pgsql-bugs since 2002-03-11 00:00

If you find a bug, please use the bug reporting form.

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

March 11, 2002

Thread Author Time
comparing null value in plpgsql. Bhuvan A 05:14
Re: comparing null value in plpgsql. Stephan Szabo 06:10
Re: comparing null value in plpgsql. bhuvanbk 07:03
Bug #611: configure script produces incorrect results under IRIX pgsql-bugs 07:08
Re: comparing null value in plpgsql. Bhuvan A 07:21
Bug #612: PostgreSQL 7.2 does not build according to documentation under IRIX w/ MIPSpro pgsql-bugs 08:09
Re: comparing null value in plpgsql. Stephan Szabo 08:15
[No subject] Bhuvan A 10:26
Re: Bug #608: cache lookup failed Yury Bokhoncovich 14:23
Re: Bug #611: configure script produces incorrect results under IRIX Tom Lane 14:28
Re: Yury Bokhoncovich 14:33
Re: Peter Eisentraut 16:46
Re: Stephan Szabo 17:02
Critical: Pgsql inserts bad timestamp (seconds 60.00) - causes failing of backup-restore Mozilla at Marela 17:59
Re: Juliano Ignacio 20:12
Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed value after crash pgsql-bugs 21:59
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed Bruce Momjian 23:02

March 12, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed Tom Lane 05:17
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed Justin 06:28
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed bgrimm 13:38
Case sensitive table names ? Per Winkvist 19:32
Build of PostgreSQL under Irix Robert E. Bruccoleri 19:41
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed Bruce Momjian 22:49
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed Tom Lane 23:36
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed Bruce Momjian 23:46
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed Bruce Momjian 23:51

March 13, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed Tom Lane 15:31
Re: referential constraint bug Stephan Szabo 16:13
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed Ben Grimm 16:28
SERIAL silently trunctates sequence name to 31 characters Ward Vandewege 16:47
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed Tom Lane 19:39
Case sensitive table names ? Per Winkvist 20:10
Re: referential constraint bug Bruce Momjian 20:31
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Mikheev, Vadim 21:03
Re: referential constraint bug Stephan Szabo 21:54
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec kpointed Tom Lane 22:00
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec kpointed Tom Lane 22:29
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously checkpointed Ben Grimm 22:32
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Mikheev, Vadim 22:34
Re: Case sensitive table names ? Peter Eisentraut 23:06

March 14, 2002

Thread Author Time
sequence havn't been dropped. Bhuvan A 05:11
Re: sequence havn't been dropped. Peter Eisentraut 05:53
Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Sridhar Bhamidi 08:12
Bug #614: Incorrect parse with time function pgsql-bugs 11:15
problem with new postgresql driver awais 11:32
Re: comparing null value in plpgsql. Tom Pfau 15:12
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Tom Pfau 15:26
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec bgrimm 15:29
Re: problem with new postgresql driver Stephan Szabo 15:33
Bug #615: Bug in ilke and ~~* Sql expression pgsql-bugs 16:22
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Tom Lane 17:27
Re: [HACKERS] Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Dave Cramer 17:54
Re: Bug #615: Bug in ilke and ~~* Sql expression Tom Lane 19:20
Re: [HACKERS] Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Tom Lane 19:33
Storage problems Daniel Malaquias de Freitas 20:54
Re: referential constraint bug Bruce Momjian 22:37
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Ben Grimm 22:47
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Tom Lane 23:58

March 15, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Mikheev, Vadim 00:17
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec 'Ben Grimm' 01:55
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Vadim Mikheev 09:05
Bug #616: Alter table add foreign key pgsql-bugs 12:24
Bug #617: In SQL the tableowner is not allowed pgsql-bugs 12:26
ALTER TABLE Problem dirk.jacobs 12:26
Bug #618: Incorrect error codes pgsql-bugs 12:27
Bug #619: Not possible to specify foreign key name pgsql-bugs 12:36
Re: Bug #616: Alter table add foreign key Stefano Reksten 12:39
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec 'Ben Grimm' 13:23
Bug #620: create index ... (date_part('year', d)) fails pgsql-bugs 13:52
[No subject] 📎 Viacheslav N Tararin 14:09
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Tom Lane 14:34
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec 📎 Tom Lane 14:39
Re: [HACKERS] Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously Bruce Momjian 15:43
Re: [HACKERS] Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously Bruce Momjian 15:44
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec 'Ben Grimm' 15:44
Re: Bug #614: Incorrect parse with time function Thomas Lockhart 15:47
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Tom Lane 16:03
Re: Bug #617: In SQL the tableowner is not allowed Peter Eisentraut 16:21
Re: Bug #619: Not possible to specify foreign key name Stephan Szabo 16:25
Re: Bug #620: create index ... (date_part('year', d)) fails Stephan Szabo 16:27
Re: Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Mikheev, Vadim 18:36

