Should I use beta1 from limpa::dpc() or limpa::dpcCN(), if they differ?
1
0
Entering edit mode
@5b6cc501
Last seen 9 hours ago
Slovakia

I have 17k peptides and 96 samples imported from dia-nn report. No preprocessing except of filterNonProteotypicPeptides and filterCompoundProteins was done.

dpc() gives 0.63 and dpcCN() gives 1.05. Which of them should I use in limpa::dpcQuant()?

I expect that very few samples may be outliers.

limpa • 35 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@gordon-smyth
Last seen 17 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia

I tend to use dpcCN(), because it more robust than dpc() to experiments with lots of samples and big differences between samples. You could also try dpcON(, robust=TRUE), which is a newer, faster and more robust version of dpc(). We are in the process of phasing out the original dpc() in favour of dpcON().

We find that limpa is pretty robust to the exact dpc.slope that is used, and you will probably get pretty consistent DE lists using either 0.63 or 1.05.

Please see the example limpa analyses at https://github.com/smythlab/limpa/. The renal cancer case study provides an example of filtering and normalization.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 788 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6