0% found this document useful (0 votes)
290 views2 pages

Plato vs. Aristotle: Ideal State Comparison

Plato and Aristotle had differing views of the ideal state. Plato believed the state should be ruled by a philosopher-king and divided citizens into classes like the body (rulers, auxiliaries, laborers). Aristotle saw the state as existing to meet people's needs like a family, and favored democracy or rule by the many. However, they agreed citizens should obey laws and each contribute their talents to society for the greater good.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
290 views2 pages

Plato vs. Aristotle: Ideal State Comparison

Plato and Aristotle had differing views of the ideal state. Plato believed the state should be ruled by a philosopher-king and divided citizens into classes like the body (rulers, auxiliaries, laborers). Aristotle saw the state as existing to meet people's needs like a family, and favored democracy or rule by the many. However, they agreed citizens should obey laws and each contribute their talents to society for the greater good.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Mark Joshua A.

Demate October 28, 2020


I-AB Philosophy Ancient Philosophy
Compare and Contrast: Plato and Aristotle’s “Ideal State.”

According to the merriam-webster dictionary, the word state means: a body of

people occupying a territory and organized under one ruler or government; 1 and after

reading few articles as regards the definition of a state, state for me is a composition of

people that is living in a particular place that shares unique individual talents for the

greater good of the society, that is led by someone who is capable in ensuring the

security and the convenience of the whole society. But for the two Ancient

Philosophers: Aristotle and Plato, the essence and meaning of a state for them is

somewhat far beyond my understanding, at least for the most part of it. However, after

reading and reading and reading few articles about their “ideal state”, I finally

understood and grasp the thoughts that they are trying to say, at least some of the most

important part of it.

I will start first by discussing about Plato’s idea about his ideal state, for him, he

believed that the state should be governed by a Philosopher-King who has a proper

intellect and reason to lead. He bases his explanation about this to the construction of

the human body, as the human body is consist of head, heart and stomach the functions

together in order for us to live, 2


according to Plato, a state is also composed of three

parts that are alike, termed as: Rulers being the head of the state, Auxiliaries being the

chest of the state, and the laborers as the stomach of the state; for him, this system is

somehow necessary to be fulfilled and done in order for the state to be good. Also for

him, the creation of a good state will depend on its ruler if he is governing by reason,

1
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary, pg. 699
2
Gaarder, Jostein., Sophie’s World, pg.77-78
just as the head governs the body by reason, so a ruler should also govern a state by

reason.3 He also exclaims that the government should enable the citizens to live a “good

life”. But he said that the only people who understand the moral values necessary for

that good life are philosophers himself. So, government should be ruled by Philosopher-

King.4 His ideal state is somehow a monarchial government led by a dictator.

Aristotle on the one hand have his own opinion and idea about an “ideal state”

for him the state came into being to meet the various needs of mean, according to him it

is like a family that is designed to ensure the security and well-being of its members. He

says that “man is a political animal” who needs the company of his fellow man.

Aristotle also describes 3 good forms of constitution which are: Monarchy, Aristocracy,

and Polity.5 His ideal state is any of these three forms but he is more favor in Polity

(Democracy).

In the other hand, these two philosophers are somewhat similar in some of their

ideas about their ideal state, particularly in their stand that: each and every person has

his or her own function in the society for the good of the whole. They both believe that

in order for a state to function very well, all citizens must obey the laws and perform his

duties and occupation related to his or her own talent and capability in the society.

Aristotle conclude that: “Without a society around us, we cannot survive.”

3
Ibid.
4
Weeks, Marcus., What would Nietzsche do?, Pg.153
5
Gaarder, Jostein., Sophie’s World, pg.97

Common questions

Powered by AI

Both philosophers conceive the state as an organic whole where individuals have distinct roles contributing to societal well-being. Plato's state relies on a metaphysical understanding where the philosopher-king ensures the alignment of each class's function for societal harmony . Aristotle emphasizes practical governance, proposing a society structured like a family, wherein each individual must perform their natural role to achieve personal and collective goals, reinforcing the notion that societal structure is rooted in natural relationships and functions .

Aristotle views the state's purpose as ensuring the security and well-being of its members, akin to a family meeting various needs. He perceives the state as essential for survival due to humans' social nature . Plato, on the other hand, centers the state's purpose around the enabling of citizens to live a 'good life,' guided by moral values understood only by philosophers. He sees the state as a mechanism to facilitate the pursuit of virtue and knowledge, led by a Philosopher-King .

Plato advocates for a Philosopher-King as the ruler of his ideal state, emphasizing the importance of intellect and reason in governance. He likens the ruler's role to that of the head governing the body, suggesting that reason should guide state governance as it guides human functions . Conversely, Aristotle sees the ruler's role in a broader context, focusing more on meeting the needs of the citizens and maintaining the well-being of the community. According to him, the ideal state can be managed under a monarchy, aristocracy, or polity, but he favors polity, or democracy, which underscores collective governance .

Both Plato and Aristotle agree that each individual has a specific function within the state, and that the effective performance of these roles contributes to the good of the whole society. They stress the need for individuals to obey the laws and perform duties correlating with their talents and capabilities, ensuring the state's functionality .

Aristotle's assertion that 'man is a political animal' reflects his broader philosophy emphasizing human beings as social creatures whose functions and purposes are best realized within a community. This perspective aligns with his teleological approach, where everything has a purpose and is directed towards achieving its full potential. He views society as a natural and essential structure for the development of individuals and the realization of human potential .

Aristotle favors polity because it represents a middle ground or a balance between the extremes of oligarchy and democracy. He believes it allows for a stable and just distribution of power where both the rich and the poor can participate, thus ensuring the rule of law and protecting the interests of all citizens. This balance helps maintain stability and prevents the decay into the negative forms of government such as tyranny and oligarchy .

Plato envisions the structure of society in an ideal state as analogous to the human body. The ruling class, or the Philosopher-Kings, represent the head, providing intellect and reason. The auxiliaries, akin to the chest, provide courage and enforce the rulers' determinations, while the laborers, associated with the stomach, ensure the basic needs and functions of the state. This metaphor underscores the necessity of harmony between different societal classes to achieve a good state .

Plato argues that philosophers are uniquely qualified to govern because they possess the wisdom and moral virtue necessary to understand and implement the 'good life' for citizens. He believes that philosophers, having access to higher truths and ultimate moral values, are best equipped to govern by reason, similar to how reason should guide human life, thus ensuring an enlightened and just state .

By describing man as a 'political animal', Aristotle emphasizes that humans naturally seek community and societal engagement as an inherent trait. This idea underpins his theory of the state by suggesting that the formation of communities and states is a natural outcome of human interaction, driven by the necessity for cooperation and mutual benefits. He considers political structures essential for individuals’ survival and fulfillment, highlighting humans' innate inclination towards organizing themselves in political entities .

Aristotle's polity is a form of government that emphasizes a balance between the rich and the poor, promoting the participation of citizens in democratic governance. This contrasts with Plato's concept of a Philosopher-King, which is more hierarchical and authoritarian, concentrating power in the hands of a singular, ideally wise ruler who governs based on reason and moral understanding .

You might also like