AOI[3]: Smart Refractory Sensor Systems for
Wireless Monitoring of Temperature, Health,
and Degradation of Slagging Gasifiers
PI Team:
Dr. Debangsu Bhattacharyya a
Mr. Jeffrey Bogan b
Dr. David Graham c
Dr. Vinod Kulathumani c
Dr. Edward M. Sabolsky d
aDepartment
of Chemical Engineering, WVU
bHarbisonWalker International Technology Center
cLane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU
dDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, WVU
Researcher Team:
Post-doc
Rajalekshmi Pillai
Graduate Students
Qiao Huang
Gunes Yakaboylu
Steven Andryzcik
Priyashraba Misra
Undergraduate Students
Brian Armour
James Meyer
HWI Team
4/27/2016
Margaret Raughley
Joshua Sayre
Acknowledgements:
We would like to thank U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for
funding the project under contract DE-FE0012383.
Dr. Maria Reidpath, U. S. Department of Energy, is greatly
appreciated for her insight and valuable guidance.
We also would like to acknowledge WVU Shared Facilities.
Thanks to HarbisonWalker International for the technical
staff.
Kindly acknowledge Faculty and staff of West Virginia
University for their support.
4/27/2016
Background- Gasifier Sensing Needs:
Online monitoring sensors of refractory used in coal gasifiers under
extreme conditions including high temperature (>1300oC) and high
pressure (up to 1000 psi) for >20,000 hr.
Erosive and corrosive conditions (due to slag and high pressure, in
addition to various pO2 levels) causes degradation of refractory over
time.
Ability to monitor the integrity of the refractory materials during
gasifier operation would contribute significantly to improving the
overall operational performance and reliability of coal gasifiers.
Temperature
Stress/strain within refractory liner
Spallation events
Refractory liner health
Monitoring interior thermochemical conditions allows for efficient
control of the gasification process.
4/27/2016
Technology Vision:
Item A represents the smart
refractory material.
Item B is an interconnection
(alignment) pin.
Item C is an interconnection brick,
which will permit transfer of the
signal to the exterior wall.
Item D is the sealed electrical
access port to connect to the
signal acquisition/processing units.
Item E is low-power electronics
and wireless communication.
4/27/2016
Program Objectives:
1) Investigate chemical stability, thermomechanical properties, and electrical
properties of refractory ceramic composites at temperatures between 7501450C.
2) Define processes to pattern and embed the conductive ceramic composites
within refractory materials to incorporate temperature and strain/stress
sensors into refractory bricks.
3) Develop methods to interface the electrical sensing outputs from the smart
refractory with an embedded processor and to design a wireless sensor
network to efficiently collect the data at a processing unit for further data
analysis.
4) Develop algorithms for model-based estimation of temperature profile in the
refractory, slag penetration depth, spallation thickness, and resultant health
by using the data from the wireless sensor network.
4/27/2016
Task Assignments:
Task 2: Fabrication and Characterization of
Oxide-Silicide Composites.
Task 3 and Task 4: Sensor Patterning and
Embedding and Static and Dynamic Sensor
Testing.
Task 5: Data Ex-Filtration Using a Wireless
Sensor Network.
Task 6: Model-Based Estimation of Refractory
Degradation/Temperature.
4/27/2016
Task 2:
Fabrication and Characterization of
Oxide-Silicide Composites.
(Sabolsky)
4/27/2016
Task 2.0 Objectives:
Investigate chemical stability, thermomechanical
properties, and electrical properties of refractory
silicide-oxide composites at temperatures between
750-1450C.
4/27/2016
Silicide/Oxide Stability (XRD):
* Prepared via mixed oxide route followed by sintering in Argon atmosphere at 1400-1600C.
