pgsql-bugs since 2016-05-18 00:00

If you find a bug, please use the bug reporting form.

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

May 18, 2016

Thread Author Time
BUG #14146: Connection refused (0x0000274D/10061 bbabhu 14:34
BUG #14147: Restore of MatView of Foreign Data Table fails lalbin 16:07
BUG #14148: postgres does not support GST timezone ziyun.wang 16:36
Re: BUG #14148: postgres does not support GST timezone Tom Lane 17:24
Re: BUG #14148: postgres does not support GST timezone John R Pierce 17:31
Re: BUG #14148: postgres does not support GST timezone Ziyun Audrey Wang 18:23
Re: BUG #14148: postgres does not support GST timezone Ziyun Audrey Wang 18:37

May 19, 2016

Thread Author Time
ALTER TABLE can NOT use set (OIDS=true) 自己 06:47
BUG #14149: when use LATERAL functions with IMMUTABLE called multiple times turon.david 09:06
BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple virendra 12:33
Re: ALTER TABLE can NOT use set (OIDS=true) David G. Johnston 13:42
Re: BUG #14149: when use LATERAL functions with IMMUTABLE called multiple times Tom Lane 13:43
BUG #14151: Xml special symbols are not unescaped when gettting value of Xml via xpath onic 15:00
Re: BUG #14151: Xml special symbols are not unescaped when gettting value of Xml via xpath Tom Lane 17:56
Re: BUG #14151: Xml special symbols are not unescaped when gettting value of Xml via xpath David G. Johnston 19:06

May 20, 2016

Thread Author Time
Postgres Help - Reg vigneshwaran balaji 06:54
Re: Postgres Help - Reg David G. Johnston 12:55
BUG #14152: pg_dump does not take into account previous versions reserved keywords as column names alejandro 16:58
Re: BUG #14152: pg_dump does not take into account previous versions reserved keywords as column names Kevin Grittner 17:56
Re: BUG #14152: pg_dump does not take into account previous versions reserved keywords as column names John R Pierce 18:02
Re: BUG #14152: pg_dump does not take into account previous versions reserved keywords as column names David G. Johnston 18:11
Re: BUG #14152: pg_dump does not take into account previous versions reserved keywords as column names Michael Paquier 18:12
Re: BUG #14152: pg_dump does not take into account previous versions reserved keywords as column names Tom Lane 18:25
Re: BUG #14152: pg_dump does not take into account previous versions reserved keywords as column names David G. Johnston 18:59
Re: BUG #14152: pg_dump does not take into account previous versions reserved keywords as column names Tom Lane 19:13

May 21, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: [BUGS] BUG #13856: JDBC driver 1207 not picking up properties danap 17:37
Re: [BUGS] BUG #13856: JDBC driver 1207 not picking up properties Dave Cramer 22:06
BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE thomas.alton 23:28

May 22, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Peter Geoghegan 00:03
Re: BUG #14138: Inconsistent rounding behavior in float4 coercion Charles 19:18

May 23, 2016

Thread Author Time
please help me 📎 =?utf-8?B?emhhbmd0aW5ndGluZw==?= 08:52
BUG #14154: In pgpool while using delete query inside postgresql function , it is not deletingdata from all serve priyeshkaratha 13:29
Re: please help me David G. Johnston 15:17
Re: BUG #14154: In pgpool while using delete query inside postgresql function , it is not deletingdata from all serve David G. Johnston 15:31
Re: BUG #14138: Inconsistent rounding behavior in float4 coercion Francisco Olarte 16:44
Re: BUG #14138: Inconsistent rounding behavior in float4 coercion Tom Lane 17:00
Re: BUG #14138: Inconsistent rounding behavior in float4 coercion Charles 17:05
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE 📎 Peter Geoghegan 19:02
Re: BUG #14147: Restore of MatView of Foreign Data Table fails Tom Lane 19:07
Re: BUG #14147: Restore of MatView of Foreign Data Table fails Kevin Grittner 19:17
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Tom Lane 19:22
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Peter Geoghegan 19:28
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Tom Lane 19:48
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Peter Geoghegan 20:43
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Tom Lane 20:55
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Peter Geoghegan 21:07
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE 📎 Tom Lane 21:53
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Tom Lane 23:11
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Peter Geoghegan 23:15
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Tom Lane 23:27
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE Peter Geoghegan 23:33

May 24, 2016

Thread Author Time
BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table digoal 14:41

