pgsql-bugs since 2016-05-28 00:00

If you find a bug, please use the bug reporting form.

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

May 28, 2016

Thread Author Time
ram consumption Petar Djurkovic 09:26
BUG #14161: reverse index scan cann't use double link? digoal 09:52
BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates dmigowski 13:52
Re: BUG #14161: reverse index scan cann't use double link? Tom Lane 15:03
Re: BUG #14161: reverse index scan cann't use double link? 德哥 15:59
BUG #14163: Index only scan Buffer read enlarged when the data is random digoal 16:09
Re: ram consumption Tom Lane 16:52
Re: ram consumption Petar Djurkovic 17:18
Re: ram consumption Gavin Flower 22:16
Re: ram consumption Petar Djurkovic 23:17

May 29, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: ram consumption Gavin Flower 00:50
Re: ram consumption Francisco Olarte 09:03
Re: ram consumption Mark Kirkwood 10:36

May 30, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates Michael Paquier 03:53
Re: BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates Daniel Migowski 07:56
BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow kes-kes 08:50
BUG #14165: jdbc driver version 9.4 mtmayr 14:02
Re: BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow Tom Lane 17:10
Re: BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow David G. Johnston 18:02
Re: BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow KES 18:28
Re: BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow Tom Lane 19:01
Re: BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow David G. Johnston 19:55
Re: BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow David G. Johnston 20:05
Re: BUG #14134: segmentation fault with large table with gist index 📎 Peter Geoghegan 21:00

May 31, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates Michael Paquier 04:56
Re: BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates Daniel Migowski 05:47
BUG #14166: JDBC driver won't parse error message from DB server in German davygora 14:32

June 1, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14166: JDBC driver won't parse error message from DB server in German Michael Paquier 00:23
Re: BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates Andrew Gierth 02:16
BUG #14167: ecpg parser cann't ignore code in #ifdef ? digoal 03:33
Re: BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates Daniel Migowski 04:46
BUG #14168: ALTER TABLE SET LOGGED failing ganesh.kannan 04:57
BUG #14169: Incorrect merge join result in 9.5 yancya 06:59
Re: BUG #14168: ALTER TABLE SET LOGGED failing David Gould 07:06
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14166: JDBC driver won't parse error message from DB server in German Davygora, Yuriy 08:20
Re: BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Michael Paquier 08:26
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14166: JDBC driver won't parse error message from DB server in German Dave Cramer 11:09
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14166: JDBC driver won't parse error message from DB server in German Vladimir Sitnikov 11:23
BUG #14170: error message in case LOCALE de_DE.UTF8 is used in combination with CLIENT_ENCODING=LATIN1 dag-hammerich 12:06
Re: BUG #14167: ecpg parser cann't ignore code in #ifdef ? Michael Meskes 13:43
BUG #14171: Wrong FSM file after switching hot standby to master timofeid 13:48
Re: BUG #14169: Incorrect merge join result in 9.5 David G. Johnston 14:20
Re: BUG #14169: Incorrect merge join result in 9.5 Tom Lane 16:10
Re: BUG #14169: Incorrect merge join result in 9.5 Kevin Grittner 16:15
Re: BUG #14168: ALTER TABLE SET LOGGED failing Ganesh Kannan 16:30

June 2, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14167: ecpg parser cann't ignore code in #ifdef ? 德哥 01:04
Re: BUG #14167: ecpg parser cann't ignore code in #ifdef ? Michael Paquier 01:59
Re: BUG #14171: Wrong FSM file after switching hot standby to master Michael Paquier 07:42
BUG #14172: RPM repository for i386 not working, repomd.xml file is missing. lony.namer 12:32
Re: BUG #14171: Wrong FSM file after switching hot standby to master Andres Freund 14:42
Re: BUG #14169: Incorrect merge join result in 9.5 Kevin Grittner 17:36
Re: BUG #14169: Incorrect merge join result in 9.5 Tom Lane 18:09
Re: BUG #14172: RPM repository for i386 not working, repomd.xml file is missing. Devrim Gündüz 23:09