Al2O3
Y2O3
ZrO2
Cr2O3
MoSi2
MoSi2, Al2O3, Mo5Si3,
SiO2
MoSi2, Y2O3, SiO2,
Y5Mo2O12, Mo3Si, Mo3O
MoSi2, ZrO2, Mo5Si3
MoSi2, Cr2O3,
Cr3Mo, SiO2
WSi2
WSi2, Al2O3, W5Si3
WSi2, Y2SiO5, WO2, SiO2
WSi2, ZrO2, W5Si3
WSi2, Cr2O3, SiO2, W3O
ZrSi2
ZrSi2, Al2O3, ZrO2, SiO2
ZrSi2, Y2O3, Y2Si2O7, SiO2
ZrSi2, ZrO2, SiO2
ZrSi2, Cr2O3, ZrSiO4,
Cr3O, SiO2
TaSi2
TaSi2, Al2O3, Ta5Si3,
Ta3Si, SiO2
TaSi2, Y2SiO5, Ta2O5,
Y10Ta4O25
TaSi2, ZrO2, Ta5Si3, SiO2
TaSi2, Cr2O3, CrTaO4,
Ta2O5, TaO2
NbSi2
NbSi2, Al2O3, Nb5Si3
NbSi2, Y2O3, Y2SiO5,
Nb5Si3, SiO2
NbSi2, ZrO2, Nb5Si3, SiO2
NbSi2, Cr2O3, Nb5Si3,
CrNbO4, CrNbSi, SiO2
TiSi2
TiSi2, Al2O3, Ti5Si3, SiO2
TiSi2, Y2O3, Y2Si2O7,
TiO2, SiO2
TiSi2, ZrO2, TiO2, SiO2
(Cr0.88Ti0.12)2O3,
Cr3Si, SiO2
CrSi2
CrSi2, Al2O3, Cr5Si3
CrSi2, Y2O3, Y2SiO5
CrSi2, ZrO2
CrSi2, Cr2O3, Cr3Si, SiO2
Metal silicides show high stability in Al2O3 and ZrO2 matrix only with formation of different type
of silicides (Mo5Si3, W5Si3, Ta5Si3, Nb5Si3, Cr5Si3) and SiO2 (highlighted).
They partially react with Y2O3 and Cr2O3 to form undesired secondary phases.
4/27/2016
10
Silicide/Oxide Microstructure (SEM):
(60-40) vol% MoSi2-Al2O3
(60-40) vol% MoSi2-Y2O3
20 m
(60-40) vol% WSi2-Al2O3
10 m
(60-40) vol% WSi2-Y2O3
(60-40) vol% MoSi2-ZrO2
3 m
(60-40) vol% WSi2-ZrO2
20 m
Secondary Phase
10 m
1 m
4/27/2016
Chemically etched in [Link] HCl:HNO3:H2O
11
3 m
Silicide/Oxide Properties:
CTE (100-1000C)
4-point DC Conductivity (100-1000C)
4
10
12.0
MoSi2-Al2O3 composites
10.0
9.5
9.0
8.5
30
40
50
60
70
10
10
10
80
(75-25) vol% MoSi2-ZrO2
10
~ 9.65x10-6K-1
20
Volume Percentage of MoSi2
MoSi2-based composites
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
10
WSi2-Al2O3 composites
10
10
10
(60-40) vol% TiSi2-Al2O3
Silicide/Al2O3 composites
0
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
MoSi2-Al2O3
at ~ 1000C
(S/cm)
WSi2-Al2O3
MoSi2-coarseAl2O3
Conductivity (S/cm)
-6 -1
Alpha (10 K )
11.0
10.5
10.0
9.5
9.0
8.5
~ 9.41x10-6K-1
8.0
7.5
(60-40) vol% TaSi2-Al2O3
10
Temperature (C)
Temperature (C)
12.0
11.5
(60-40) vol% WSi2-Al2O3
Conductivity (S/cm)
10.5
7.5
(60-40) vol% MoSi2-Al2O3
(60-40) vol% MoSi2-ZrO2
11.0
8.0
(60-40) vol% MoSi2-Al2O3
Conductivity (S/cm)
-6 -1
Alpha (10 K )
11.5
10
(20-80) vol% MoSi2-Al2O3
20
30
40
50
60
70
Volume Percentage of WSi2 (%)
80
10
TaSi2-Al2O3
TiSi2-Al2O3
MoSi2-ZrO2
WSi2-ZrO2
CrSi2-Cr2O3
10
10
60/40 vol%
MoSi2-Al2O3
43.6
WSi2-Al2O3
26.7
WSi2-ZrO2
20.7
MoSi2-c.Al2O3
20.5
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Temperature (C)
Key Parameters: (1) metal silicide type and fraction, (2) mixedness or level of homogeneity, (3)
relative density, and (4) particle size of the metal silicide and refractory oxide.
