence, keeping these records updated ensures timely processing of an employee's benefits and prevents institutional challenges .

You might also like