June 3, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table 📎 Tom Lane 04:03
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Michael Paquier 06:11
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Michael Paquier 06:17
Re: BUG #14171: Wrong FSM file after switching hot standby to master Timofei Dynikov 10:09
BUG #14173: Not using partitions with ANY(ARRAY[...]) furstenheim 10:37
BUG #14174: Expanded-datum bug accessing freed memory andrew 12:46
BUG #14175: RPM Conflicts Origination from pgdg94 james.beck 13:31
Re: BUG #14171: Wrong FSM file after switching hot standby to master Michael Paquier 14:01
Re: BUG #14173: Not using partitions with ANY(ARRAY[...]) Tom Lane 14:22
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Tom Lane 14:25
After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Ganesh Kannan 15:03
BUG #14176: Re: BUG #14173: Not using partitions with ANY(ARRAY[...]) furstenheim 16:14
Re: BUG #14176: Re: BUG #14173: Not using partitions with ANY(ARRAY[...]) Francisco Olarte 16:49
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Tom Lane 17:05
Re: BUG #14174: Expanded-datum bug accessing freed memory Tom Lane 17:25
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Ganesh Kannan 17:29
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Ganesh Kannan 17:31
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Tom Lane 17:40
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Bruce Momjian 17:48
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Ganesh Kannan 18:38
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Ganesh Kannan 20:17
Re: BUG #14174: Expanded-datum bug accessing freed memory Andrew Gierth 20:47
BUG #14177: ARRAYs in VIEWs are inconsistently cast taylor.reece 22:17

June 4, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Jeff Janes 02:43
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Jeff Janes 03:27
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Tom Lane 03:55

June 5, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14134: segmentation fault with large table with gist index Tom Lane 15:54
Re: BUG #14134: segmentation fault with large table with gist index Peter Geoghegan 18:51

June 6, 2016

Thread Author Time
Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all Tomasz Ostrowski 14:25
Re: BUG #14177: ARRAYs in VIEWs are inconsistently cast Amit Langote 14:44
Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all Tom Lane 18:38
Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all 📎 Tom Lane 19:59
Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all Josh berkus 20:23

June 7, 2016

Thread Author Time
BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually ap 01:42
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually 📎 Michael Paquier 02:40
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table 📎 Michael Paquier 05:35
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually Thomas Munro 06:48
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually 📎 Michael Paquier 06:54
BUG #14179: Not enough info in error message dmigowski 07:50
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually Thomas Munro 07:55
BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave boa 09:16
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually Michael Paquier 11:58
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table David G. Johnston 12:21
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table David G. Johnston 12:25
Re: BUG #14179: Not enough info in error message David G. Johnston 12:36
Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error Emiel Hermsen 12:58
Re: Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error Francisco Olarte 13:19
Re: Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error David G. Johnston 13:38
Re: BUG #14179: Not enough info in error message Daniel Migowski 13:39
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Tom Lane 16:23
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table David G. Johnston 16:59
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Tom Lane 17:08
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Andres Freund 17:21
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Bo Ørsted Andresen 17:36
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Andres Freund 17:40
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Bo Ørsted Andresen 17:53
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Andres Freund 17:59
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Bo Ørsted Andresen 18:04
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Andres Freund 18:06
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Tom Lane 18:07
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Bo Ørsted Andresen 18:15
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Andres Freund 18:16
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Bo Ørsted Andresen 18:20
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Bo Ørsted Andresen 18:55
BUG #14181: pg_upgrade: operator family "btree_hstore_ops" does not exist worden.eric 22:05
Re: BUG #14181: pg_upgrade: operator family "btree_hstore_ops" does not exist Tom Lane 22:27

June 8, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave 📎 Bo Ørsted Andresen 00:24
Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all Jim Nasby 00:25
Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple Peter Tripp 01:33
Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple Peter Geoghegan 01:41
Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple Peter Geoghegan 02:00
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Michael Paquier 02:07
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually Michael Paquier 02:59
Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all Tom Lane 03:04
Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple Peter Tripp 04:09
Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple Peter Geoghegan 04:23
Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all Tomasz Ostrowski 06:19
Re: Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error Emiel Hermsen 08:39
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually AP 10:32
Re: Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error Francisco Olarte 10:37
Re: Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error Emiel Hermsen 11:31
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Bo Ørsted Andresen 11:46
Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all Tom Lane 14:04
Re: Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error Tom Lane 14:32
lower integer bound not supported Sandro Santilli 16:08
Re: lower integer bound not supported Alvaro Herrera 16:37
Re: lower integer bound not supported Sandro Santilli 16:43
Fwd: BUG #14181: pg_upgrade: operator family "btree_hstore_ops" does not exist Eric Worden 19:11
BUG #14182: Wrong time stamp exactly at 1996 hour 3 olmozavala 20:37
Re: BUG #14182: Wrong time stamp exactly at 1996 hour 3 John R Pierce 21:39
Re: BUG #14182: Wrong time stamp exactly at 1996 hour 3 John R Pierce 21:50
Re: Fwd: BUG #14181: pg_upgrade: operator family "btree_hstore_ops" does not exist Tom Lane 22:07
Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple Peter Geoghegan 22:37

