+
+

Related Products

  • JetBrains Junie
    12 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Retool
    593 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Google AI Studio
    40 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Screencapt
    140 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Checksum.ai
    1 Rating
    Visit Website
  • BAND
    3 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Aikido Security
    239 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform
    999 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • DbVisualizer
    585 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • JAMS Scheduler
    279 Ratings
    Visit Website

About

Cursor is an AI coding agent and development platform for building ambitious software faster. The platform lets developers hand off tasks to agents that can build, test, demo, and prepare features for review. Cursor supports autonomous and parallel agent workflows, including cloud agents that can work on multiple tasks across repositories. It runs across the editor, terminal, Slack, and GitHub, helping teams automate coding, code review, PR workflows, and repetitive engineering work. Cursor also lets users choose from leading AI models for different tasks, including models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, SpaceXAI, and Cursor. Built for developers, engineering teams, and enterprises, Cursor helps accelerate software development while keeping humans focused on decisions and review.

About

Muse Code is Meta’s terminal coding agent, powered by Muse Spark 1.2, for handling complex software engineering tasks across large repositories. The agent can plan changes, write code, validate results, and coordinate multiple persistent subagents during development sessions. Muse Code uses async background agents that stay active throughout a session to reduce repeated information gathering and help complete multi-step tasks with less steering. Its runtime uses a local event log that records model calls, tool runs, approvals, and edits so sessions can be replayed and resumed after failures. Muse Code includes bundled skills such as /plan for approval-gated planning, /grill for stress-testing plans, and /goal for working toward completion. Built for AI developers and software teams, Muse Code helps automate coding workflows, long-running engineering tasks, debugging, and repository-level development.

Platforms Supported

Windows Supported
Mac Supported
Linux Supported
Cloud Supported
On-Premises Not Supported
iPhone Supported
iPad Supported
Android Not Supported
Chromebook Not Supported

Platforms Supported

Windows Supported
Mac Supported
Linux Supported
Cloud Not Supported
On-Premises Not Supported
iPhone Not Supported
iPad Not Supported
Android Not Supported
Chromebook Not Supported

Audience

Developers, engineering teams, software companies, startups, enterprise engineering organizations, product teams, DevOps teams, AI coding teams, code reviewers, and technical leaders that need AI coding agents, autonomous development, cloud agents, parallel task execution, code review, CLI workflows, Slack collaboration, GitHub integration, model choice, automations, and secure software development at scale

Audience

Software engineers, AI developers, coding agent users, platform teams, DevOps teams, ML engineers, research teams, enterprise development teams, and organizations that need terminal coding agents, repository automation, code generation, debugging, validation, persistent subagents, replay-safe execution, long-running coding workflows, and end-to-end software development support

Support

Phone Support Not Supported
24/7 Live Support Not Supported
Online Supported

Support

Phone Support Not Supported
24/7 Live Support Not Supported
Online Supported

API

Offers API Supported

API

Offers API Supported

Screenshots and Videos

Screenshots and Videos

Pricing

$20/month
Free Version Supported
Free Trial Not Supported

Pricing

$1.25 per 1M tokens (input)
Standard pricing: $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens

Discounted "contributor" tier costing $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens for users who agree to share feedback to improve the AI.
Free Version Supported
Free Trial Not Supported

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 5.0 / 5
ease 5.0 / 5
features 5.0 / 5
design 5.0 / 5
support 5.0 / 5

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 5.0 / 5
ease 5.0 / 5

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • Cursor is one of the best AI coding tools because it feels built around how developers actually work. It is not just autocomplete; it can understand a repo, make edits, explain code, help debug, and work through bigger tasks with an agentic workflow. I like that it combines the familiar feel of a code editor with deeper AI features like Agent mode, project rules, MCP, skills, and CLI support. That makes it useful for everyday coding, but also flexible enough for more advanced workflows. The model options and pricing controls are also helpful. Being able to choose stronger or cheaper models depending on the task makes Cursor easier to fit into a real development routine.
  • I'm a novice to intermediate programmer and I've always felt a bit overwhelmed by editors. I've been learning to code by copy and pasting a million times into chatgpt. Switching to cursor saves me so much time, and I love how easy it is to give it the context. It has this awesome feature where you can upload docs into it and it can go pull the docs when answering questions, which was one of my biggest pain points as a user when AI would give me old docs or out of date code. Another epic feature was the natural language terminal commands, which have allowed me to get through projects i previously would get stuck on.

