Navigating Maturity Spikes: A Strategic Approach to Liquidity Management Managing maturity spikes in funding is a critical aspect of effective liquidity management for banks. Such spikes occur when a significant volume of liabilities or funding sources are due for renewal or repayment at the same time, potentially leading to liquidity strain if not managed appropriately. Understanding and strategically addressing these maturity concentrations is essential for maintaining financial stability and ensuring ongoing operational resilience. The first step in managing maturity spikes involves accurate forecasting and monitoring. Banks must have robust systems in place to predict cash flow needs and identify potential maturity concentrations in advance. This foresight allows for the development of contingency plans to address potential liquidity shortfalls, ensuring that the bank remains prepared for various scenarios. Diversification of funding sources plays a crucial role in mitigating the risks associated with maturity spikes. By spreading funding sources across a variety of maturities and types, banks can reduce their reliance on any single source of funding, thereby enhancing their liquidity profile. This strategy involves a mix of short-term and long-term funding, as well as considering a variety of instruments such as deposits, bonds, and other borrowings. Active management of assets is another key strategy. Banks can improve their liquidity position by maintaining a portfolio of high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) that can be quickly converted into cash without significant loss. This portfolio acts as a buffer during periods of stress, providing the bank with additional flexibility to meet its liquidity needs. Moreover, engaging in proactive dialogue with stakeholders, including investors, depositors, and regulators, is advantageous. Transparent communication about the bank’s liquidity management strategies and stability can bolster confidence among stakeholders, potentially easing the pressure during maturity spikes. Finally, stress testing and scenario analysis are indispensable tools in the arsenal of liquidity management. By simulating various adverse conditions, including severe maturity spikes, banks can assess the robustness of their liquidity positions and adjust their strategies accordingly. This proactive approach ensures that banks are not only prepared for normal market conditions but are also resilient in the face of financial stress. In essence, managing maturity spikes in funding is a multifaceted challenge that requires a strategic and proactive approach. Through accurate forecasting, diversification of funding sources, active asset management, effective stakeholder communication, and rigorous stress testing, banks can navigate these challenges successfully. By prioritising liquidity management, banks can ensure their long-term stability and continue to serve their customers and communities effectively.
Global Financial Markets Insights
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
Margin call. The mechanic that kills well-intentioned hedgers. Post 05 covered mark-to-market as a liquidity risk, with Metallgesellschaft. This goes deeper into the mechanics: exchange, OTC, the spiral, and how to size the buffer. The 5 things to understand beyond the basics. 1. Variation margin vs initial margin Initial margin is the collateral the exchange (or counterparty) requires when you open a futures position. Variation margin is the daily flow: every price change creating a loss is charged the next day, every gain credited. Together they are the real liquidity exposure. When price moves a lot, the exchange can raise initial margin ("margin hike") while variation margin rips, and the total can double or triple in days. 2. CCP vs OTC On an exchange the counterparty is the central counterparty (CCP), which requires daily variation margin automatically. In OTC with a bank, margin is set in the CSA (Credit Support Annex): daily, threshold (only above an exposure level), or lower-frequency. Corporate CSAs usually have thresholds, so quiet markets feel like there's no charge; when the market moves hard, the threshold is crossed and the charge starts abruptly. 3. Margin spiral The nightmare. Market moves hard against the book, variation margin rips, the company pays with cash, runs out, liquidates to raise money. The liquidation pushes the market further adverse, raising variation margin on other players, who also liquidate. Forced selling begets forced selling: a liquidity crisis becomes a market crisis. 4. Historical examples Metallgesellschaft 1993: correct crude stack-and-roll, futures margin calls decoupled from physical realization, 1.3 billion loss (post 05). Sumitomo copper 1996: concentrated LME copper position, margin call pressure, unwinding into a 2.6 billion dollar loss. WTI negative in April 2020: margin calls on ETFs and holders of the May contract, forced liquidations pushing the price to -37 in a day. LME nickel March 2022: short squeeze, margin calls ripping, the LME suspended trading and cancelled trades. 5. How to manage Three principles. First, a cash buffer sized for a stress scenario, not a central one: how much cash must be available if the market moves 2 or 3 standard deviations against the position? Second, a pre-approved committed credit line, because in stress new lines vanish exactly when you need them. Third, alignment between risk, treasury, and operations on who triggers what. Without a playbook, a crisis becomes two. Margin call is where risk management meets treasury, and hedging meets liquidity. Treating it as an operational detail leaves your most critical risk to whoever finds out last. A mature program has the scenarios mapped, the buffer sized, governance defined, and the ability to pay tested at the worst moment. How is the margin buffer sized on your desk: by VaR or by stress scenario?
