Scribd
Upload
855 views1 page

05 Activity 1

1. Paul Loui Biteng violated several provisions of the Philippine cybercrime prevention law by committing cybercrimes in Manila. 2. To prevent future incidents, the cybersecurity agency should strengthen its security by studying complex threats and ensuring an even stronger security posture. 3. Biteng could face imprisonment of up to 3 years or more given the seriousness of hacking the Commission on Elections, which could affect many people.

Uploaded by

Robert Basan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
855 views1 page

05 Activity 1

1. Paul Loui Biteng violated several provisions of the Philippine cybercrime prevention law by committing cybercrimes in Manila. 2. To prevent future incidents, the cybersecurity agency should strengthen its security by studying complex threats and ensuring an even stronger security posture. 3. Biteng could face imprisonment of up to 3 years or more given the seriousness of hacking the Commission on Elections, which could affect many people.

Uploaded by

Robert Basan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Guide Questions:

1. Which specific cybercrime offenses did Biteng violate?

• Based on what I read, Paul Loui Biteng specific cybercrime offense is several violations of the
cybercrime prevention law. these are cybercrime offenses committed by Biteng in the cities of
manila.

2. What can the agency do to strengthen cybersecurity to prevent the incident from reoccurring?

• For my own opinion, what I can say here is for them to strengthen the cybersecurity agency to
avoid this kind of incident again, they should strengthen their security and study the complex
things that will damage their security so much that what happened will not happen again and
for Their security is even stronger.

3. Based on the identified cybercrime offenses, what probable penalties could he face?

• The possible punishment he will face for hacking of the Comelec is imprisonment for up to 3
years or more because this is a big crime that will affect many people that no one knows about,
and these kinds of people should be held accountable.

4. In your perspective, what are the possible adverse effects of his offenses?

• For my own opinion, the possible bad effects of his crime are many things that should not be
revealed because there are many people who will be sensitive and the effect of this is that it will
go to the person who ordered him, the vote of all people and the person who ordered may be
blind. in its mind.

You might also like