pgsql-bugs before 2017-08-29 00:00

If you find a bug, please use the bug reporting form.

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31

Aug. 9, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 18:09
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 18:46
BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continued blocks thom 18:56
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Robert Haas 19:29
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 19:31
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane 21:26
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 21:29

Aug. 10, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund 00:20
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values 📎 Peter Eisentraut 00:45
BUG #14777: Postgres Installation not Successful. mithscool74 07:02
Re: BUG #14775: Incorrect documentation for the Commit logical replication message format 📎 Masahiko Sawada 08:21
BUG #14778: locale 'en-US' not recognized glenn.burkhardt 17:28
Re: BUG #14777: Postgres Installation not Successful. John R Pierce 18:18
Re: BUG #14778: locale 'en-US' not recognized Tom Lane 18:39
Re: [External] Re: BUG #14778: locale 'en-US' not recognized Burkhardt, Glenn B UTAS 19:56

Aug. 11, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Noah Misch 01:51
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund 01:55
Re: BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continued blocks Michael Meskes 01:58
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Augustine, Jobin 01:58
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane 01:59
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Eisentraut 02:31
Re: BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continued blocks Thomas S. Chin 09:04
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Augustine, Jobin 12:41
Re: BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continued blocks Michael Meskes 13:04
Re: BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continued blocks Thomas S. Chin 13:28
Re: BUG #14754: ecpg SQL parsing error Michael Meskes 13:38
[postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux) 15:33
Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 15:59
Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 20:20
Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Andres Freund 20:26

Aug. 12, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers Amit Kapila 02:34
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Noah Misch 03:56

Aug. 13, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Noah Misch 19:46
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund 19:57
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund 20:04
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Peter Geoghegan 20:35
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken 📎 Tom Lane 20:47
Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane 20:55
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane 21:17
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund 21:22
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane 21:35
Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Peter Geoghegan 22:36

Aug. 14, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Augustine, Jobin 09:01
Re: BUG #14754: ecpg SQL parsing error Michael Meskes 09:33
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Peter Eisentraut 12:53
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane 14:57
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Eisentraut 15:08
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Eisentraut 15:16
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Eisentraut 15:17
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 16:09
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Eisentraut 16:27
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 16:51
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values 📎 Peter Eisentraut 17:22
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 17:41
Re: BUG #14775: Incorrect documentation for the Commit logical replication message format Peter Eisentraut 17:45
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane 18:00
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 18:14
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane 18:32
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 18:45
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane 19:17
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 19:54
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane 20:13
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 20:28
BUG #14779: Can't Backup Database myprofmailbox 21:55
Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Andres Freund 22:29
Re: BUG #14779: Can't Backup Database Michael Paquier 22:35
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values 📎 Peter Geoghegan 22:35
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane 23:11

Aug. 15, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14775: Incorrect documentation for the Commit logical replication message format Masahiko Sawada 01:30
Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Noah Misch 02:52
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 03:55
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane 04:23
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 04:41
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Tom Lane 04:56
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 05:16
Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 📎 Amit Kapila 11:31
Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas 13:20
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 13:46
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Peter Eisentraut 14:01
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane 14:04
Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund 15:07
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Andres Freund 15:10
Re: BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continued blocks Michael Meskes 15:16
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane 15:24
Re: BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continued blocks Thomas S. Chin 15:38

Aug. 16, 2017

Thread Author Time
BUG #14780: PostgreSQL 9.6 selects a wrong plan during aggregation against timestamp columns sogawa 01:47
Postgre driver(9.06.04.00) connected to Amazon redshift, is returning wrong count in SQLRowCount Asif Shaikh 07:08
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Augustine, Jobin 11:09
BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault maksim_karaba 11:32
Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas 13:16
Re: BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault Tom Lane 13:46
Re: BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault 📎 Maksim Karaba 15:01
Re: BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault Tom Lane 15:10
Re: BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault Maksim Karaba 15:45
Hello I got this error when installing postgresql 9.4 on my antsle debian 8 LXC do you know a work around? Manuel Tijerino 16:03
Re: BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault Tom Lane 16:28
Re: Hello I got this error when installing postgresql 9.4 on my antsle debian 8 LXC do you know a work around? Tom Lane 16:44
Re: BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault Alvaro Herrera 16:47
Re: BUG #14781: server process was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault Tom Lane 16:56
User who created a trigger is not able to drop it Ali . 21:46
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tatsuo Ishii 23:13
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Michael Paquier 23:41
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tom Lane 23:57

Aug. 17, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Peter Eisentraut 00:00
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tatsuo Ishii 00:14
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tatsuo Ishii 00:15
Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Michael Paquier 01:32
Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken Tatsuo Ishii 01:50
Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila 04:37
Re: \copy produces CSV output that cannot be read by \copy Michael Paquier 04:53
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Thomas Munro 05:07
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 📎 Amit Kapila 09:55
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 14:19
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila 14:38
Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 📎 Amit Kapila 15:09
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 15:21
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 17:50
Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 18:06
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas 18:14
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 18:52
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 22:20

