Sometimes, I wonder about the ratings given to various movies. Are they being voted on by the production company and actors to get some popularity or are there people out there who genuinely feel that movies such as this are brilliant ??? This movie looks like a cheap adult production, with the graphic sex removed.
The acting is inept; the plot barren; the editing poor and the "music" score sounds like something from a 1970's synthesizer.
In brief, this is *not* a movie that deserves any form of rating over 1-star. And I would only give it 1-star for the audacity to make such a movie. If it were possible to give a negative rating to balance the final outcome, I would have happily done so.
This movie falls into the category where I don't care about the money I've spent to watch the title. I care about losing the 15 minutes of my life (I actually fast-forwarded much of the movie in the slim hope that it may have gotten better - it didn't).
Even the laptop computer that was used by "Carl" had the company logo blocked out - I wonder if the company didn't want to be known that they had their equipment used in such a sub-zero production ?
The acting is inept; the plot barren; the editing poor and the "music" score sounds like something from a 1970's synthesizer.
In brief, this is *not* a movie that deserves any form of rating over 1-star. And I would only give it 1-star for the audacity to make such a movie. If it were possible to give a negative rating to balance the final outcome, I would have happily done so.
This movie falls into the category where I don't care about the money I've spent to watch the title. I care about losing the 15 minutes of my life (I actually fast-forwarded much of the movie in the slim hope that it may have gotten better - it didn't).
Even the laptop computer that was used by "Carl" had the company logo blocked out - I wonder if the company didn't want to be known that they had their equipment used in such a sub-zero production ?