-
Cash Pooling & Intercompany Netting Cheat Sheet! In many multinational organizations, liquidity risk is not caused by a lack of cash. It is caused by poor internal cash visibility and inefficient capital deployment. I’ve seen corporate groups: ▪ Sitting on surplus balances in one subsidiary ▪ Running overdrafts in another ▪ Borrowing externally at >10% ▪ While internal liquidity earns < 1% in idle accounts That’s not a funding problem. That’s a Treasury process problem. The Real Treasury Mandate: Cash Pooling and Intercompany Netting are not operational tools. They are enterprise liquidity optimization mechanisms designed to: ▪ Centralize enterprise-wide liquidity ▪ Reallocate surplus from cash-rich entities to deficit positions ▪ Minimize external borrowing ▪ Reduce trapped cash across subsidiaries ▪ Lower interest expense & negative carry ▪ Improve working capital efficiency ▪ Streamline intercompany settlements ▪ Reduce FX transaction costs When deployed correctly, Treasury evolves into an In-House Bank (IHB) - funding the group internally before approaching external lenders. What Happens in a Pooling + Netting Environment? Instead of: Subsidiary A borrowing externally Subsidiary B investing idle cash Subsidiary C making multiple FX settlements Treasury can: → Sweep idle balances into a central header account (Physical Pooling) → Offset debit & credit balances without fund movement (Notional Pooling) → Multilaterally settle intercompany A/R & A/P via a Netting Center Result? ▪ Fewer cross-border payments. ▪ Lower FX exposure. ▪ Reduced banking fees. ▪ Optimized group-wide interest yield. The Interest Optimization Effect Pooling allows Treasury to offset: Debit balances with internal surplus liquidity Which means: ▪ Reduced reliance on external credit facilities ▪ Improved group net interest position ▪ Centralized investment of excess cash ▪ CPM-aligned internal capital deployment Liquidity stops sitting idle. It starts working for the enterprise. Implementation goes beyond technical expertise. Successful pooling + netting requires alignment across: ▪ Intercompany loan agreements ▪ Transfer pricing policies ▪ Withholding tax implications ▪ Capitalization rules ▪ Cross-border regulatory constraints ▪ ERP & TMS integration ▪ Subsidiary participation frameworks Treasury transformation is as much about governance as it is about technology. Strategic Outcome: Cash Pooling & Netting enables: ▪ Internal liquidity redeployment ▪ Reduced reliance on external borrowing ▪ Centralized funding strategy ▪ Enterprise-wide cash visibility ▪ More strategic capital allocation In other words: Treasury moves from managing cash…to controlling liquidity. ♻️ Repost & Share!
-
How Treasurers Can Unlock Cash Through Netting & Pooling In an environment of higher interest rates and tighter credit, the best liquidity is often the one you already have. Yet many organizations still borrow externally while trapped cash sits idle across subsidiaries and currencies. That’s where netting and pooling come in, two of treasury’s most underused tools for internal liquidity optimization. Here’s how leading treasurers are using them to fund growth internally, reduce external debt, and improve cash visibility. 1. Start with visibility. Before designing a netting or pooling program, map who owes what, where, and in which currency. A 360° view of intercompany balances, FX exposures, and timing mismatches reveals the real opportunity. 2. Choose the right mechanism for your organization. Netting centralizes intercompany settlements by offsetting payables and receivables to minimize FX and transaction costs. Cash pooling consolidates balances physically or notionally across entities and currencies. 3. Design with tax, legal, and banking alignment. Netting and pooling are powerful but only if they’re compliant. Engage tax and legal early to define participation rules, ownership of funds, and interest allocation. Align with your banks on structure (physical vs. notional pooling, multicurrency support, interest set-offs). 4. Automate the engine, not just the math. The real gains come from automation. A good TMS can: Calculate and post intercompany settlements automatically. Integrate with ERP for real-time balances. Handle multi-currency conversions at agreed rates. Automation reduces manual effort by up to 60% and enforces discipline in funding cycles. 5. Treat it as a liquidity strategy, not an accounting process. Treasurers use netting and pooling to: Free up 5–10% of trapped cash. Reduce external borrowing by 15–25%. Simplify FX settlements and lower bank fees. It’s not just process efficiency but it’s capital optimization. When liquidity works harder internally, the balance sheet gets stronger externally.