May 25, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Tom Lane 00:08
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table David G. Johnston 00:27
Re: BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Michael Paquier 01:04
Re: BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Tom Lane 01:11
Re: BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Michael Paquier 01:13
BUG #14156: Password Autehentication daniudass 08:55
BUG #14157: PostgreSQL 9.6 foreign table can improve with this case digoal 09:52
BUG #14158: PostgreSQL 9.6 bloom don't support unlogged table? digoal 09:54
Too high rate of progress information from pg_basebackup hubert depesz lubaczewski 10:37
Re: Too high rate of progress information from pg_basebackup Magnus Hagander 10:52
Re: Too high rate of progress information from pg_basebackup hubert depesz lubaczewski 10:54
Re: Too high rate of progress information from pg_basebackup Magnus Hagander 10:56
Re: Too high rate of progress information from pg_basebackup hubert depesz lubaczewski 10:58
Re: Postgres Help - Reg vigneshwaran balaji 11:20
BUG #14159: PostgreSQL 9.6 parallel scan consume very high mutex lock digoal 11:51
Re: BUG #14158: PostgreSQL 9.6 bloom don't support unlogged table? Hao Lee 12:24
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Jeff Janes 12:45
Re: BUG #14159: PostgreSQL 9.6 parallel scan consume very high mutex lock Amit Kapila 13:51
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Tom Lane 14:02
Re: BUG #14158: PostgreSQL 9.6 bloom don't support unlogged table? Tom Lane 14:16
Re: Postgres Help - Reg David G. Johnston 14:48
Re: BUG #14158: PostgreSQL 9.6 bloom don't support unlogged table? Michael Paquier 16:02
Re: BUG #14156: Password Autehentication Michael Paquier 16:29
Re: Too high rate of progress information from pg_basebackup Michael Paquier 16:38
Re: [HACKERS] BUG #13473: VACUUM FREEZE mistakenly cancel standby sessions 📎 Marco Nenciarini 17:33
Re: [HACKERS] BUG #13473: VACUUM FREEZE mistakenly cancel standby sessions Alvaro Herrera 23:30

May 26, 2016

Thread Author Time
postgresql dublicate content of primary key column Бутрин Денис 13:07

May 27, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14159: PostgreSQL 9.6 parallel scan consume very high mutex lock Amit Kapila 00:13
Re: BUG #14159: PostgreSQL 9.6 parallel scan consume very high mutex lock Andres Freund 00:21
Re: BUG #14159: PostgreSQL 9.6 parallel scan consume very high mutex lock Amit Kapila 05:57
Re: BUG #14159: PostgreSQL 9.6 parallel scan consume very high mutex lock Andres Freund 06:10
BUG #14160: DROP ACCESS METHOD IF EXISTS isn't implemented kou 07:04
Re: BUG #14160: DROP ACCESS METHOD IF EXISTS isn't implemented Michael Paquier 07:48
Re: BUG #14160: DROP ACCESS METHOD IF EXISTS isn't implemented Tom Lane 15:04
DateStyle ignored in postgresql.conf during 9.5 start? Justin Cranford 15:33
Re: DateStyle ignored in postgresql.conf during 9.5 start? Tom Lane 16:20

May 28, 2016

Thread Author Time
ram consumption Petar Djurkovic 09:26
BUG #14161: reverse index scan cann't use double link? digoal 09:52
BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates dmigowski 13:52
Re: BUG #14161: reverse index scan cann't use double link? Tom Lane 15:03
Re: BUG #14161: reverse index scan cann't use double link? 德哥 15:59
BUG #14163: Index only scan Buffer read enlarged when the data is random digoal 16:09
Re: ram consumption Tom Lane 16:52
Re: ram consumption Petar Djurkovic 17:18
Re: ram consumption Gavin Flower 22:16
Re: ram consumption Petar Djurkovic 23:17

May 29, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: ram consumption Gavin Flower 00:50
Re: ram consumption Francisco Olarte 09:03
Re: ram consumption Mark Kirkwood 10:36

May 30, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates Michael Paquier 03:53
Re: BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates Daniel Migowski 07:56
BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow kes-kes 08:50
BUG #14165: jdbc driver version 9.4 mtmayr 14:02
Re: BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow Tom Lane 17:10
Re: BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow David G. Johnston 18:02
Re: BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow KES 18:28
Re: BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow Tom Lane 19:01
Re: BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow David G. Johnston 19:55
Re: BUG #14164: Postgres allow to insert more data into field than this field allow David G. Johnston 20:05
Re: BUG #14134: segmentation fault with large table with gist index 📎 Peter Geoghegan 21:00

May 31, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates Michael Paquier 04:56
Re: BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates Daniel Migowski 05:47
BUG #14166: JDBC driver won't parse error message from DB server in German davygora 14:32

June 1, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14166: JDBC driver won't parse error message from DB server in German Michael Paquier 00:23
Re: BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates Andrew Gierth 02:16
BUG #14167: ecpg parser cann't ignore code in #ifdef ? digoal 03:33
Re: BUG #14162: No statistics for functions used as aggregates Daniel Migowski 04:46
BUG #14168: ALTER TABLE SET LOGGED failing ganesh.kannan 04:57
BUG #14169: Incorrect merge join result in 9.5 yancya 06:59
Re: BUG #14168: ALTER TABLE SET LOGGED failing David Gould 07:06
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14166: JDBC driver won't parse error message from DB server in German Davygora, Yuriy 08:20
Re: BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Michael Paquier 08:26
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14166: JDBC driver won't parse error message from DB server in German Dave Cramer 11:09
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14166: JDBC driver won't parse error message from DB server in German Vladimir Sitnikov 11:23
BUG #14170: error message in case LOCALE de_DE.UTF8 is used in combination with CLIENT_ENCODING=LATIN1 dag-hammerich 12:06
Re: BUG #14167: ecpg parser cann't ignore code in #ifdef ? Michael Meskes 13:43
BUG #14171: Wrong FSM file after switching hot standby to master timofeid 13:48
Re: BUG #14169: Incorrect merge join result in 9.5 David G. Johnston 14:20
Re: BUG #14169: Incorrect merge join result in 9.5 Tom Lane 16:10
Re: BUG #14169: Incorrect merge join result in 9.5 Kevin Grittner 16:15
Re: BUG #14168: ALTER TABLE SET LOGGED failing Ganesh Kannan 16:30