4/27/2016
12
Long-Term Stability of the Composites:
Thermal Stability (1400C)
Grain Growth Kinetics (1400-1600C)
MoSi2-Al2O3 composite
30000
27000
(60-40) vol% MoSi2-coarseAl2O3
(60-40) vol% MoSi2-ZrO2
12
18000
10
24 hrs
15000
12000
9000
3000
0
20
30
40
50
60
2 ()
70
: MoSi2 : ZrO2 : Mo5Si3
48 hrs
27000
24000
21000
24 hrs
18000
15000
12000
9000
6000
3000
20
30
Sintered
40
4/27/2016
50
60
2 ()
70
Precursor
MoSi2 Powder
90
MoSi2-ZrO2 composite
30000
80
80
Sintered
After annealing
Intensity (a.u.)
(60-40) vol% MoSi2-Al2O3
14
21000
6000
Intensity (a.u.)
18
16
48 hrs
24000
Pure MoSi2
MoSi2 Grain Size (m)
: MoSi2 : Al2O3 : Mo5Si3
20
90
Pure MoSi2
After Sintering
(1600C - 2h)
After Annealing
(1400C - 24h)
MoSi2-Al2O3
5 m
1 m
Silicide/Al2O3 and silicide/ZrO2 composites are highly
stable at 1400C (up to 48 hrs).
Refractory oxides successfully retard the grain growth.
13
Task 2 Conclusions and Future Work:
Metal silicides show high stability in Al2O3 and ZrO2 matrix
(with occasional formation of sub-silicides).
Electrical conductivity of composites characterized with
various silicide content consistent performance transferred
to sensor design and fabrication task.
Future Work:
Alternative materials and designs (layered structure) will
be investigated to prevent the reaction between
silicide/oxide composites and Cr2O3.
Process parameters will be optimized by correlating the
degree of distribution (D index) with the physical
properties of the composites (conductivity) at high
temperatures.
4/27/2016
14
Task 3: Sensor Patterning and
Embedding.(Sabolsky/HWI)
Task 4: Static and Dynamic Sensor Testing
of Smart Refractory Specimens.
(Sabolsky/HWI)
*US Provisional Patent Number 61/941,159
4/27/2016
15
Task 3 Objectives:
To develop methods for patterning technology the ceramic
composites within the refractory matrix.
Task 4 Objectives:
To test the electrical performance of the smart refractory
brick (with embedded thermocouple or thermistor sensors).
To investigate corrosion/erosion kinetics in static and
dynamic tests on smaller prototype and full-size smart cups
and bricks (at WVU and HWI).
To implement and test methods for data collection on initial
prototypes.
4/27/2016
16
Smart Refractory Fabrication:
General Smart Refractory Processing Method
Examples of Sensor Preforms
4/27/2016
17
Thermoelectric Voltage (mV)
High-Temperature Thermocouple
Performance:
WSi2// TaSi2
32
MoSi2// WSi2
MoSi2// NbSi2
24
MoSi2// TiSi3
16
9
8
0
0
400
800
1200
1600
Temperature (C)
Various thermocouple
compositions studied
at 1500 C
90 vol% silicide and 10 vol% oxide
The thermocouple with composition MoSi2 //TiSi2 exhibited 34 mV at 1400 C
4/27/2016
18
Long Thermocouple Preforms:
1st cycle
2nd cycle
10
1500
1350 C
8.3 mV
Temperature (C)
1200
1350 C
8.43 mV
5h
9
8
10 h
1050
900
6
5
750
600
450
300
150
Thermoelectric Voltage (mV)
1350
-1
0
12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63 66
Time (hours)
Long Thermocouple: [75-25] Vol% MoSi2-Al2O3//[75-25] Vol% WSi2-Al2O3
laminated between alumina substrates and sintered at 1500 C, 2h in argon
and tested isothermally at 1350 C for 2 cycles in argon atmosphere
Temp. C
Experiment
Hold Time, h
EMF, mV
1350
Cycle # 1
8.3
1350
Cycle # 2
10
8.43
4/27/2016
19
TC: [75-25] Vol% MoSi2Al2O3// WSi2-Al2O3
Smart Refractory Microstructure:
Sensor embedded
Cr2O3 refractory
brick
Monoliths of sensors were fabricated via tape casting, laminated and sintered
at 1500 C. These laminates were embedded in the Cr2O3 brick while slip
casting and co-sintered at 1500 C in Argon atmosphere.