March 16, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: [BUGS] Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Clark C . Evans 01:54
Re: [BUGS] Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Rod Taylor 02:02
Re: [BUGS] Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec Vadim Mikheev 06:04
[No subject] minfrin@sharp.fm 15:32
Bug #621: why postgreSQL stored databases in digital filenames? pgsql-bugs 17:18

March 17, 2002

Thread Author Time
7.2 crash... Rod Taylor 00:56
psql's \r does not reset parenthesis depth counter Tom Lane 18:12
Re: psql's \r does not reset parenthesis depth counter Peter Eisentraut 21:55

March 18, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Bug #612: PostgreSQL 7.2 does not build according to documentation under IRIX w/ MIPSpro Tom Lane 06:06
Re: Bug #612: PostgreSQL 7.2 does not build according to Jonathan C. Patschke 06:56
Re: Bug #612: PostgreSQL 7.2 does not build according to documentation under IRIX w/ MIPSpro Tom Lane 15:13
Re: Bug #612: PostgreSQL 7.2 does not build according to Peter Eisentraut 16:37
Re: Bug #621: why postgreSQL stored databases in Darcy Buskermolen 16:54
Bug #622: jdbc driver exception: failed to get datetime field from a table pgsql-bugs 17:18

March 19, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: psql's \r does not reset parenthesis depth counter Bruce Momjian 00:13
Re: referential constraint bug Bruce Momjian 02:57
Problem with psql frontend Sullivan,Deric [CMC] 15:25
Re: Storage problems Tom Lane 23:55

March 20, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Bug #612: PostgreSQL 7.2 does not build according to documentation under IRIX w/ MIPSpro Robert E. Bruccoleri 00:54
Re: 7.2 crash... Tom Lane 05:25

March 22, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: 7.2 crash... Tom Lane 04:22
Re: 7.2 crash... Bruce Momjian 05:04

March 25, 2002

Thread Author Time
Bug #623: Compling 7.2 on a Tru64 V5.1 UNIX pgsql-bugs 22:27
Re: Bug #623: Compling 7.2 on a Tru64 V5.1 UNIX Peter Eisentraut 22:46

March 26, 2002

Thread Author Time
Bug #624: case sensitivity in pg_dumpall pgsql-bugs 13:53
Re: Bug #624: case sensitivity in pg_dumpall Tom Lane 15:35
Installing postgres Vaishakhi Ajmera 16:09
Inconsistant use of index. Ron Mayer 17:06
postmaster crash Michael Beckstette 17:18
Re: Inconsistant use of index. Tom Lane 17:37
Re: postmaster crash Tom Lane 17:46
Re: postmaster crash Michael Beckstette 18:03
Re: Inconsistant use of index. Michael G. Martin 18:10
Re: Inconsistant use of index. 📎 Ron Mayer 18:11
SEGV in contrib/array/array_iterator.c Matt Peterson 19:32
Re: Inconsistant use of index. Tom Lane 19:59

March 27, 2002

Thread Author Time
Disastrous : Server shuts down abnormally Kallol Nandi 00:37
Re: Inconsistant use of index. Ron Mayer 06:50
Bug #625: bytea data type problem/bug pgsql-bugs 20:25
Re: Bug #625: bytea data type problem/bug Joe Conway 21:27

March 28, 2002

Thread Author Time
Bug #626: Query with View not returning proper results pgsql-bugs 00:17

March 29, 2002

Thread Author Time
Bug #627: pgsql-bugs 07:27
huh!? Vlad Marchenko 12:18
Re: huh!? Vlad Marchenko 12:29
Re: Bug #627: Stephan Szabo 13:59
Re: Bug #627: Tom Lane 14:52

March 31, 2002

Thread Author Time
PGAccess and apostrophes... Ryan Grange 17:05
date function 'age' problem Konrad Gdowski 22:22

