I was reading a new-car review of the 2007 Honda Fit.
Despite having a smaller 1.5-liter engine than my 2001 Corolla’s 1.8-liter, and a five-speed auto versus a four-speed, it only is rated at 2 mpg better on the highway, and is rated the same as a 2005 Corolla similarly equipped to mine.
A car like this should get an even 40 with its base engine that size.
And, contrary to Honda PR, this is NOT a subcompact. It weighs within 100 pounds of a 2005 Corolla and as much as mine.
The biggest problem? The engine is a cheapie. Honda only put a single cam in it.
I thought that was something just American carmakers did.
Toyota’s Yaris does better, at 39/34, with a four-speed auto; of course, it comes in 200 pounds lighter and has a dual-cam engine. Now, if Toyota would just bump the auto tranny to a five-speed.
Nissan’s Versa is the worst. It is clearly, even more than Fit, a compact, not a subcompact. It’s a foot longer and 200 pounds more than the Fit. So, it has no choice but to have a 1.8 liter engine, I guess. But, that engine, even with a dual cam, only weighs in at 28/35 on mileage.
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
Showing posts with label cars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cars. Show all posts
November 14, 2006
Automakers continue to backpedal on car mileage
Labels:
cars
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)