rajaravivarma_r
Se unió el sept 2011
Te damos la bienvenida a el nuevo perfil
Seguimos trabajando en la actualización de algunas funciones del perfil. Para ver los distintivos, los desgloses de las calificaciones y las encuestas para este perfil ve a versión anterior .
Comentarios14
Calificación de rajaravivarma_r
Positives:
First thing is the fantasy world was well done. The first thing that stands out is how well the land is used for the story building. This has only been offered in Bahubali-2, AFAIK. The names of the landmass, the culture of the people, and how the culture of the people is established is really well thought out. Even the names of the characters stand out, and sound fresh to the ears, not the usual "pure tamil names".
The landscape is really well done, it must have been augmented with CGI, but it was captivating and unique. I watched in 3D, so that might have made a difference. Coming to 3D, it was really well utilized to enhance the shots and the environment, not a gimmick. This film has more to offer in 3D, than Captain America: The first avenger.
The is definitely some character building and most of the characters have well deserved, useful screen presence.
The songs are crisp and good, especially Kanga Kanga Kanguva song looks great on the screen. The BGM elevates all the scenes, thanks to DSP, but it has it drawbacks as well.
The attempt to connect two parallel stories is good.
Negatives:
The BGM elevates all the scenes, so the characters in the screen have to match that by showing their "aggression" in certain ways, which gets repeating after sometime.
The screenplay for the present time story is just flat and the usual. Looks like a "copy-paste" from other films of Siva. Modern portions could have been a lot better. Disha Patani is just fan service.
The movie has some flaws but offers something novel and enjoyable, if you choose to overlook those. Keep the expectation low and you will enjoy the movie.
I don't get how audiences like us get satisfied by a beaten to the death stories like Pushpa, but bash a movie which offers something new.
First thing is the fantasy world was well done. The first thing that stands out is how well the land is used for the story building. This has only been offered in Bahubali-2, AFAIK. The names of the landmass, the culture of the people, and how the culture of the people is established is really well thought out. Even the names of the characters stand out, and sound fresh to the ears, not the usual "pure tamil names".
The landscape is really well done, it must have been augmented with CGI, but it was captivating and unique. I watched in 3D, so that might have made a difference. Coming to 3D, it was really well utilized to enhance the shots and the environment, not a gimmick. This film has more to offer in 3D, than Captain America: The first avenger.
The is definitely some character building and most of the characters have well deserved, useful screen presence.
The songs are crisp and good, especially Kanga Kanga Kanguva song looks great on the screen. The BGM elevates all the scenes, thanks to DSP, but it has it drawbacks as well.
The attempt to connect two parallel stories is good.
Negatives:
The BGM elevates all the scenes, so the characters in the screen have to match that by showing their "aggression" in certain ways, which gets repeating after sometime.
The screenplay for the present time story is just flat and the usual. Looks like a "copy-paste" from other films of Siva. Modern portions could have been a lot better. Disha Patani is just fan service.
The movie has some flaws but offers something novel and enjoyable, if you choose to overlook those. Keep the expectation low and you will enjoy the movie.
I don't get how audiences like us get satisfied by a beaten to the death stories like Pushpa, but bash a movie which offers something new.
Honestly, I didn't go with any expectations. I didn't give much thought to who the director was, then I watched the film and got my mind blown. Thank you Mr. Gnanavel. This was a brilliant movie.
The film started in a usual Thalaivar's movie tone and soon the story comes into the picture. The casting was brilliant. I mean, keeping Rajini in the main role and rotating the rest of the cast is done beautifully. Each and every character has done justice to their screen time. I wouldn't say one useless character was shown in the screen. Even a friend character has his presence appropriately.
The mass elements were there but kept to appropriate levels. The dialogues were spot on, but there are a few dialogues kept to service Rajini fans, nothing out of the place though.
Thanks to Rajini for choosing this script and Gnanavel for choosing Rajini to do this. Great movie, with good rewatch value. I came out of the theater fulfilled with joy.
The film started in a usual Thalaivar's movie tone and soon the story comes into the picture. The casting was brilliant. I mean, keeping Rajini in the main role and rotating the rest of the cast is done beautifully. Each and every character has done justice to their screen time. I wouldn't say one useless character was shown in the screen. Even a friend character has his presence appropriately.
The mass elements were there but kept to appropriate levels. The dialogues were spot on, but there are a few dialogues kept to service Rajini fans, nothing out of the place though.
Thanks to Rajini for choosing this script and Gnanavel for choosing Rajini to do this. Great movie, with good rewatch value. I came out of the theater fulfilled with joy.
It is a well executed movie. The acting was good and the director has gone an out of the way to bring logic in a horror movie to connect the new story. There are a few things executed differently from the regular cliche.
There is one big issue with though, it is trying to sell superstition as science. I understand that it is a movie but in the age of misinformation an average viewer will just take things at the face value. Seriously? Quantum entanglement? And there is a mixture of Buddhism and Christianity. I am no expert but I don't think Buddhism has any such superstitions. I liked the first version better but you can still give it a watch once.
There is one big issue with though, it is trying to sell superstition as science. I understand that it is a movie but in the age of misinformation an average viewer will just take things at the face value. Seriously? Quantum entanglement? And there is a mixture of Buddhism and Christianity. I am no expert but I don't think Buddhism has any such superstitions. I liked the first version better but you can still give it a watch once.