9 recensioni
For the people rating it "1" and saying it sucks... IT'S A LIFETIME MOVIE!!!!!!! None of their movies have spectacular plots, or acting, or direction. That's just the Lifetime standard. Once you realize that you're not going to be watching an Oscar-winner, you can learn to enjoy their movies.
This movie is entertaining for what it is. There were no shocks. Or suspense (though it was meant to convey both). The plot was predictable, especially the ending. But it was fun to watch for 90 minutes. If you need something to entertain yourself for a few hours, this movie, along with the rest of the Lifetime film catalog, will do the trick. Just don't expect too much, okay?
The movie is about a single man and woman who join a dating website to find love. They eventually find it in each other, though she lives in LA and he lives in Philadelphia. After going on a few dates, they fall in love and decide to get married; their wedding and "love story" is so highly coveted a film crew from the site films their wedding. We learn the man has a daughter, and holds a close relationship with his ex-wife and her new husband. Soon after the two move in together, the new wife begins having hallucinations and showing extreme, possessive jealously towards every single woman in her husband's life, even if they have no romantic connection.
Soon things escalate, leading to a final showdown, which again... wasn't a shocker. It was actually a bit of a letdown.
I gave this movie a 6/10 because, like I said before, it is what it is: a Lifetime film. If you've watched one Lifetime movie, you will know what to expect from this one.
This movie is entertaining for what it is. There were no shocks. Or suspense (though it was meant to convey both). The plot was predictable, especially the ending. But it was fun to watch for 90 minutes. If you need something to entertain yourself for a few hours, this movie, along with the rest of the Lifetime film catalog, will do the trick. Just don't expect too much, okay?
The movie is about a single man and woman who join a dating website to find love. They eventually find it in each other, though she lives in LA and he lives in Philadelphia. After going on a few dates, they fall in love and decide to get married; their wedding and "love story" is so highly coveted a film crew from the site films their wedding. We learn the man has a daughter, and holds a close relationship with his ex-wife and her new husband. Soon after the two move in together, the new wife begins having hallucinations and showing extreme, possessive jealously towards every single woman in her husband's life, even if they have no romantic connection.
Soon things escalate, leading to a final showdown, which again... wasn't a shocker. It was actually a bit of a letdown.
I gave this movie a 6/10 because, like I said before, it is what it is: a Lifetime film. If you've watched one Lifetime movie, you will know what to expect from this one.
- PrincessPeachx
- 1 gen 2013
- Permalink
Handsome, wealthy and well-built Cameron Mathison (as Bryant Meyers) is having problems meeting women. Yes, you read that correctly. Amicably divorced, Mr. Mathison lives in Philadelphia and shares custody of his ten-year-old daughter with ex-wife Cynthia Preston (as Virginia). None of that really explains why Mathison must turn to online dating; possibly, he likes to fantasize. On his laptop, Mathison meets attractive Sydney Penny (as Georgia). Although she lives in Los Angeles, they begin an online relationship. Their first physical meeting goes extraordinarily well. They end up satisfied, under the sheets. Marriage quickly follows, but Ms. Penny reveals a jealous side...
This is one of several "Lifetime" TV movies portraying the dangers of meeting people online...
Written by Christine Conradt and directed by Curtis Crawford, it follows familiar territory and is competently made. Neatly trimmed Mathison and pouting Penny are nicely matched. She gives an occasional crazy edge to her saner scenes and he adds an adult immaturity to aid in accepting his character. Little Emily Burley (as Megan) may be developmentally delayed, which is a nice touch. There is good support, especially from Krista Bridges (as Zenya Ivanski). She and director Crawford let us know much about "Zenya" while spilling cocktails with Mathison. Crawford keeps the camera steady and gives us great shots of table and counter tops. However, the ending is tacky.
***** The Wife He Met Online (4/21/12) Curtis Crawford ~ Sydney Penny, Cameron Mathison, Cynthia Preston, Krista Bridges
This is one of several "Lifetime" TV movies portraying the dangers of meeting people online...