4/27/2016
20
Embedded Thermocouple: Smart Chromia Brick
Sensor preform embedded
HWI high-chromia
formulation.
Long TC embedded Chromia Refractory Brick
Sensor embedded below
opening to insert slag
composition for corrosion
testing.
Thin Embedded TC Sensor
Interfaced Smart Brick
Testing Smart Refractory Brick
4/27/2016
21
Embedded Thermistor: Smart Chromia Brick
4.0
1350 C
Resistance ( )
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
-10
30
70
110
150
190
230
270
Time (Hours)
Performance of thermistor [60-40] vol% MoSi2-Al2O3
Thermistor embedded smart brick in the
testing furnace
The temperature sensor (thermistor) with composition (60-40) vol%
MoSi2-Al2O3 embedded within the Cr2O3 refractory exhibited stable
behavior for more than 250 hours at 1350 C in argon atmosphere.
4/27/2016
22
Static and Dynamic Corrosion Tests:
(Currently On-going)
(a)
Sintered sensor preform
Lignite Coal
(b)
(c)
Brick loaded with coal
Biscuit fired coal samples
Various steps involved in the testing of smart refractory brick embedded
with [90-10] MoSi2-Al2O3 thermistor and tested at 1350 C , 2h in Argon
Lignite Coal Slag 44.3SiO2-5.26Fe2O3-17.5CaO-6.64MgO
4/27/2016
23
Current Issue: Brick Interconnection
Ag wire leads
Smart brick
K-Type Thermocouple
Loss of electrical connection to bricks during testing.
Metal lead delamination due to wetting limitations.
Phase oxide formation in locations that are not embedded causing
drift in response.
Efforts are focusing on better understanding the issue and
developing the proper ceramic and/or metal connections.
4/27/2016
24
Task 3 and 4 Conclusions and Future Work:
All-ceramic thermocouple and thermistor preforms were
fabricated and successfully tested.
Smart high-chromia bricks were fabricated in collaboration
with HWI (both thermistors and thermocouples), and currently
going under test.
Future Work:
Optimize method to interconnect to embedded sensors (in
order to stabilize sensor signal and sensor long-term response).
Investigate the corrosion/erosion kinetics of sensor embedded
refractory bricks in static and dynamic mode with slag.
Scale-up all sensor preforms and smart refractory brick for
FULL-TECHNOLOGY DEMO IN TASK 7.
4/27/2016
25
Task 5:
Data Ex-Filtration Using a Wireless
Sensor Network.
(Graham/Kulathumani)
4/27/2016
26
Task 5 Objectives:
To develop methods to interface the electrical
sensing outputs from the smart refractory with an
embedded processor
To design a wireless sensor network to efficiently
collect the data at a processing unit for further data
analysis
Energy
Harvester
Sensor
4/27/2016
Interface
Circuit
WSN
Mote
27
Radio
Base
Station
Electronics interfacing Approach:
Aim: To reliably collect data from the sensors embedded within
the smart bricks and interface them to wireless sensor nodes for
communication
Approach:
(i) Iterative approach to sensor interface circuitry in parallel with
the sensor development
a)
b)
Initial sensor interface circuitry using off-the-shelf circuitry
Move to integrated circuits for lower-power and more compact
solutions
(ii) Investigate energy harvesting using thermoelectric devices to
help power the sensor motes and interface circuitry
4/27/2016
28
Custom Integrated Circuit:
2
3
5
1. Cold-Junction Compensator
2. Thermocouple Amplifier
3. Capacitive Sensor
4. Thermocouple Amplifier V2
5. Wheat-Stone Bridge
Bridge Circuit Temperature vs Actual Temperature
120
Resistance-Based Sensor
110
Within 2% accuracy
100
Temperature(C)
90
80
70
60
50
40
Measured
Ideal
30
20
20
4/27/2016
29
30
40
50
60
70
80
Temperature(C)
90
100
110
120
Circuits for Thermocouple-Based Sensors:
Compensates for measurement
error at thermocouple cold
junction
Adds offset to thermocouple
input to allow for the correct
temperature measurement
Greatly improves accuracy over
a large range of temperature
values
TC Amplifier with CJC Offset
Percent Error vs Temperature
5
1500
4
3
1
Error(%)
Temperature(C)
2
1000
0
-1
500
-2
-3
Measured
Ideal
500
1000
Temperature(C)
4/27/2016
30
-4
1500
-5
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
Temperature(C)
1300
1400
1500
Circuits for Energy Harvesting:
Start-up Sequence
Leverages COTS-based DC/DC converter
circuit (LTC3108)
Start-up Sequence shows the output of
Thermoelectric Generator, LDO Regulator,
Storage Buffer, and VOUT.