June 2, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14167: ecpg parser cann't ignore code in #ifdef ? 德哥 01:04
Re: BUG #14167: ecpg parser cann't ignore code in #ifdef ? Michael Paquier 01:59
Re: BUG #14171: Wrong FSM file after switching hot standby to master Michael Paquier 07:42
BUG #14172: RPM repository for i386 not working, repomd.xml file is missing. lony.namer 12:32
Re: BUG #14171: Wrong FSM file after switching hot standby to master Andres Freund 14:42
Re: BUG #14169: Incorrect merge join result in 9.5 Kevin Grittner 17:36
Re: BUG #14169: Incorrect merge join result in 9.5 Tom Lane 18:09
Re: BUG #14172: RPM repository for i386 not working, repomd.xml file is missing. Devrim Gündüz 23:09

June 3, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table 📎 Tom Lane 04:03
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Michael Paquier 06:11
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Michael Paquier 06:17
Re: BUG #14171: Wrong FSM file after switching hot standby to master Timofei Dynikov 10:09
BUG #14173: Not using partitions with ANY(ARRAY[...]) furstenheim 10:37
BUG #14174: Expanded-datum bug accessing freed memory andrew 12:46
BUG #14175: RPM Conflicts Origination from pgdg94 james.beck 13:31
Re: BUG #14171: Wrong FSM file after switching hot standby to master Michael Paquier 14:01
Re: BUG #14173: Not using partitions with ANY(ARRAY[...]) Tom Lane 14:22
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Tom Lane 14:25
After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Ganesh Kannan 15:03
BUG #14176: Re: BUG #14173: Not using partitions with ANY(ARRAY[...]) furstenheim 16:14
Re: BUG #14176: Re: BUG #14173: Not using partitions with ANY(ARRAY[...]) Francisco Olarte 16:49
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Tom Lane 17:05
Re: BUG #14174: Expanded-datum bug accessing freed memory Tom Lane 17:25
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Ganesh Kannan 17:29
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Ganesh Kannan 17:31
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Tom Lane 17:40
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Bruce Momjian 17:48
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Ganesh Kannan 18:38
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Ganesh Kannan 20:17
Re: BUG #14174: Expanded-datum bug accessing freed memory Andrew Gierth 20:47
BUG #14177: ARRAYs in VIEWs are inconsistently cast taylor.reece 22:17

June 4, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: After upgrade to 9.5 space not being released Jeff Janes 02:43
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Jeff Janes 03:27
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Tom Lane 03:55

June 5, 2016

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14134: segmentation fault with large table with gist index Tom Lane 15:54
Re: BUG #14134: segmentation fault with large table with gist index Peter Geoghegan 18:51

June 6, 2016

Thread Author Time
Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all Tomasz Ostrowski 14:25
Re: BUG #14177: ARRAYs in VIEWs are inconsistently cast Amit Langote 14:44
Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all Tom Lane 18:38
Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all 📎 Tom Lane 19:59
Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all Josh berkus 20:23

June 7, 2016

Thread Author Time
BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually ap 01:42
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually 📎 Michael Paquier 02:40
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table 📎 Michael Paquier 05:35
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually Thomas Munro 06:48
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually 📎 Michael Paquier 06:54
BUG #14179: Not enough info in error message dmigowski 07:50
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually Thomas Munro 07:55
BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave boa 09:16
Re: BUG #14178: output of jsonb_object and json_object doesn't match textually Michael Paquier 11:58
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table David G. Johnston 12:21
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table David G. Johnston 12:25
Re: BUG #14179: Not enough info in error message David G. Johnston 12:36
Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error Emiel Hermsen 12:58
Re: Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error Francisco Olarte 13:19
Re: Case in Order By Ignored without warning or error David G. Johnston 13:38
Re: BUG #14179: Not enough info in error message Daniel Migowski 13:39
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Tom Lane 16:23
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table David G. Johnston 16:59
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table Tom Lane 17:08
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Andres Freund 17:21
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Bo Ørsted Andresen 17:36
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Andres Freund 17:40
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Bo Ørsted Andresen 17:53
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Andres Freund 17:59
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Bo Ørsted Andresen 18:04
Re: BUG #14180: Segmentation fault on replication slave Andres Freund 18:06

Browse Archives

Prev | Next