Written by Christine Conradt and directed by Curtis Crawford, it follows familiar territory and is competently made. Neatly trimmed Mathison and pouting Penny are nicely matched. She gives an occasional crazy edge to her saner scenes and he adds an adult immaturity to aid in accepting his character. Little Emily Burley (as Megan) may be developmentally delayed, which is a nice touch. There is good support, especially from Krista Bridges (as Zenya Ivanski). She and director Crawford let us know much about "Zenya" while spilling cocktails with Mathison. Crawford keeps the camera steady and gives us great shots of table and counter tops. However, the ending is tacky.
***** The Wife He Met Online (4/21/12) Curtis Crawford ~ Sydney Penny, Cameron Mathison, Cynthia Preston, Krista Bridges
- wes-connors
- 5 apr 2015
- Permalink
THE WIFE HE MET ONLINE (2012 TV movie)
5 out of 10 stars Time to Read: 3min
BASIC PLOT: Georgia Maricett (Sydney Penny) is a woman with issues, but she's determined to put them to rest, and start a life with her new husband, Bryant Meyers (Cameron Mathison). Unfortunately for Bryant, there are some things he doesn't know about Georgia, like how she tried to set her last boyfriend's house on fire, and how her mother died under mysterious circumstances.
Bryant is consumed with Georgia, and misses some of the red flags he should be paying attention to. His ex-wife, Virginia (Cynthia Preston) is more intuitive about the situation, and she's determined to find out if her suspicions are correct. She wonders why Georgia did not invite one single person to her own wedding? Georgia seems to have an excuse for everything, but that's not enough to quiet Virginia's unease.
The final straw is an altercation between Megan (Emily Burley) , Bryant & Virginia's daughter, and Georgia. Megan won't tell Virginia exactly what happened, but a mother can tell when something's off, and Virginia is sure something is not right here.
She begins an exhaustive deep dive into Georgia's former life. Can she uncover Georgia's enigmatic and shadowy past in time to save her family's future?
WHAT WORKS: *SYDNEY PENNY DOES HER USUAL GOOD JOB WITH WHAT SHE'S GIVEN Sydney Penny is great as Georgia, an unbalanced woman with an ax to grind. Her slow movements, leading to bursts of rage, really work here.
*THIS MOVIE PRESENTS PSYCHOLOGICALLY VALID POINTS PRESENTED IN A MELODRAMATIC WAY Every man in Georgia's life has let her down, and then cut and run, starting with her father. Men don't like to face this fact, but the statistics don't lie. When there's a crisis in families, men run. This is what's happened to Georgia her whole life, making HER TOO SYMPATHETIC! If Bryant really loved her, he should get her the help she needs, not dump her like a piece of trash. He also shouldn't lie to her about working so closely with his ex, or anything else. If he didn't love her that much, he never should have married her to begin with. It's a believable trope because we all see it so often, but it does make the protagonist (Bryant) very unlikable.
WHAT DOESN'T WORK:
*ALL OF THE PROTAGONISTS ARE UNLIKABLE, INCLUDING BRYANT'S YOUNG DAUGHTER, MEGAN Georgia overreacts when Megan (Emily Burley) uses her laptop, but she's not wrong in saying Megan should ask first, before using it. And what's with this kid flipping out like Georgia's after her with a knife, when all Georgia did was tell her to get some manners? Megan actually calls her mother at work, because she's told to ask before using a laptop? And then she forgets the whole thing, when Georgia buys her off with a video game? It makes Megan look spoiled, greedy and histrionic. It's ridiculous, and again, it makes Megan, unlikable, not Georgia.
*BRYANT TELLS GEORGIA HE'S NOT A LIAR, but literally 30 seconds before, she caught him in a lie about working with a woman he slept with! Bryant (Cameron Mathison) is a liar, and Georgia is not wrong in assuming men lie when there's something to lie about. Again, this makes the "protagonist," Bryant, unlikable, and the "villainess," Georgia, more sympathetic. That is the opposite of what you should have in a good melodrama.
*BRYANT SAYS TO GEORGIA "I WILL NEVER ABANDONED YOU LIKE YOUR FATHER, OR LIE TO YOUR LIKE YOUR MOTHER." But, you guessed it, he does both! Are we supposed to root for these people? Because I'm not. I hope Georgia kills 'em all! They're a pack of spoiled, self-serving, selfish, solipsistic creeps!