-
If cash dries out of your business, it’s usually your fault. I’ve seen businesses grow on paper. And struggle in the bank. Cash flow isn’t about revenue. It’s about control. Here’s my 10-point cheatsheet to keep cash healthy: 1/ Take upfront payments ↳ Ask for 50% upfront instead of 100% later. ↳ Reduces risk and keeps operations running. 💡 Gives you breathing room to invest or scale safely. 2/ Shorten payment terms ↳ Don’t default to net 30. Aim for 7–14 days. ↳ Follow up consistently on invoices. 💡 Faster payments = more predictable cash flow. 3/ Use the 80/20 rule ↳ Focus on the 20% of actions that solve 80% of cash issues. ↳ Avoid wasting time chasing minor issues. 💡 You fix the biggest leaks with minimal effort. 4/ Offer a discount for cash ↳ Give small discounts to encourage upfront payments. ↳ Reduce credit card or processing fees. 💡 More cash in hand. Happier clients. 5/ Diversify clients ↳ No client should represent more than 15% of revenue. ↳ Avoid dependency on a single source. 💡 Reduces risk and increases negotiating power. 6/ Get a line of credit ↳ Use it as a buffer for operating expenses. ↳ Don’t rely on it for growth. Only for timing gaps. 💡 Smooths cash crunches and keeps operations running. 7/ Build recurring revenue ↳ Offer subscriptions where possible. ↳ Convert repeatable services into predictable income. 💡 Predictable cash = less stress and more planning ability. 8/ Leverage your portfolio ↳ Use existing assets as collateral for liquidity. ↳ Access short-term funds without selling assets. 💡 Unlock cash quickly while retaining control. 9/ Master cashflow basics ↳ Track inflows and outflows weekly. ↳ Know when shortfalls may hit. 💡 Early visibility prevents crises before they happen. 10/ Diversify offerings ↳ Multiple products or services reduce dependency. ↳ Test new revenue streams without risking core business. 💡 Upside: Strengthens resilience and long-term growth. Cash is not about revenue alone. It’s about control, predictability, and freedom to act. Which of these cash strategies is missing in your business right now? ♻ Repost if this helped. ✅ Follow Kinza Azmat for posts on growing, leading, and scaling a business.
-
One of the simplest shifts I teach SMB owners: segment your cash into 3 buckets. Here’s why... “Do we have enough cash in the bank?” is the wrong question to manage your liquidity. One unexpected event, a delayed customer payment, a downturn, an acquisition opportunity, and you’re exposed. That’s why we coach clients to build a tiered liquidity strategy: 1. Operating cash. This is the cash you need to run day-to-day operations. It covers payroll, rent, vendors, taxes. We typically advise keeping at least 1–2 months of expenses here. Too little and you’re constantly stressed. Too much and you’re leaving money idle. 2. Emergency reserves. This protects against shocks: a major customer defaults, sales slow down, market shifts. For most SMBs, 3–6 months of fixed costs is a good target. 3. Strategic cash. This is your “offense” layer. Funds set aside for opportunities: buying a competitor, launching a new product, hiring a key executive. You’d be surprised how many companies miss out on great opportunities because they lack strategic liquidity. The key is to be intentional. Most businesses mix all their cash in one pile. That makes it hard to know what’s truly available for growth vs. survival. Segment it. Know your numbers. Build discipline around each tier. The companies that do this not only sleep better at night. They also move faster when opportunity knocks. Liquidity isn’t about having cash. It’s about having the right cash in the right place.
