pgsql-hackers since 2010-08-05 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Aug. 5, 2010

Thread Author Time
Re: Using Small Size SSDs to improve performance? Josh Berkus 00:43
Re: Using Small Size SSDs to improve performance? Greg Smith 00:49
Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Greg Stark 00:50
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Greg Stark 01:05
Re: more numeric stuff Robert Haas 01:27
Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Robert Haas 01:31
Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Robert Haas 01:32
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Greg Stark 01:35
Re: Using Small Size SSDs to improve performance? Robert Haas 02:00
Re: documentation for committing with git Daniel Farina 02:08
Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Tom Lane 02:31
Re: Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 02:37
Re: documentation for committing with git Andrew Dunstan 03:03
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Alvaro Herrera 03:29
Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Merlin Moncure 03:46
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Pavel Stehule 04:18
Re: GROUPING SETS revisited Pavel Stehule 04:21
Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding XMLEXISTS to the grammar Peter Eisentraut 04:23
Re: GROUPING SETS revisited Joshua Tolley 05:20
shared_preload_libraries is ignored in single user mode KaiGai Kohei 06:08
Re: MERGE Specification 📎 Simon Riggs 07:46
Re: MERGE Specification Heikki Linnakangas 09:29
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Greg Stark 09:29
Re: documentation for committing with git Heikki Linnakangas 09:35
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Thom Brown 09:39
Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname Michael Meskes 09:39
Re: documentation for committing with git Heikki Linnakangas 09:43
Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Yeb Havinga 10:15
Re: Review of Synchronous Replication patches Fujii Masao 10:26
Re: Synchronous replication 📎 Fujii Masao 10:40
Re: MERGE Specification 📎 Simon Riggs 11:25
Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Robert Haas 11:26
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Hitesh Bhambhani 11:55
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Hitesh Bhambhani 12:04
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Greg Stark 12:24
Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Richard 13:19
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Richard 13:20
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Andrew Dunstan 13:40
Re: ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname Kevin Grittner 13:44
Re: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Richard 13:50
Re: MERGE Specification Boxuan Zhai 13:55
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Kevin Grittner 13:56
pg_stat_user_functions' notion of user Peter Eisentraut 13:58
Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Tom Lane 13:59
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Tom Lane 14:04
Re: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Robert Haas 14:07
Re: TwoPO: experimental join order algorithm Adriano Lange 14:08
Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Robert Haas 14:10
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Richard 14:13
Re: pg_stat_user_functions' notion of user David Fetter 14:13
Re: Synchronous replication Fujii Masao 14:14
Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup cause boot failure,anyone know why? Richard 14:20
Re: MERGE Specification David Fetter 14:20
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Richard 14:21
Re: MERGE Specification Simon Riggs 14:22
Re: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup cause boot failure,anyone know why? Robert Haas 14:38
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Tom Lane 14:41
Re: ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname Boszormenyi Zoltan 14:41
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Tom Lane 14:44
Re: GROUPING SETS revisited 📎 Pavel Stehule 14:46
Re: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup cause bootfailure,anyone know why? Richard 14:51
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Richard 14:54
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Richard 14:56
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Pavel Stehule 14:57
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Tom Lane 15:06
Re: GROUPING SETS revisited Joshua Tolley 15:12
Re: MERGE Specification Heikki Linnakangas 15:17
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Heikki Linnakangas 15:21
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Tom Lane 15:25
Re: GROUPING SETS revisited Pavel Stehule 15:29
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Pavel Stehule 15:31
Re: MERGE Specification Simon Riggs 15:35
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Richard 15:38
Re: MERGE Specification Robert Haas 15:40
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Thom Brown 15:40
Re: Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Nicolas Barbier 15:43
Concurrent MERGE Simon Riggs 15:43
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Tom Lane 15:47
Re: MERGE Specification Merlin Moncure 15:47
Re: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup cause boot failure, anyone know why? Richard 15:50
Re: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname Alvaro Herrera 15:55
Re: Concurrent MERGE Robert Haas 15:57
Re: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname Boszormenyi Zoltan 16:24
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Alvaro Herrera 16:28
Re: Needs Suggestion Tom Lane 16:33
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Tom Lane 16:36
Re: Concurrent MERGE Heikki Linnakangas 16:39
Re: Concurrent MERGE Heikki Linnakangas 16:43
Re: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname Tom Lane 16:45
Re: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup cause boot failure,anyone know why? Andrew Dunstan 16:47
pgsql-hackers@news.hub.org 37% OFF on Pfizer! pgsql-hackers 16:54
pgsql-hackers@news.hub.org 50% OFF on Pfizer! pgsql-hackers 16:55
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Alvaro Herrera 16:57
Re: Concurrent MERGE Kevin Grittner 16:57
Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Chris Browne 16:59
Re: Concurrent MERGE Chris Browne 17:10
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Tom Lane 17:19
Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Merlin Moncure 17:26
Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Tom Lane 17:28
Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by Pavel Stehule 17:30
Re: Concurrent MERGE Kevin Grittner 17:31
Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Chris Browne 17:35
Re: Concurrent MERGE Josh Berkus 17:36
Re: Concurrent MERGE Kevin Grittner 17:40
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Alvaro Herrera 17:41
remove upsert example from docs 📎 Merlin Moncure 17:44
Re: Performance Enhancement/Fix for Array Utility Functions Kevin Grittner 17:52
Re: pg_stat_user_functions' notion of user Josh Berkus 17:58
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Tom Lane 18:01
Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Robert Haas 18:02
Re: remove upsert example from docs Kevin Grittner 18:03
Re: Performance Enhancement/Fix for Array Utility Functions Mike Lewis 18:06
Re: remove upsert example from docs Greg Sabino Mullane 18:06
Re: remove upsert example from docs Tom Lane 18:09
Re: remove upsert example from docs Andrew Dunstan 18:24
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 18:25
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Alvaro Herrera 18:28
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Peter Eisentraut 18:32
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 18:38
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) David E. Wheeler 18:39
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Thom Brown 18:42
CommitFest 2010-07 week three progress report Kevin Grittner 18:42
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Alex Hunsaker 18:43
Re: remove upsert example from docs Merlin Moncure 18:44
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 18:45
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) David E. Wheeler 18:47
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) David E. Wheeler 18:47
Re: remove upsert example from docs Tom Lane 18:53
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Josh Berkus 18:59
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 19:16
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Robert Haas 19:18
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) David E. Wheeler 19:20
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 19:23
Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Josh Berkus 19:27
Re: Concurrent MERGE Kevin Grittner 19:33
Re: Concurrent MERGE Josh Berkus 19:45
Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 19:50
Re: Concurrent MERGE Kevin Grittner 20:07
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Heikki Linnakangas 20:08
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Tom Lane 20:29
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Peter Eisentraut 20:31
Re: Concurrent MERGE Josh Berkus 20:37
PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown Heikki Linnakangas 20:48
Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown Pavel Stehule 20:56
Re: Concurrent MERGE Kevin Grittner 20:59
Re: [HACKERS] Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane 21:02
Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown Tom Lane 21:11
Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown Andrew Dunstan 21:31
Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output 📎 Florian Pflug 22:05
Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown Tom Lane 22:13
Re: Concurrent MERGE Josh Berkus 22:16
Re: Concurrent MERGE Tom Lane 22:41
Re: Concurrent MERGE Josh Berkus 22:49
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Mike Fowler 22:56
Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Tom Lane 23:05
Re: Concurrent MERGE Mark Kirkwood 23:06
Re: Concurrent MERGE Andres Freund 23:07
Re: Concurrent MERGE Tom Lane 23:08
Re: Concurrent MERGE Josh Berkus 23:24