*SHE'S NOT MRS. GEORGIA MEYERS! This is just a pet peeve, but if she was Mrs. Georgia Meyers, she'd be married to Georgia. She is in fact, Mrs. Bryant Meyers, or Mrs. Meyers, or Georgia Meyers, or even Ms. Georgia Meyers, but she's not married to herself. I wish people would learn proper title usage! And while we're at it, why does Virginia (Bryant's ex-wife) still have his last name, even after she's remarried? That's not right either.
*VIRGINIA, BRYANT'S EX, USES A FLIMSY PRETEXT TO SNOOP INTO GEORGIA'S BACKGROUND Virginia (Cynthia Preston) acts like the "fight" Georgia had with her daughter Megan, is enough of a reason to violate Georgia's privacy, and go after her. Again, she makes it seem like Georgia did something wrong when she told Megan (Virginia's daughter) to get some manners, and ask before you use someone's laptop. This is not unreasonable behavior, but everyone acts like she committed murder by disciplining Megan a little harshly. It's not enough of a reason to call seven people, violating Georgia's privacy, and injecting herself into her ex-husband's marriage. Calling Georgia's ex is more than stepping over a line, it's a deal breaker. To make matters worse, it's not even a good source of information (who speaks kindly about their ex?). Virginia is a habitual line stepper, who's behavior needs to be checked. Why doesn't she understand her investigation into Georgia's past, could cause serious issues with Bryant, the father of her child? Why doesn't her new husband tell her to back off? This is just more lazy writing from Christine Conradt. And again, Virginia's behavior makes the "protagonists" unlikable, which is a cardinal sin in this type of melodrama. (Side note: How did Virginia get a copy of Georgia's resume to know whom to call? Just another plothole.)
*THIS IS A COLLECTION OF THE MOST UNLIKABLE PEOPLE YOU'LL EVER WATCH The whole theme of the movie, from EVERYBODY (except Georgia) is, if people don't serve your needs, throw them away. There's no compassion, understanding or loyalty from anyone. Virginia throws Bryant away, Bryant throws Zenya and Georgia away, etc etc etc. It's a group of people who believe in disposable relationships, and there's not one likable character in the whole movie. The sad thing is, this movie could have been a great melodrama with some tweaking from Christine Conradt, but it just didn't get it.
TO RECOMMEND, OR NOT TO RECOMMEND, THAT IS THE QUESTION: *If you like made-for-tv movies, and you like rooting for the villainess, then definitely give this a try. I would also recommend this to fans of Sydney Penny. She's the standout here, and gives a worthwhile performance. It's a fun time waster, with some entertaining moments. However, if you like the good guys in your movies to be honorable, or if you like your movies rooted in reality, then give this a pass.
CLOSING NOTES: *THIS IS A MADE-FOR-TV MOVIE, please keep that in mind before you watch/rate it. TV movies have a much lower budget, and so your expectations should be adjusted.
*I HAVE NO CONNECTION TO THE FILM, or production in ANY way. This review was NOT written in full, or in part, by a bot. I am just an honest viewer, who wishes for more straight forward reviews (less trolls and fanboys), and better entertainment. Hope I helped you out.
BASIC PLOT: Georgia Maricett (Sydney Penny) is a woman with issues, but she's determined to put them to rest, and start a life with her new husband, Bryant Meyers (Cameron Mathison). Unfortunately for Bryant, there are some things he doesn't know about Georgia, like how she tried to set her last boyfriend's house on fire, and how her mother died under mysterious circumstances.
Bryant is consumed with Georgia, and misses some of the red flags he should be paying attention to. His ex-wife, Virginia (Cynthia Preston) is more intuitive about the situation, and she's determined to find out if her suspicions are correct. She wonders why Georgia did not invite one single person to her own wedding? Georgia seems to have an excuse for everything, but that's not enough to quiet Virginia's unease.