April 1, 2002

Thread Author Time
pg_dump bug Jie Liang 20:11
Solaris 8 install of postgres 7.2 Joe Piscitella 21:42

April 2, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: SEGV in contrib/array/array_iterator.c Tom Lane 18:29
Re: SEGV in contrib/array/array_iterator.c Stephan Szabo 20:05
Re: SEGV in contrib/array/array_iterator.c Tom Lane 20:22
Re: SEGV in contrib/array/array_iterator.c Stephan Szabo 20:29
Re: Solaris 8 install of postgres 7.2 Tom Lane 20:29
Re: huh!? Tom Lane 20:32
Re: SEGV in contrib/array/array_iterator.c Tom Lane 20:54

April 3, 2002

Thread Author Time
Bugs report Pierre-Alexis Paquin 09:02
Re: date function 'age' problem Thomas Lockhart 14:28
Bug #628: move works incorrectly on cursors using GiST indexes pgsql-bugs 17:47
Re: Inconsistant use of index. Ron Mayer 19:14
Re: Inconsistant use of index. Tom Lane 20:22
a problem with case in psql ystein Thorsen 20:40
A bug in gist code with fetch/move Dmitry Tkach 21:55
i need help chemseddine gara 23:22

April 4, 2002

Thread Author Time
Problem in postgresql installation Pierre-Alexis Paquin 08:01
pls unsubscribe me Ganesh Kumar 08:09
unsubscribe me Ganesh Kumar 08:24
Re: a problem with case in psql Stephan Szabo 16:37
Bug #629: "for ... select ... loop" repeat first 9 rows pgsql-bugs 17:48
Re: Bug #629: "for ... select ... loop" repeat first 9 rows Tom Lane 19:33

April 5, 2002

Thread Author Time
What's the difference? Victor Wagner 08:25
Re: Inconsistant use of index. Ron Mayer 08:41
Re: What's the difference? Tom Lane 15:23

April 8, 2002

Thread Author Time
Problem in Postgresql installation Pierre-Alexis Paquin 14:42
oh, i don't know did it is a bug or not. Terry Lou 15:35
Re: Problem in Postgresql installation Tom Lane 17:44
Full path to procedural language in the dump is a bug Victor Wagner 18:59
Re: What's the difference? Victor Wagner 19:17
Re: Full path to procedural language in the dump is a bug Tom Lane 19:32
Re: What's the difference? Tom Lane 19:43

April 9, 2002

Thread Author Time
Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed incorrectly... pgsql-bugs 01:35
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Thomas Lockhart 02:08
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed incorrectly... Sean Chittenden 02:12
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed incorrectly... Sean Chittenden 02:31
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Thomas Lockhart 05:36
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Sean Chittenden 22:07
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Sean Chittenden 22:42

April 10, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Thomas Lockhart 02:43
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Michael Loftis 02:51
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Tom Lane 04:26
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Sean Chittenden 04:44
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Tom Lane 05:01
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed 📎 Sean Chittenden 06:13
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Thomas Lockhart 06:35
About creating a new DB 📎 Akula Ramanjaneyul Reddy 06:40
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Sean Chittenden 06:45
ENC: Datatype time PostGreSql 7.2.1 Daniel Ferreira Felix 13:51
Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f pgsql-bugs 21:49
Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f Bruce Momjian 22:20
Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f Peter Eisentraut 22:23
Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f Bruce Momjian 22:29
Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f Peter Eisentraut 22:32
Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f Tom Lane 22:59
Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f Bruce Momjian 23:19

April 11, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f 📎 Bruce Momjian 04:55
problem with mandrake 8.2 renaud diez 09:33
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed 📎 Reinhard Max 12:55
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Thomas Lockhart 14:33
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Andreas Schwab 15:17
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Thomas Lockhart 15:59
Re: Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed Andreas Schwab 16:19
Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f Donald A Pellegrino 16:23
Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f Bruce Momjian 16:41
Re: Bug #631: pg_dumpall does not accept -F or -f Tom Lane 16:44

April 12, 2002

Thread Author Time
Problem with database creation 呉 安棋 07:26

April 13, 2002

Thread Author Time
Bug #632: Problem configuring postgresql pgsql-bugs 15:22
Re: Bug #632: Problem configuring postgresql Tom Lane 16:45

April 14, 2002

Thread Author Time
Problem Modify Grégory Bécue 11:37

Browse Archives

Prev | Next