The Mote Experiment was done using a
TelosB. The results shown are 10 minutes
into the test. Once a minute, the TelosB
turned on and was powered by the energy
harvesting system for a 5 second radio
transmission.
VOUT System Output
Storage Buffer Energy Storage Output
LDO Regulator Internal Regulator Output
TEG Thermoelectric Generator Output
4/27/2016
31
Mote Experiment: Testing Results
Wireless sensor network overview:
Sensor
1
Sensor
2
Data In
Command
Out
Base Station
Desktop/Laptop
Sensor
3
Master
Mote
Sensor
4
Collect refractory sensor data over wireless medium
(data ex-filtration)
Enable remote configuration of parameters
(over-the-air programming)
4/27/2016
32
Assembled complete signal chain:
Smart bricks with embedded sensors were interfaced with
a wireless mote yielding a complete signal chain
comprising
the smart brick,
resistance measurement / amplifier circuit,
and wireless data transmission.
4/27/2016
33
Verified wireless signal chain performance:
5
LabView Full Run
x 10
LabView Half Run
200
Resistance( )
Resistance( )
3
2
1
0
0
10
15
Time(h)
WSN Full Run
20
150
100
50
0
25
6
8
Time(h)
WSN Half Run
10
12
10
12
200
Resistance( )
Output(V)
3
2
1
0
0
10
15
Time(h)
20
150
100
50
0
25
6
Time(h)
Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) data collected from smart
bricks by measuring voltage from ICs [bottom figure]
Resistance measured directly on Labview by connecting an
ADC probe [top figure]
Figures show similar trend, thus verifying correctness of
the wireless network based data collection
4/27/2016
34
Results on increasing scale of network:
Tested ability of sensor network protocol to handle larger
network sizes
Evaluated sizes from 40-200 using a ns-3, a network
simulator
Customized collection tree protocol to periodic data
collection scenario
100% data reliability
Latency and message size grow linearly with network size
4/27/2016
35
Task 5 Conclusions and Future Work:
The end to end signal chain for data collection system has been
implemented and tested using actual smart brick prototypes
Sensors are interfaced with microcontroller + radio (motes)
Data collection protocol has been implemented
Visualization and sensor control interfaces have been
implemented
Scalability of network protocol was evaluated
Refinements to interface circuits to suit updated sensors
Model based data reduction techniques are being explored
This can help reduce data rate without compromising with
information required for analyzing system characteristics.
4/27/2016
36
Task 6.0:
Model-Based Estimation of
Temperature Profile and Extent of
Refractory Degradation.
(Bhattacharyya, Huang)
4/27/2016
37
Task 6 Objectives:
To develop algorithms for model-based estimation of
temperature profile in the refractory, slag
penetration depth, spallation thickness, and
resultant health by using the data from the wireless
sensor network
4/27/2016
38
Motivation:
Typical correlation based approaches are inadequate
Stiff temperature gradient along the refractory
resulting in a large temperature change along the
sensor length
Change in thermal and electrical properties over time
due to slag penetration
4/27/2016
39
Property Models:
In order to build the model of smart refractory , several
temperature-dependent property models for refractory
or sensor material are needed:
The electrical resistivity model for refractory*
Specific heat
Emissivity
Thermal conductivity
Electrical conductivity
Thermal expansion
Dielectric constant
Youngs modulus
Poissons ratio
*Hensler J R, Henry E C. Electrical Resistance of Some Refractory Oxides and Their Mixtures in the
Temperature Range 600 to 1500 C[J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1953, 36(3): 76-83
4/27/2016
40
Property Models for Composite:
The properties of refractory will change as the slag
penetrates into the wall. These models can be used
to predict the effective properties of a special kind of
composite(slag and the refractory).