The final straw is an altercation between Megan (Emily Burley) , Bryant & Virginia's daughter, and Georgia. Megan won't tell Virginia exactly what happened, but a mother can tell when something's off, and Virginia is sure something is not right here.
She begins an exhaustive deep dive into Georgia's former life. Can she uncover Georgia's enigmatic and shadowy past in time to save her family's future?
WHAT WORKS: *SYDNEY PENNY DOES HER USUAL GOOD JOB WITH WHAT SHE'S GIVEN Sydney Penny is great as Georgia, an unbalanced woman with an ax to grind. Her slow movements, leading to bursts of rage, really work here.
*THIS MOVIE PRESENTS PSYCHOLOGICALLY VALID POINTS PRESENTED IN A MELODRAMATIC WAY Every man in Georgia's life has let her down, and then cut and run, starting with her father. Men don't like to face this fact, but the statistics don't lie. When there's a crisis in families, men run. This is what's happened to Georgia her whole life, making HER TOO SYMPATHETIC! If Bryant really loved her, he should get her the help she needs, not dump her like a piece of trash. He also shouldn't lie to her about working so closely with his ex, or anything else. If he didn't love her that much, he never should have married her to begin with. It's a believable trope because we all see it so often, but it does make the protagonist (Bryant) very unlikable.
WHAT DOESN'T WORK:
*ALL OF THE PROTAGONISTS ARE UNLIKABLE, INCLUDING BRYANT'S YOUNG DAUGHTER, MEGAN Georgia overreacts when Megan (Emily Burley) uses her laptop, but she's not wrong in saying Megan should ask first, before using it. And what's with this kid flipping out like Georgia's after her with a knife, when all Georgia did was tell her to get some manners? Megan actually calls her mother at work, because she's told to ask before using a laptop? And then she forgets the whole thing, when Georgia buys her off with a video game? It makes Megan look spoiled, greedy and histrionic. It's ridiculous, and again, it makes Megan, unlikable, not Georgia.
*BRYANT TELLS GEORGIA HE'S NOT A LIAR, but literally 30 seconds before, she caught him in a lie about working with a woman he slept with! Bryant (Cameron Mathison) is a liar, and Georgia is not wrong in assuming men lie when there's something to lie about. Again, this makes the "protagonist," Bryant, unlikable, and the "villainess," Georgia, more sympathetic. That is the opposite of what you should have in a good melodrama.
*BRYANT SAYS TO GEORGIA "I WILL NEVER ABANDONED YOU LIKE YOUR FATHER, OR LIE TO YOUR LIKE YOUR MOTHER." But, you guessed it, he does both! Are we supposed to root for these people? Because I'm not. I hope Georgia kills 'em all! They're a pack of spoiled, self-serving, selfish, solipsistic creeps!
*SHE'S NOT MRS. GEORGIA MEYERS! This is just a pet peeve, but if she was Mrs. Georgia Meyers, she'd be married to Georgia. She is in fact, Mrs. Bryant Meyers, or Mrs. Meyers, or Georgia Meyers, or even Ms. Georgia Meyers, but she's not married to herself. I wish people would learn proper title usage! And while we're at it, why does Virginia (Bryant's ex-wife) still have his last name, even after she's remarried? That's not right either.
*VIRGINIA, BRYANT'S EX, USES A FLIMSY PRETEXT TO SNOOP INTO GEORGIA'S BACKGROUND Virginia (Cynthia Preston) acts like the "fight" Georgia had with her daughter Megan, is enough of a reason to violate Georgia's privacy, and go after her. Again, she makes it seem like Georgia did something wrong when she told Megan (Virginia's daughter) to get some manners, and ask before you use someone's laptop. This is not unreasonable behavior, but everyone acts like she committed murder by disciplining Megan a little harshly. It's not enough of a reason to call seven people, violating Georgia's privacy, and injecting herself into her ex-husband's marriage. Calling Georgia's ex is more than stepping over a line, it's a deal breaker. To make matters worse, it's not even a good source of information (who speaks kindly about their ex?). Virginia is a habitual line stepper, who's behavior needs to be checked. Why doesn't she understand her investigation into Georgia's past, could cause serious issues with Bryant, the father of her child? Why doesn't her new husband tell her to back off? This is just more lazy writing from Christine Conradt. And again, Virginia's behavior makes the "protagonists" unlikable, which is a cardinal sin in this type of melodrama. (Side note: How did Virginia get a copy of Georgia's resume to know whom to call? Just another plothole.)