Cons

  • I don't have any cons about Cursor. Use it daily in my development.
  • No IDE is perfect, but this one is by far my favorite. I think most of the cons lie in the limitations of the AI models right now. I think the code interpreter is a littley sketchy to use becuase it's hard to see exactly what code its suggesting I change so I ran into some issues when using it without double checking the work, but it also saved me in a couple spots I got stuck.

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • Muse Code looks exciting because Meta is finally going after coding agents directly, not just releasing another general AI model. A terminal-based agent that can write code, inspect software, run tests, and validate changes is exactly the kind of workflow developers actually care about. The pricing angle is a big deal. Meta is pitching Muse Code as one of the more affordable coding agents, with a lower-cost tier that is reportedly less than one-tenth the cost of its general Muse Spark model. That matters if you use coding agents all day instead of just for the occasional refactor. I also like that it is powered by Muse Spark 1.2, which sounds more focused on software engineering than earlier Muse Spark releases. If Meta can make the agent reliable inside real repos, Muse Code could become a serious daily tool.

Cons

  • It is still in beta, so I would not trust it blindly yet. Coding agents need to prove themselves on messy codebases, failing tests, weird dependencies, security-sensitive changes, and long multi-step tasks. I would also want to see more independent developer feedback. Meta’s pricing and positioning are interesting, but the real test is whether Muse Code can consistently make good changes without wasting time or creating cleanup work.

Training

Documentation Supported
Webinars Not Supported
Live Online Not Supported
In Person Not Supported

Training

Documentation Supported
Webinars Not Supported
Live Online Not Supported
In Person Not Supported

Company Information

Cursor
Founded: 2022
United States
www.cursor.com

Company Information

Meta
Founded: 2004
United States
meta.ai

Alternatives

JetBrains Junie

JetBrains Junie

JetBrains

Alternatives

Claude Code

Claude Code

Anthropic
Bolt.new

Bolt.new

StackBlitz
Hermes Agent

Hermes Agent

Nous Research
Devin Desktop

Devin Desktop

Cognition
Amp

Amp

Amp Code

Categories

Agentic AI Supported
AI Code Generators Supported
AI Code Review Supported
AI Coding Agents Supported
AI Copilots Supported
AI IDEs Supported
Code Editors Supported
IDE Supported
Pair Programming Supported
Vibe Coding Supported

Categories

Integrations

AXL Supported
Claude Sonnet 3.5 Supported
CodeGuide Supported
DevReadyKit Supported
GPT-5.1-Codex Supported
Grok 4.1 Thinking Supported
Grok 4.7 Supported
MemClaw Supported
NativeBridge Supported
Reply Argus Supported
Shaders Supported
Shyne Supported
Superwhisper Supported
Symvanta Supported
Thunder Compute Supported
Userback Supported
Vibe Island Supported
VibeScan Supported
VidSeeds.ai Supported
Weave Supported

Integrations

AXL Not Supported
Claude Sonnet 3.5 Not Supported
CodeGuide Not Supported
DevReadyKit Not Supported
GPT-5.1-Codex Not Supported
Grok 4.1 Thinking Not Supported
Grok 4.7 Not Supported
MemClaw Not Supported
NativeBridge Not Supported
Reply Argus Not Supported
Shaders Not Supported
Shyne Not Supported
Superwhisper Not Supported
Symvanta Not Supported
Thunder Compute Not Supported
Userback Not Supported
Vibe Island Not Supported
VibeScan Not Supported
VidSeeds.ai Not Supported
Weave Not Supported
Claim Cursor and update features and information
Claim Cursor and update features and information
Claim Muse Code and update features and information
Claim Muse Code and update features and information