Specific heat
Thermal conductivity
Dielectric constant
4/27/2016
41
Thermal Model of a Gasifier Wall:
2-D heat conduct equation was used:
1
4/27/2016
42
Slag Penetration Model:
Velocity of capillary flow through the horizontal pores (Washburn, 1921)
Corrected by porosity and tortuosity of the refractory pore system.
(Williford et al., 2008)
Velocity of slag penetration
decreases quickly
Temperature gradient
Williford, R. E.; Johnson, K. I.; Sundaram, S. K.; Pilli, S. Effective diffusivity and spalling models
for slagging coal gasifiers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008b, 91, 4016-4022.
4/27/2016
43
Sensor Models:
Resistive
circuit
sensor
Five different types of sensors:
Thermistor or
thermocouple
Interdigital capacitor (IDC)
Strain gauge
Resistive circuit
Thermistor
Strain
gauge
thermocouple
4/27/2016
44
Interdigital
capacitor
Interdigital Capacitor (IDC) Sensor Model:
Sensitivity to slag penetration
Composite property
model
Slag can only fill the
pores
5.00E-12
Capacitance (F)
4.80E-12
4.60E-12
0 vol% slag
5 vol% slag
10 vol% slag
4.40E-12
15 vol% slag
20 vol% slag
4.20E-12
4.00E-12
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
Distance (m)
* Igreja R, Dias C J. Analytical evaluation of the interdigital electrodes capacitance for a
multi-layered structure[J]. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2004, 112(2): 291-301.
4/27/2016
45
Estimation:
Methods:
Traditional Kalman Filter (TKF)
Linear process model
Computationally cheap
Less accuracy for highly nonlinear process
Extended Kalman Filter (EKF)
Nonlinear process linearized at every time step
Computationally costlier than TKF
Higher accuracy than TKF for nonlinear process
Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF)
Nonlinear process
Computationally expensive
Superior accuracy
4/27/2016
58
46
Filter Algorithm:
Differential Algebraic Equations System
Nonlinear differential algebraic equations (DAE) system:
,
Developed approach for handling the DAE System:
Linearized process model:
Augmented form:
4/27/2016
59
47
Estimation of Temperature Using EKF:
Assume five IDC sensors are embedded
diagonally in the refractory brick.
Estimation of capacitance
Temperature Estimation for Different
Extent of Slag Penetration are completed
4/27/2016
48
Estimations of Temperature Using UKF:
Assuming five IDC
sensors are embedded
diagonally in the
refractory brick
4/27/2016
61
Estimations of Extent of Slag Penetration
Using UKF:
Temperature is assumed
to be under the normal
operating conditions
4/27/2016
50
Task 6 Conclusions and Future Work:
Nonlinear filtering algorithms have been developed
to estimate temperature and the extent of slag
penetration. The filters have been tested by using the
data from the model of gasifier wall.
Future work will focus on validation and testing of
developed models and filtering algorithms using
experimental data.
4/27/2016
51
Products:
1. Edward M. Sabolsky, R. Chockalingam, K. Sabolsky, G. A. Yakaboylu, O. Ozmena, B. Armour,
A. Teter, D. Bhattacharyya , David Graham , Vinod Kulathumani, Close Timothy and Marc
Palmisiano, Refractory Ceramic Sensors for Process and Health Monitoring of Slagging
Gasifiers, 227th ECS Meeting- Chicago, Illinois, USA, May 28th, (2015).
2. Edward M. Sabolsky , R. Chockalingam, K. Sabolsky, G. A. Yakaboylu, O. Ozmen, B. Armour,
A. Teter, D. Bhattacharyya, David Graham, Vinod Kulathumani, Close Timothy and Marc
Palmisiano, Conductive Ceramic Composites Used to Fabricate Embedded Sensors for
Monitoring the Temperature and Health of Refractory Brick in Slagging Gasifiers, XIVth
International Conference European Ceramic Society- Toledo, Espana 24th June, 2015