*THIS IS A COLLECTION OF THE MOST UNLIKABLE PEOPLE YOU'LL EVER WATCH The whole theme of the movie, from EVERYBODY (except Georgia) is, if people don't serve your needs, throw them away. There's no compassion, understanding or loyalty from anyone. Virginia throws Bryant away, Bryant throws Zenya and Georgia away, etc etc etc. It's a group of people who believe in disposable relationships, and there's not one likable character in the whole movie. The sad thing is, this movie could have been a great melodrama with some tweaking from Christine Conradt, but it just didn't get it.
TO RECOMMEND, OR NOT TO RECOMMEND, THAT IS THE QUESTION: *If you like made-for-tv movies, and you like rooting for the villainess, then definitely give this a try. I would also recommend this to fans of Sydney Penny. She's the standout here, and gives a worthwhile performance. It's a fun time waster, with some entertaining moments. However, if you like the good guys in your movies to be honorable, or if you like your movies rooted in reality, then give this a pass.
CLOSING NOTES: *THIS IS A MADE-FOR-TV MOVIE, please keep that in mind before you watch/rate it. TV movies have a much lower budget, and so your expectations should be adjusted.
*I HAVE NO CONNECTION TO THE FILM, or production in ANY way. This review was NOT written in full, or in part, by a bot. I am just an honest viewer, who wishes for more straight forward reviews (less trolls and fanboys), and better entertainment. Hope I helped you out.
- vnssyndrome89
- 10 set 2024
- Permalink
Look I can't give it a one star (or less rating) because I haven't finished but I watched most of it and couldn't finish it. This is very unusual for me because I almost always finish movies but this one had no thrill or mystery it was just annoying to me honestly. The main female actress does a great job acting all psycho and annoying. I don't know maybe other people could disagree with me but I just didn't like it at all. The little girl was an awful young actress. I am not trying to be harsh or mean but she just didn't act well. I must admit that I was surprised with a few details that I won't mention so I wont spoil the movie for you if you are planning to watch it but these little details were not crucial in the movie as the story develops.
Over all the movie isn't really that bad but it is not the type of movie that I like. I like suspense and thrill and this one just didn't have it that much. Instead it fits drama more.
Over all the movie isn't really that bad but it is not the type of movie that I like. I like suspense and thrill and this one just didn't have it that much. Instead it fits drama more.
Somehow, this average film captivated me and I watched the whole length of it. The name of the film relates to the life of many unattached people nowadays – cyberspace dating! So perhaps it should be viewed before venturing into a relationship based on e-mail and Skype, without actual networking, family or school connections. There is romance in this film but it is not a "You Got Mail" or "Restless in Seattle" either.
I was intrigued because it was made in Canada, with many Canadian Actors, thus far seen on TV soaps, or Dancing with the Stars, or some horror movies, in short – unknowns. But the acting was good. There is a plot that moves along, and at the end there is an odd moment when Bryant receives a package from the on-line dating company congratulating the two correspondents wishing them a good life together. What was a bit unbelievable are the excellent relations between the ex-wife and her new husband and the ex-husband .somehow it does not seem that real. I was impressed by the costume designs by Andy Tait, Georgia in particular was beautifully attired throughout the film.
I was intrigued because it was made in Canada, with many Canadian Actors, thus far seen on TV soaps, or Dancing with the Stars, or some horror movies, in short – unknowns. But the acting was good. There is a plot that moves along, and at the end there is an odd moment when Bryant receives a package from the on-line dating company congratulating the two correspondents wishing them a good life together. What was a bit unbelievable are the excellent relations between the ex-wife and her new husband and the ex-husband .somehow it does not seem that real. I was impressed by the costume designs by Andy Tait, Georgia in particular was beautifully attired throughout the film.
- ndesai-794-324297
- 28 nov 2013
- Permalink