‘Deep-rooted conspiracy’: Court sends ex-DJB CEO, aide to ACB custody

‘Deep-rooted conspiracy’: Court sends ex-DJB CEO, aide to ACB custody
New Delhi: A Delhi court has granted Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) two-day police custody of former Delhi Jal Board (DJB) CEO Udit Prakash and alleged middleman Nagendra Yadav, holding that their custodial interrogation was necessary to probe a “deep-rooted, multi-layered conspiracy involving corruption of several crores of rupees”.Special judge Dig Vinay Singh said police custody was required for a “fair investigation” and to “unearth other aspects of the conspiracy”, including the involvement of other persons.On Prakash’s alleged role, prosecutor Manish Rawat submitted that he had approved various corrigendums after their contents were allegedly shared with him by co-accused on WhatsApp before their official issuance. The court also examined a disputed loan agreement and observed, “Apparently it does not appear to be a typographical error in the date,” noting that Prakash himself had signed the document dated Feb 10, 2023.The court said ACB’s apprehension that the loan agreement “may have been subsequently created” to give the transaction “a colour of genuineness cannot be brushed aside at this stage”. It further observed that witness statements “point finger regarding the involvement of the accused in conspiracy”.With regard to Yadav, the court said his alleged role in hawala transactions required further investigation.Rejecting the defence’s argument that police custody was unnecessary as Enforcement Directorate (ED) had already investigated the proceeds of crime under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), the court said: “Merely because a PMLA complaint has already been filed and the route of the proceeds of crime has been investigated by ED under PMLA, it can’t mean that a predicate offence need not be investigated further.
The court said the predicate offence and the PMLA offence were “completely independent and unconnected”. It also held that the absence of arrest by ED could not bar police custody in the predicate offence.The court noted that the roles of both accused had emerged in subsequent witness statements and held that two-day police custody was necessary for a fair investigation.Prakash and Yadav were arrested along with former DJB minister Satyendar Jain on Aug 18 in a case related to the alleged manipulation of tenders for augmentation and upgradation of 10 sewage treatment plants (STPs). ACB has alleged that the tender process was rigged to favour Euroteck Environmental Pvt Ltd, causing losses to the govt exchequer.

author
About the AuthorKoushiki Saha
Koushiki Saha, a trainee journalist currently reporting for The Times of India, covers urban governance, infrastructure lapses, public grievances, and municipal policies with clarity and compassion. Still learning every day, she draws insights from fieldwork, lived experiences, and holding authorities accountable through persistent, people-focused reporting.
End of Article
Follow Us On Social Media