-
A client is in a big cash flow crunch after buying a business 9 months ago. Here’s the plan: 1. Get clarity with a 13 week cashflow forecast. Two weeks in they already have less stress and can see where we stand vs being in a fog before. 2. Take control of the cash levers. Pull cash forward by collecting deposits sooner, selling new customers, and invoicing faster. Push payments out - take the longer terms with vendors, decide what bills can wait, only order necessary supplies. 3. Negotiate and collaborate with vendors. They got 3 months of no SBA loan payments, asked for a bigger line of credit, working with their 3 leases to get some concessions or lower rents, and found $3-4k/mo in savings my trimming down service agreements. 4. Rally the team - the team knows it’s been a slower summer than anticipated. So they’ve rallied to drive sales promotions, be efficient with staffing, and take great care of new customers. They should be ok but it’s going to be tight for 5-6 months. And the business will come out stronger.
-
Selling securities is not a liquidity strategy. It's a reaction — and often a costly one. The traditional approach to portfolio liquidity is familiar: hold securities you can sell when you need cash. Regulators look for it. Bankers plan around it. But here's the problem with selling as your primary liquidity tool: 👉 Not all securities sell easily — Treasuries do, but munis and mortgage structures may not, especially in volatile markets 👉 If you are forced to sell at a loss, you get hit twice: an earnings hit and a capital hit – and if you’re still sitting on underwater securities from the interest rate run-up, that pain can compound fast 👉 It puts you in reactive mode, scrambling to meet needs instead of planning ahead There's a better approach: strategic cash flow management. The concept is straightforward. Design your portfolio to generate predictable principal payments that meet liquidity needs - without ever selling a security. Securities mature at par. Amortizing securities pay down over time. Cash returns naturally. No realized losses. No earnings volatility. No capital erosion. Here's what it looks like in practice. A $750M community bank with a $125M portfolio structured to generate $1.5–2M in monthly cash flow. When loan growth accelerated and deposit competition intensified, that steady cash flow funded new loans and buffered against deposit volatility, without having to sell a single security. The key? Being able to project cash flow 12–18 months out. That requires intentional maturity structuring and controlled optionality exposure. Three questions to assess where you stand: 👉 Can you project your portfolio's principal cash flow for the next 12 months? 👉 Is that cash flow distributed relatively evenly across quarters — or concentrated in one period? 👉 What percentage of your cash flow comes from unpredictable sources like callable bonds? If you're unsure on any of these, there’s an opportunity to build more predictability into how your investment portfolio supports your institution’s liquidity management efforts. I covered the full framework — including a four-scenario matrix that tells you exactly where your portfolio stands and what to do about it — in Episode 047 of the Bond Investment Mentor podcast. As always, if you have questions, drop them below or feel free to message me directly. #CommunityBanking #FixedIncome
-
𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐥𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐲. I still see too many finance conversations start with: “𝑾𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝒘𝒆 𝒄𝒖𝒕 2%?” That matters. But it is not often the first place I look. 𝐈 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐡 𝐚𝐥𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐲𝐜𝐥𝐞. PwC’s 2025 Global Treasury Survey found that both CFOs and treasurers rank cash and liquidity management as a top priority in today’s environment of rising costs, rate volatility, and macro uncertainty. That is why working capital deserves more attention than it usually gets. Not because it is glamorous. 𝐁𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥. 🔸 Better collection discipline. 🔸 Smarter inventory turns. 🔸 More thoughtful supplier-term management. 🔸 Cleaner visibility across AP, AR, and treasury. That is often where liquidity is hiding. Importantly, improving working capital can free up cash for the business without relying on external financing. PwC describes cash released from operations as coming at “zero cost” relative to financing arrangements. A few principles I focus on: 1. 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐡 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐲𝐜𝐥𝐞. If you are not measuring DSO, DIO, and DPO clearly across the business, you are guessing where cash is trapped. 2. 𝐃𝐨 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐥𝐞𝐭 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐞. McKinsey makes the point well: working capital performance sits across finance, sales, procurement, operations, and supply chain. That is exactly why so many programs stall. 3. 