3. R. C. Pillai, E. Sabolsky, K. Sabolsky, G. Yakaboylu, B. Armour, J. Mayer, J. Bogan, M.
Raughley and J. Sayre Performance of high temperature ceramic-ceramic thermocouples
embedded within chromia refractory bricks to monitor the health and stability of industrial
gasifiers Materials Science and technology MS&T2015, Oct 4-8, 2015, Greater Columbus
Conventional Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
4. G. Yakaboylu, R. C. Pillai, B. Armour, K. Sabolsky, E. Sabolsky,Development of Refractory
Oxide/Metal Silicide Composites for High Temperature Harsh-Environment Sensor
Applications,Materials Science and technology MS&T2015, Oct 4-8, 2015, Greater Columbus
Conventional Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
5. G.A. Yakaboylu, R. C. Pillai, B. Armour, K. Sabolsky and E. M. Sabolsky, Conductive
Ceramic Composites for Fabricating High Temperature and Harsh Environment Sensors:
Thermal Processing, Stability and Properties, International Conference and Exposition on
Advanced Ceramics and Composites, January 24-29, 2016, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA.
4/27/2016
52
Products:
6. R.C. Pillai, G.A. Yakaboylu, K. Sabolsky and E. M. Sabolsky,J. Bogan, J. Sayre,
Composite Ceramic Thermocouples for Harsh-Environment Temperature
Measurements, International Conference and Exposition on Advanced Ceramics and
Composites, January 24-29, 2016, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA.
7. E. M. Sabolsky, R. C. Pillai, K. Sabolsky, G. A. Yakaboylu, B. Armour, A. Teter, M.
Palmisiano and T. Close, Refractory Ceramic Sensors for Process and Health
Monitoring of Slagging Gasifiers, ECS Trans., Vol 66(37) pp 43-53 (2015).
8. B. Rumberg, D. Graham, S. Clites, B. Kelly, M. Navidi, A. Diello, V. Kulathumani,
RAMP: Accelerating Wireless Sensor Design with a Reconfigurable Analog/MixedSignal Platform, Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Information
Processing in Sensor Networks (ISPN15), pp. 47-58, Seattle, WA, April 13-16, 2015.
4/27/2016
53
Appendix:
4/27/2016
54
Thermocouple Microstructures:
Microstructure of ceramic-ceramic thermocouples sintered at 1500 C in argon
The SEM micrographs clearly shows that the thermocouples are fully dense and hence
improves the conductivity
4/27/2016
55
Image Analysis for Distribution (SEM):
Proposed Method: Determination of coefficient of variation as a measure of the degree of
distribution (D index) by measuring distances between all neighboring silicide grains.
,
,
,
1.0
(60-40) vol% WSi2-Y2O3
0.9
(60-40) vol% MoSi2-Al2O3
0.8
0.7
D index
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
5 m
Original image
4/27/2016
0.0
Binary image
56
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
Number of lines analyzed
Silicide Thermocouples:
Seebeck coefficients
Thermoelectric Voltage
T1
T2
T2
T1
E AB = A (T ) dT + B (T ) dT
Absolute Thermoelectric Voltage (mV)
Silicide Couples
30
25
20
(Mo or W)-Ti
(Mo or W)- Ta
15
10
Mo-W
5
0
0
500
1000
Temperature Difference (C)
4/27/2016
S500 (V/C)
Reference
-3.0
T. Nonomura (2011)
-0.3
T. Nonomura (2011)
14
Kenneth Kreider (1995)
20.8
Kenneth Kreider (1995)
-3.3
Kenneth Kreider (1995)
The emf generated between hot junction
J1 and cold junction J2 in material A
35
Mo-Ti
W-Ti
Mo-Ta
W-Ta
Mo-W
Material
MoSi2
WSi2
TaSi2
TiSi2
Pt
1500
B-Type = 8.96 mV at 1400 C
(Mo or W)- Ti silicide couples
~ 30-34 mV at 1400 C
Mo-W silicide (most
oxidation resistant) resulting
only~ 4mV at 1400 C
CrSi2- based couples would
perform nicely ( = 200
V/K) but melts at 1470 C
Embedded Thermocouple Preform:
Composite
Powders
Dispersant
(Solvents and Dispersants)
Ultrasonic mixing
Tape casted, laminated
and laser cut alumina
green substrates
Screen printing
Curing at 50 C
Sintering at 1500 C for 2 h. in Ar. atmosphere
4/27/2016
58
Organic Binder Vehicle
Ceramic Thermocouple Performance:
(High-temperature measurements)
Thermoelectric Voltage (mV)
25
20
WSi2 // TaSi2
WSi2 // MoSi2
15
MoSi2 // ZrSi2
WSi2 // ZrSi2
10
NbSi2 // MoSi2
TiSi2 // WSi2
5
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Difference in Temperature (C)
Preforms and laminated forms of ceramic
thermocouples heated at 1500 C and
performance is evaluated at 1000 C.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
TiSi2// WSi2 exhibited 20 mV at 800 C
(Type B= 3.15 mV at 800C)
4/27/2016
59
[90-10]WSi2-Al2O3//[90-10]TaSi2-Al2O3
[90-10WSi2-Al2O3//[90-10] MoSi2-Al2O3
[90-10]MoSi2-Al2O3//[90-10] ZrSi2-Al2O3
[90-10]WSi2-Al2O3// [90-10] ZrSi2-Al2O3
[90-10]NbSi2-Al2O3//[90-10] MoSi2-Al2O3
[90-10] TiSi2-Al2O3//[90-10] WSi2-Al2O3
Thermocouple Microstructures:
[90-10] WSi2-Al2O3
Intensity (A.U.)