Aug. 6, 2010

Thread Author Time
Re: MERGE Specification Boxuan Zhai 01:39
LockDatabaseObject vs. LockSharedObject Robert Haas 02:11
Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding xpath_exists function Alvaro Herrera 02:29
Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues Greg Stark 02:44
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 03:11
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Andrew Dunstan 03:37
pgsql-hackers@news.hub.org 81% OFF on Pfizer! pgsql-hackers 03:44
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 03:57
Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function Peter Eisentraut 04:38
pgsql-hackers@news.hub.org 21% OFF on Pfizer! pgsql-hackers 06:15
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch David Fetter 06:18
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Pavel Stehule 06:29
Re: MERGE Specification Heikki Linnakangas 07:03
Re: MERGE Specification Simon Riggs 07:12
Re: MERGE Specification Heikki Linnakangas 07:28
Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown 📎 Heikki Linnakangas 07:36
Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown 📎 Heikki Linnakangas 07:40
Re: MERGE Specification Simon Riggs 07:41
Re: Concurrent MERGE Simon Riggs 07:42
Re: Proposal / proof of concept: Triggers on VIEWs Dean Rasheed 07:49
Re: MERGE Specification Simon Riggs 07:53
Re: Proposal / proof of concept: Triggers on VIEWs Naveed Alam 07:56
Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function Mike Fowler 08:04
Re: MERGE Specification Boxuan Zhai 08:23
Re: MERGE Specification Boxuan Zhai 08:26
Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Mike Fowler 08:28
Re: MERGE Specification Simon Riggs 08:51
Moderator on Committers? Simon Riggs 09:40
Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Robert Haas 11:31
default of max_stack_depth Fujii Masao 12:54
postgres 9.0 crash when bringing up hot standby Alanoly Andrews 13:10
Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Mike Fowler 13:43
Re: default of max_stack_depth Tom Lane 14:02
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Andrew Dunstan 14:08
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch Mike Fowler 14:12
Re: default of max_stack_depth Fujii Masao 14:22
Re: postgres 9.0 crash when bringing up hot standby Fujii Masao 14:31
Re: CommitFest 2010-07 week three progress report Kevin Grittner 14:31
BUG #5607: memmory leak in ecpg Marcelo Mas 14:39
Re: default of max_stack_depth Tom Lane 14:53
refactoring comment.c 📎 Robert Haas 15:02

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31