Aug. 18, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Eisentraut 01:13
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 01:22
BUG #14782: VSS backup of postgres database vinod.t.v 05:18
BUG #14783: The ODBC administration tool crashes when I configure 64-bit pgsqlOdbc somda3florent 09:13
seems column(alias_name) is a valid syntax? I cant find anything alike in docs Vladimir Svedov 10:52
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila 10:52
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values 📎 Peter Geoghegan 19:36

Aug. 19, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Eisentraut 02:47
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 02:55
BUG #14784: www_fdw extension is vulnerable 302790951 03:03
Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values Peter Geoghegan 03:23
Re: BUG #14784: www_fdw extension is vulnerable Heikki Linnakangas 06:22
Re: BUG #14784: www_fdw extension is vulnerable Michael Paquier 08:08
Re: BUG #14780: PostgreSQL 9.6 selects a wrong plan during aggregation against timestamp columns Greg Stark 19:49

Aug. 20, 2017

Thread Author Time
centos 7 repository Виктор Пунин 08:53
Re: centos 7 repository John Pierce 17:26
BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after adding a column. Bug? yxq 19:17

Aug. 21, 2017

Thread Author Time
json and jsonb bug report Atsushi Ide 04:35
Re: json and jsonb bug report David G. Johnston 05:10
BUG #14786: Wrong Precision with money datatype nithinkrishna.p 08:04
BUG #14787: Postgresql_for_odoo fadheljmuhammad 09:08
PostgreSQL 9.4.13 is facing issue in shutting down Abhijit Gharami 10:26
BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. fujimoto 10:44
Re: centos 7 repository John Pierce 14:33
Re: BUG #14787: Postgresql_for_odoo David G. Johnston 14:36
Re: BUG #14786: Wrong Precision with money datatype David G. Johnston 14:38

Aug. 22, 2017

Thread Author Time
BUG #14789: In Cascading Replication，the "wal_level" is setted to "archive",the operation becomes abnomal 691525127 03:02
Fwd: PostgreSQL 9.4.13 is facing issue in shutting down Abhijit Gharami 04:58
Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 9.4.13 is facing issue in shutting down Michael Paquier 05:35
直接执行psql.exe出现的问题 樊异森 06:33
Re: [BUGS] Fwd: PostgreSQL 9.4.13 is facing issue in shutting down Abhijit Gharami 06:37
TO_TSVECTOR acts differently with national charcters Mart Palmas 08:53
Re: [BUGS] 直接执行psql.exe出现的问题 Wei Congrui 14:39
Re: BUG #14786: Wrong Precision with money datatype Tom Lane 15:55
Re: PostgreSQL 9.4.13 is facing issue in shutting down Peter Eisentraut 19:16
Re: BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after adding a column. Bug? Peter Eisentraut 19:22
Re: BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after adding a column. Bug? Andres Freund 19:34
Odp: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after adding a column. Bug? yxq 20:54

Aug. 23, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 9.4.13 is facing issue in shutting down Michael Paquier 00:55
Re: BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. Masahiko Sawada 08:06
Re: BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after adding a column. Bug? Peter Eisentraut 13:25
Re: BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. Fujimoto Seiji 14:00
Re: BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after adding a column. Bug? Andres Freund 16:31
Re: BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after adding a column. Bug? Peter Eisentraut 21:35
Re: BUG #14785: Logical replication does not work after adding a column. Bug? Andres Freund 21:39

Aug. 24, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. Masahiko Sawada 03:29
Re: BUG #14768: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF NOT EXISTS cancels autovacuum even if the index already exists. Michael Paquier 04:35
Re: BUG #14768: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF NOT EXISTS cancels autovacuum even if the index already exists. Tom Lane 05:00
Re: BUG #14768: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF NOT EXISTS cancels autovacuum even if the index already exists. Marcin Barczyński 07:32
BUG #14790: pg_restore - segfault soleuu 08:57
Re: BUG #14790: pg_restore - segfault Fabrízio de Royes Mello 10:05
Re: BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. Tom Lane 14:18
Re: BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. Stephen Frost 14:26
Re: BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. Masahiko Sawada 14:49
Standby corruption after master is restarted Emre Hasegeli 14:50
Re: BUG #14788: `pg_restore -c` won't restore schema access privileges. Masahiko Sawada 15:27
Re: TO_TSVECTOR acts differently with national charcters Arthur Zakirov 19:01
Re: Standby corruption after master is restarted Andres Freund 19:07
Re: Standby corruption after master is restarted Emre Hasegeli 20:19

Aug. 26, 2017

Thread Author Time
issue with C functions using pg_dump Cédric Prin-Derre 18:08
Re: issue with C functions using pg_dump Tom Lane 19:36
Re: issue with C functions using pg_dump 📎 Cédric Prin-Derre 21:25
Re: issue with C functions using pg_dump Tom Lane 21:37

Aug. 27, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 18:10
Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 📎 Tom Lane 20:29

Aug. 28, 2017

Thread Author Time
Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? 📎 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 11:02
Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? Michael Paquier 11:14
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila 12:26
Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 12:31
Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila 12:44
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 13:04
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Amit Kapila 14:05
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 14:47
Gin Index Creation Failure Yaser Raja 15:42
Re: Gin Index Creation Failure Tom Lane 16:00
Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas 17:43
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 19:00
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Robert Haas 22:03
Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 Tom Lane 22:35

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31