[90-10] TiSi2-Al2O3
[90-10] TaSi2-Al2O3
[90-10] NbSi2-Al2O3
Al O MoSi
2
20
[90-10] MoSi2-Al2O3
40
60
80
100
Angle 2 (Deg)
120
X-ray analysis of various ceramic-ceramic thermocouples sintered at 1500 C in Ar
4/27/2016
60
Ceramic Testing Stress/Strain Sensors:
Introduce 10% oxygen flow into furnace during burnout of imbedded
sensors to eliminate carbon deposits
Texture substrates in the gripper area to prevent slipping during testing
Amend sensor design to increase Gauge Factor
Evaluate temperature effects on strain sensor
Initiate compressive testing of ceramic strain sensors
V3
V4
V5
V6
V7
(mm)
40
40
40
40
40
(mm)
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.2
(mm)
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
A Sensor length
B Spacing between legs
C Leg width
4/27/2016
Design: V3
61
40.00 mm
0.50 mm
0.50 mm
55.00 mm
40.00 mm
55.00 mm
Design ID
1.00 mm
1.00 mm
Design: V5
Embedded Thermocouples Performance:
Thermoelectric Voltage (mV)
8
38-114-11 Therm o Couple
[90-10] vol% M oSi2 -Al2 O 3 //TaSi2 -Al2 O 3
Pt lead
4
Thermocouple
TC embedded Cr2O3 refractory
brick
0
0
300
600
900
1200
Temperature ( C)
[90-10] vol% MoSi2-Al2O3 // TaSi2-Al2O3
Thermocouple was embedded within the Cr2O3 refractory and was
tested from room temperature to 1200 C in argon atmosphere.
Demonstrated half of predicted voltage, indicating some reaction
or change in junction circuit.
4/27/2016
62
Thermistor Preforms:
MoSi2-Al2O3 based small thermistors
Addition of MoSi2 decreased the resistance of MoSi2-Al2O3 composite thermistors
[50-50] MoSi2-Al2O3 exhibited 786.50 and [90-10] MoSi2-Al2O3 exhibited 10.76
resistance at 1100 C respectively
4/27/2016
63
Static Cup Corrosion Study of Smart Brick:
WSN Data
Lab View Data
1200 C
1100 C
900
1h
25
5h
1h
20
15
600
10
300
0
4
14
280
900
210
Sensor hits the slag
140
300
70
Resistance, k
Temperature, C
1200
0
10
15
1
Data Rail Out Points
20
25
10
12
14
16
18
20
43-11 Brick#10:[60-40]MoSi2-Al2O3 Slag Test - WSN
350
Time, h
1500
43-11 Brick#10:[60-40]MoSi2-Al2O3Run 1 - WSN
19
Time, h
43-11 Brick #10:[60-40] MoSi2-Al2O3 Sensor2: Slag Test
600
Volts(ADC\Resistance)
1200
Volts(ADC\Resistance)
1350 C
Resistance, k
Temperature, C
43-11 Brick # 10: [60-40] MoSi2-Al2O3 Empty Run1
30
1500
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Data Rail Out Points
Sensor hits the slag
30
Time, h
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Time, h
The analytical test results (Lab View) of Brick #10: [60-40] MoSi2-Al2O3 brick were correlated
with wireless data up to 1350 C isothermal hold and thereafter the data showed deviations.
This may be due to oxidation.
4/27/2016
64