June 9, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error Francisco Olarte 14:58
Re: Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error David G. Johnston 15:15
PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables hubert depesz lubaczewski 15:46
Re: Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error Francisco Olarte 18:49

June 10, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually 📎 AP 11:06

June 11, 2016

Thread Author Time
BUG #14183: pgAdminIII doesn't display NEGATOR entries dmigowski 09:41

June 12, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14183: pgAdminIII doesn't display NEGATOR entries 📎 Julien Rouhaud 17:58
Re: PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables Jeff Janes 20:50

June 13, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables hubert depesz lubaczewski 09:39
Re: PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables Peter Eisentraut 12:56
Re: PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables hubert depesz lubaczewski 13:22
Re: PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables Tom Lane 13:36
Re: PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables hubert depesz lubaczewski 13:39
BUG #14184: Function is running correct but not showing output zzia88 13:40
BUG #14185: Indentation error in win32.mak let libpq compile fail on USE_OPENSSL=1 -- fix available torben 14:01
Re: PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables Jeff Janes 14:22
Re: BUG #14184: Function is running correct but not showing output Kevin Grittner 15:03
Re: BUG #14184: Function is running correct but not showing output Tom Lane 15:05
Re: BUG #14184: Function is running correct but not showing output Tom Lane 15:25
Re: BUG #14185: Indentation error in win32.mak let libpq compile fail on USE_OPENSSL=1 -- fix available Tom Lane 15:51
Re: PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables hubert depesz lubaczewski 16:14
Re: PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables Jeff Janes 16:27
BUG #14186: Inconsistent code modification petrum 16:31
Re: PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables hubert depesz lubaczewski 16:45
Re: PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables Jeff Janes 17:00
Re: BUG #14186: Inconsistent code modification Tom Lane 17:20
Re: PostgreSQL (9.3 and 9.6) eats all memory when using many tables Tom Lane 18:28
Re: Fwd: BUG #14181: pg_upgrade: operator family "btree_hstore_ops" does not exist Eric Worden 20:32
Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple 📎 Peter Geoghegan 20:45
Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple Peter Geoghegan 21:58
Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple Peter Tripp 23:52

June 14, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #13907: Restore materialized view throw permission denied Michael Paquier 07:16
BUG #14187: Function is running correct but not showing output zzia88 09:07
BUG #14188: "FOR SELECT DISTINCT, ORDER BY expressions must appear IN SELECT list" error and table alias gabrimonfa 09:48
BUG #14189: Corrupted WAL through replication protocol root 10:34
BUG #14190: 'silent_mode=on', 'pg_ctl restart -w' or 'pg_ctl start -w' reports error sideuxb-ky.consultant 10:39
Re: BUG #13907: Restore materialized view throw permission denied Tom Lane 13:29
Re: BUG #14188: "FOR SELECT DISTINCT, ORDER BY expressions must appear IN SELECT list" error and table alias Tom Lane 15:00
Re: BUG #14187: Function is running correct but not showing output David G. Johnston 15:02
Re: BUG #14190: 'silent_mode=on', 'pg_ctl restart -w' or 'pg_ctl start -w' reports error Tom Lane 15:08

June 15, 2016

Thread Author Time
[No subject] cheddici@libero.it 04:38
BUG #14191: plpgsql run infinit when i use bulk query first time digoal 05:47
Re: BUG #13907: Restore materialized view throw permission denied Michael Paquier 07:37
Re: BUG #14188: "FOR SELECT DISTINCT, ORDER BY expressions must appear IN SELECT list" error and table alias Gabriele Monfardini 07:45
Re: pg_dump - wrong order with inheritance Michael Paquier 08:03
BUG #14192: pg_dump/pg_restore omit setting search_path in restored db buschmann 08:27
BUG #14193: cann't modify composite array's element in plpgsql? digoal 09:46
Re: BUG #14192: pg_dump/pg_restore omit setting search_path in restored db Tom Lane 14:16
Re: Joe Conway 14:48
Re: BUG #14192: pg_dump/pg_restore omit setting search_path in restored db David G. Johnston 15:47
Re: BUG #14192: pg_dump/pg_restore omit setting search_path in restored db John R Pierce 15:48
Re: BUG #14192: pg_dump/pg_restore omit setting search_path in restored db Hans Buschmann 15:49
Re: BUG #14192: pg_dump/pg_restore omit setting search_path in restored db David G. Johnston 17:25
Re: BUG #14192: pg_dump/pg_restore omit setting search_path in restored db Hans Buschmann 17:26

Browse Archives

Prev | Next