𝐅𝐢𝐱 𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. BCG highlights the value of a working-capital control tower that shows aging, discounts, and actual versus contractual days to pay. You cannot improve what you cannot see. 4. 𝐁𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐞 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐬. A 5-day improvement in working capital would not always beat a 2% cost cut. That depends on the business model. But this: many companies underestimate the liquidity already sitting in receivables, inventory, and payables. The best liquidity strategy is not always new debt. Sometimes it is simply unlocking the cash you have already earned. 𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒊𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒃𝒊𝒈𝒈𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈-𝒄𝒂𝒑𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝒃𝒐𝒕𝒕𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒆𝒄𝒌 𝒊𝒏 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒃𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒓𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒏𝒐𝒘: 𝒄𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔, 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚, 𝒔𝒖𝒑𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒔, 𝒐𝒓 𝒇𝒓𝒂𝒈𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒗𝒊𝒔𝒊𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚? #Finmo #CFO #Treasury #WorkingCapital #CashFlow Ref: PwC, 2025 Global Treasury Survey; PwC, Working Capital Study 23/24; PwC, 2025 Middle East Working Capital Study; McKinsey, Transforming the culture of managing working capital; McKinsey, Gain transformation momentum early by optimizing working capital; BCG, Three Factors Driving Firms to Improve Balance Sheets; BCG. Akhil Nigam | David Hanna | Raj Vimal Chopra | Richard Oh
-
You can be profitable on paper and still go bankrupt by Friday. Profit is an accounting concept... Cash is a survival reality. If you are struggling with "Cash-Flow Terror," it’s because you’ve confused revenue with liquidity. Investors don't save companies that can't manage their own wallet. Here is the no-BS checklist to bridge the gap and stay "Default Alive": ➤ 1. Calculate Your Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) This is the math of your survival. It tells you how long every $1 is trapped before it comes back as $1.20. → Formula: CCC = Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) + Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) - Days Payable Outstanding (DPO). → Example: If it takes 45 days for customers to pay (DSO)... And you hold stock for 15 days (DIO)... But you pay suppliers in 30 days (DPO)... Your CCC is 30 days. You must fund 30 days of operations entirely out of pocket. If you don't have the cash for those 30 days, you are dead. ➤ 2. Move to a 13-Week Rolling Forecast Monthly accounting is for historians. Weekly forecasting is for wartime CEOs. → Build a spreadsheet that tracks every single expected inflow and outflow by Friday of every week. → If the "Ending Balance" on any week hits a red number, you have a 3-week lead time to fix it, not a 3-day panic. ➤ 3. Weaponize Your Accounts Receivable (A/R) Stop being a free bank for your customers. → Incentivize early payments with a 2% "Quick-Pay" discount. → Implement "Auto-Deduct" for SaaS or "Upfront Deposits" for services. If a customer is always late, they aren't a customer... they are a liability. ➤ 4. Extend Your Accounts Payable (DPO) Keep your $ as long as humanly possible. → Renegotiate with every vendor for Net-60 or Net-90 terms. → Explain that you are scaling and need the room. Most vendors will trade longer terms for a long-term contract. ➤ 5. Scrutinize "Fixed" vs. "Variable" Costs In terror mode, everything must be variable. → Can you move that expensive agency to a performance-based fee? → Can you swap a fixed salary for a lower base + higher commission? → If a cost doesn't directly contribute to bringing cash in within the next 30 days, it is optional. ➤ 6. Avoid the "Short-Term Debt" Spiral Personal credit cards and high-interest payday loans for startups are an amputation disguised as a band-aid. → Look for revenue-based financing or factoring if you have solid invoices. → Never use high-interest debt to cover structural losses. Only use it to bridge a timing gap. Stop managing your ego. Start managing your liquidity. --- Want brutal clarity on your startup? Skip years of wasted effort and stop making expensive mistakes. Get direct advice on your deck, fundraising, GTM, or founder challenges. Book a no-BS 1:1 call with me here: https://lnkd.in/gWV8DT56 💬 Drop your most burning question in the comments. ♻ Repost to save a founder from a midnight panic. 🔔 Follow Anshuman Sinha for more Startup insights. #Startups #VentureCapital #Entrepreneurship #Management #Economy
Explore categories
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Productivity
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Healthcare
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Career
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development